Mail Archive Search: <+from:ad4yh@nortel.ca>

Results:

References: [ +from:ad4yh@nortel.ca: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Sign on to Reflector (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 21 Aug 1998 08:41 EDT; Bob you can do this if your email_thingie has the ability to edit the: ZUT de AD4YH UP _ __ __ __ / | / /__ _____/ /____ / / / |/ / _ \/ ___/ __/ _ \/ / / /| / (/ / / / /_/ __/ / /_/ |_/\___/_/ \__/; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00201.html (7,815 bytes)
2. [TenTec] ARRL proposal (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 24 Jul 1998 09:27 EDT; I Like this. We need go gather together and the ARRL about this insanity. That is the only way! I suggest a spam operation. Maybe they will get the message! - Dale, AD4YH Also a true Extra form back; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00263.html (8,702 bytes)
3. [TenTec] 9 volt batteries (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 16 Apr 1998 09:50 EDT; Batteries MUST be tested under a load. A VOM will in no way give an accurate indication unless the measurement is taken while the battery has a load across the terminals. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00146.html (7,163 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Microphone for Omni-D (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 16 Dec 1997 10:03 EST; Henry, You already have the best mic you could put on that OMNI-D. I have the OMNI-D and a Paragon II. I use a crystal D-104 with both of these. I get "broadcact quality" audio reports with the D-104; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00136.html (6,791 bytes)
5. [TenTec] TT service (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 18 Dec 1997 08:42 EST; The FT1000D is a benchmark? Hmmm. Ever try one O' dem on CW? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00154.html (7,519 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni VI Main Tuning Knob (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 10 Nov 1997 09:38 EST; I HAVE A PARAGON II WITH THE SAME TUNING KNOB...TAKE THE KNOB APART AND COMPLETELY REMOVE THE TENSION SPRING... == THE LITTLE FELT PAD ON THE END OF THE TENSION SPRING WILL EVENTUALLY WEAR AND CAUSE; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-11/msg00063.html (9,872 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Using the scout mobile (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 25 Nov 1997 09:58 EST; This is a very good idea...It will also help you squeeze more operation out of a good battery as the charge drops off (on current peaks.) I dont think a battery has any internal impedance tho...unle; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-11/msg00176.html (7,169 bytes)
8. [TenTec] R-7000 Vertical Experience (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 16 Oct 1997 14:47 EDT; Well here it is from the horse's mouth. I was one of the two stations that were involved with the on-the-air R7000 testing. The article presents the R7000 in a pretty good light. It seemed to be wor; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00122.html (10,102 bytes)
9. [TenTec] 238 (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 22 Sep 1997 10:57 EDT; Good explaination Steve - I also have a 238 and have been very pleased with it. The L network approach is much more efficient (less loss) at matching different loads. There was an article in a recen; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00128.html (7,467 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Ten-Tec On-The-Air Net (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 23 Sep 1997 14:55 EDT; Hmmm. Might be interesting. Should have both a SSB and CW net. CW cuz deres lotsa folks dat only got da TEN-TECs fer CW! ZUT ad4yh -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions:; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00157.html (6,874 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Amps & Wildlife (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 26 Sep 1997 13:27 EDT; It's not just the voltage but also the current that is available to be drawn in the circuit! Hey there Puck didn't know ya mess with dis here email kind o' thingie. I'll be looken fer ya on 80. ZUT A; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00209.html (6,803 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Omni V vs. Paragon (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 03 Jul 1997 12:16 EDT; Hello dere Gene & all... I have a Paragon II. The main difference between it and the OMNI V is that the Paragon also has general coverage. I have had mine for about 1.5 years now, and it has been a g; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-07/msg00014.html (7,248 bytes)
13. [TenTec] FS: : OmniD -- pulling it off the market (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 09 Jul 1997 09:11 EDT; [I will have to make a serious decision about S/N ] [2345 Omni 546, but for now, I can't let it go for] [cheap...its family ya know. ] Well Grant, you had me worried there for a while. I'm so glad yo; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-07/msg00042.html (7,269 bytes)
14. [TenTec] "Apparent" birdies in receivers (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 18 Jul 1997 09:36 EDT; Yup! ya gotta keep in mind da historical perspective! Back in the early days of wireless the bands were allocated to be very much indeed harmonically related. That's not a bug, its a feature. Ya need; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-07/msg00140.html (7,998 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Scout at QRP -- mine works good (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 11 Jun 1997 09:44 EDT; Itel bea wrken justa fine fer ya at da klunker speeds. The failure mode is at the high speed keying rates. I would have one myself if it didn't die at da QRQ speeds. ad4yh - Hard core TenTecher -- F; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00064.html (7,373 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Omni VI plus verses the Yaesu FT1000! (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 21 May 1997 15:09 EDT; Way ta go dere Chris. Ya tellem en ya tellem gud. Cuden't agree more...dale -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00106.html (8,270 bytes)
17. [TenTec] MARS rigs (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 08 Apr 1997 09:17 EDT; Paul the Paragons will do from around 1700 kc up to 30 Mhz, all modes with a small, easy-to-do modification....73 AD4YH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-04/msg00029.html (6,944 bytes)
18. [TenTec] OMNI SEX PLUS (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 10 Apr 1997 08:59 EDT; Lewis this must be your first Ten Tec. Have fun. Dale - AD4YH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-04/msg00043.html (6,611 bytes)
19. [TenTec] TITAN input SWR problem HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 11 Apr 1997 08:46 EDT; Michael - I believe the amp has a "tuned" input. Try turning off the internal tuner in the rig. It just sounds like the internal tuner in your rig is seeing some kind of weird Xl or Xc and is getting; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-04/msg00054.html (6,952 bytes)
20. [TenTec] TenTec G5RV (score: 1): Author: ad4yh@nortel.ca (Dale Pendleton); Date: 11 Apr 1997 12:15 EDT; 1. The G5RV is not really a <resonant> antenna. 2. Anytime the antenna is not at resonance, the the impedance will vary along the length of the feedline. 3. The 70' is most likely one of the best "o; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-04/msg00055.html (7,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]