Mail Archive Search: <+from:al

Results:

References: [ +from:al_lorona@agilent.com: 118 ]

Total 118 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] re: Monitor noise (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:33:50 -0600; http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2002-June/048011.html Hi, Rich, Click on the link above to see a post that was made just this week on the CQ-Contest reflector by big-time contester Dave, K6LL; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00123.html (7,179 bytes)
22. [TenTec] RE: Serious Concerns (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:20:13 -0600; I am delighted that several folks have indicated their decision *not* to purchase a new Orion, a decision based predominantly on the display and other cosmetic issues. I hope that many hams, especial; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00508.html (6,682 bytes)
23. [TenTec] Headphones (was any real live reports yet?) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:53:14 -0600; I don't know about the headphones being the culprit; wouldn't it be the listening levels (volume) really doing the damage? It reminded me of a post from last year: http://lists.contesting.com/_tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00609.html (8,116 bytes)
24. [TenTec] Rig Chart (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 22:53:32 -0700; In the last few years I have become convinced that the two-tone 3rd order dynamic range numbers in ARRL reviews measured with a 20 kHz tone spacing are absolutely irrelevant in demanding amateur radi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00202.html (9,911 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Are Specs Guaranteed? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 21:09:35 -0600; You know, Duane brings up something I have always wondered about. An example: When a manufacturer says that their radio has 100 dB of dynamic range, is that a guaranteed figure? Or is it an average n; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00231.html (8,163 bytes)
26. [TenTec] ARRL reviews (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:56:40 -0600; Bill, I guess you're right. I guess we can read between the lines of a review to get the real scoop. And as you say, this is where a picture is worth a thousand... you know. Pictures as in photograph; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00318.html (9,127 bytes)
27. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:37:48 -0600; Stuart, I think I can say this without offending you, but this must be the most complicated thing ever invented, or else my brain is finally starting to show signs of carelessness in my younger years; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00499.html (12,603 bytes)
28. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:32:40 -0600; Right, Paul. This is another way of approaching the question I posted last week (about which no one has really had anything to say). If the same final amplifier design can vary by that much... it thr; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00507.html (10,382 bytes)
29. [TenTec] The Rogers /Dobbins ARL Folded Conical Helix Antennapaper now published. Revolution in small HF Antenna design! (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:58:01 -0700; Hey, Stuart, don't forget to post this to the rec.radio.amateur.antenna newsgroup. WARNING: You're going to get hammered, but you may also get some interesting reactions from the technically astute t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00212.html (7,113 bytes)
30. [TenTec] It's "Only" 1.7 dB (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 12:47:39 -0700; As a QRP aficionado, I am inclined to agree that 1.7 dB isn't a big enough difference to worry about, but I suppose there could be reasons why it would be important to someone. Perhaps a person has 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00701.html (9,476 bytes)
31. [TenTec] Omni-6+ RX audio / EQ? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:53:34 -0700; Hi, Mike, The suggestions so far put forth will all work, but you will very quickly hit a limit on the receive bandwidth on the Omni VI which is caused by the DSP codec always being in the receive p; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00857.html (8,706 bytes)
32. [TenTec] Omni-6+ RX audio / EQ? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:44:48 -0700; Yes, that's right, Barry. You pick off direct from the product detector and you lose all of the DSP functionality if you go into the volume control, which is presumably what your mod does. I haven't; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00861.html (8,146 bytes)
33. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:59:55 -0700; I posted a reply about measuring "microchirp" yesterday but it never made it to the list. Here's my second try: -- In fact, you can. You need an instrument that can capture a signal without missing a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00002.html (8,552 bytes)
34. [TenTec] RE: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:02:52 -0700; Paul-- Man, you are absolutely right. I really just wanted people to know that you can measure just about anything given the right test equipment. I don't really appreciate it enough, but one of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00011.html (11,189 bytes)
35. [TenTec] Simple Stuff (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:21:24 -0700; Hi, Everybody, The recent (ongoing) threads on 1/ keying waveshapes and 2/ speech compression are really encouraging to me for this reason: what might have been regarded as old topics or issues that; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00410.html (7,757 bytes)
36. [TenTec] Orion Pricing (long) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:44:34 -0700; Hi, Everybody, good discussion. I believe that you get what you pay for. One of my peeves is making any decision based *solely* on price. I have friends who drive five miles out of their way to shop; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00406.html (10,574 bytes)
37. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:48:29 -0700; In fact, you can. The instrument has to be able to capture a signal and show you the signal's frequency vs. time. This type of plot is called a "spectrogram" and can be found on instruments called Ve; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00619.html (19,093 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Spurious 147.495 MHz signal from RX320 (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:55:35 -0700; Hi, Mark, This seems to be a trouble frequency. My truck puts out a full-quieting spur on 147.495, and I have heard it inside of hotel rooms and in my house as well. Maybe it is a harmonic of some co; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00037.html (8,325 bytes)
39. [TenTec] Radio Manufacturing Economics Vs Technology (long) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:12:48 -0700; so Mike I remember starting a thread some time ago in which I declared that the Omni VI was probably the last amateur radio transceiver that would be "user-serviceable" largely because of the reason; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00068.html (7,498 bytes)
40. [TenTec] New TT QRP Rig (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:44:19 -0700; Duffy It would be nice to deliver on time, every time, but... a lot of times stuff happens. A little over a year ago the company I work for could not deliver on their promises to manufacture several; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-12/msg00070.html (10,598 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]