Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:al_lorona@agilent.com: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TenTec] Hi power Ten Tec ant tuner swr drift? (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:20:44 -0700
Hello, Original Poster, Well, I am guilty of the same offense that seems to plague almost every question posted here... I didn't answer the original question. Good idea to call Ten Tec. They may tel
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00336.html (9,070 bytes)

22. RE: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:53:52 -0700
<snip> <snip> <snip> My friend, I couldn't have said it any better myself. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00344.html (7,945 bytes)

23. RE: [TenTec] Re: wtb: ICtsFT2000Mk6PRO14.5 (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:29:10 -0600
Steve, Let us know if that IC-781 can do full QSK at 120 wpm, would you? I'm looking for a good ragchew rig. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00192.html (7,468 bytes)

24. RE: [TenTec] Orion bug video (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:20:13 -0600
Has nothing to do with the fact that he's trying to transmit out of band, right?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00341.html (8,319 bytes)

25. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:05:34 -0600
the maintenance of Right on! I joined this list to talk about TEN TEC, darn it, and I don't want any mention of anything else cluttering up my inbox! Ten Tec only, understand? of this list. That inc
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00416.html (12,950 bytes)

26. RE: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:42:49 -0600
Steve, It tells you that the phase noise of the Icom is 6 dB higher. This phase noise causes something called "reciprocal mixing". That's what you're hearing. But nobody cares about phase noise here.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00531.html (11,213 bytes)

27. [TenTec] Ringing in Filters at High Speed CW (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:20:47 -0600
Tom, I meant to ask you this when the subject of 100 wpm CW first came up in this thread a while ago. Thus, I have changed the name of this sub-thread. When you're receiving CW that fast, how much do
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00671.html (15,444 bytes)

28. [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 21:05:52 -0600
Now that we've established that the vast majority of CW ops strongly prefer QSK under all operating circumstances, I have a question. Do the vast majority of SSB ops strongly prefer VOX-- which is so
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00672.html (7,874 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Re: The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:19:18 -0600
Wow! Arrived home to find a barrage of replies. Very amazing replies. Let me make a couple of observations. I really wasn't trolling at all with my question, as I was just curious about an apparent d
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00729.html (8,689 bytes)

30. RE: TT Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:22:24 -0600
Tommy, Is this 500 W spike that "most radios" produce always there? If so, then what protects the grids of the tubes in the PA under normal operation? Or maybe I don't understand exactly which radios
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00834.html (10,322 bytes)

31. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:20:04 -0600
So now I'm confused. When you talk about "the ALC does not act quick enough to stop the spike", are you talking about external ALC, that is, a cable from the amp's ALC output back to the radio, or ar
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00847.html (14,517 bytes)

32. RE: TT RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:51:10 -0600
Thank you, Tommy. This thread started off discussing external ALC between rig and amp, and has ended up talking about internal ALC in the rig only. I wanted to point out this very important point. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00855.html (18,124 bytes)

33. RE: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:05:44 -0600
Just as I thought I was beginning to understand this thread, I've been thrown back into a quandary. What is the flaw in my understanding here: 1. The Orion can't send CW over 42 wpm. 2. The Omni 6 c
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00875.html (9,319 bytes)

34. RE: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:39:23 -0600
Okay. That's what I thought you said. Thank you. Again, I understood this correctly, too. Thanks for clarifying. Wow. Tom, I am certainly not calling you a liar, but there are things in this stateme
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00905.html (9,579 bytes)

35. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI v. Orion (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:01:55 -0600
Ken, You are absolutely correct. Also, it doesn't do full QSK at 100+ WPM, and because of that, it's not even a good ragchew rig any more. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01201.html (9,574 bytes)

36. RE: [TenTec] Unveiling of DR1 (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:38:18 -0600
Yeah, but it has a remote control.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00248.html (9,667 bytes)

37. RE: [TenTec] New Contest Confirmation: "EU" (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:34:03 -0600
Hi, Rick, Yep, you're right, this 'dit shortening' is very common, and you just haven't noticed it before. Please see my previous post about it at: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00332.html (7,598 bytes)

38. [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:33:13 -0600
I just saw the Icom 7800 review for the first time. Without ragging on the reviewers, because I'm sure they are all good guys, this review tells me very, very little about the electronic performance
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00453.html (9,927 bytes)

39. RE: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:55:17 -0600
Lest anyone get the wrong idea, strictly speaking the Orion is not a software-defined radio. I remember Scott at Ten Tec reiterating this point here on the reflector during an early thread on the mer
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00164.html (10,427 bytes)

40. RE: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 18:20:40 -0600
Hey, Rick! Thank you for taking the time to reply. I agree; it's a fuzzy definition right now. I work for a company that defines the cutting edge in digitization of signals and SDR and things like th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00170.html (13,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu