Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:al_lorona@agilent.com: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

41. RE: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 18:22:29 -0600
Oops, meant this for Rick, not for reflector. Sorry for bandwidth. Al
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00171.html (15,544 bytes)

42. RE: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:34:28 -0600
Wow. This is very, very interesting. Does anybody remember the uproar surrounding the Orion's price when it was first announced? Thirty-three hundred dollars, and everybody practically fainted. Just
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00264.html (9,519 bytes)

43. RE: [TenTec] Monitor (was-Contesting) (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:43:09 -0600
Blair, you reminded me of something that happened to me earlier this year. I was de-planing from a Boeing 767, and when I passed the open cockpit I stuck my head in to thank the pilots. Their displa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00286.html (8,204 bytes)

44. RE: [TenTec] Orion Operation (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:16:55 -0600
Bill, what do I know-- after all, I've never seen an Orion-- but you have put your finger on something that has baffled me... how come some folks have all kinds of problems during an upgrade and a w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00384.html (8,273 bytes)

45. RE: [TenTec] E-Ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:04:04 -0600
Ken, you have put up with it because you have no other choice! What other choice do you have? What the public has been conditioned to put up with w.r.t. Microsoft Windows is unbelieveable. Things ar
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00615.html (11,500 bytes)

46. RE: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:49:13 -0600
I wonder how important advertising in QST is to the sales of a ham radio manufacturer? If it's really, really important-- as in the primary means of letting the majority of the amateur radio communit
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00825.html (10,476 bytes)

47. [TenTec] Opinions (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 17:03:37 -0600
I have been haunted by these numbers all night and all day. It seems that when Icom stated, "Specifications subject to change," that the "Best Receiver ever made" spec was one of the ones that chang
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00851.html (7,898 bytes)

48. [TenTec] New Product Announcement (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:24:12 -0600
Icom IC-10,000 now have been always providing near perfect transceiving and superior operating experiences. When perfect blend of analog and digital circuits resulting in the unsurpassed receiver dyn
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00221.html (10,193 bytes)

49. RE: [TenTec] New radio fever (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:09:58 -0600
And... "It's over $3000!!"
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00565.html (7,864 bytes)

50. RE: [TenTec] New radio fever (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:30:18 -0600
http://antennspecialisten.se/~sm5bsz/dynrange/ssa2004/ssa2004.htm Hey, pretty good measurements. A little dirtier than IC-756 PRO but about as good as MFJ-9020 :^) Calm down, I'm only kidding! Al W6
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00571.html (8,050 bytes)

51. RE: [TenTec] Information Week Article "FCC Chairman Visits BroadbandProject" (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:47:03 -0700
It is difficult to tell exactly because of an apparent typo in the article which power lines the BPL is on. It appears that the BPL signal does not come down the 240 V drop into the home, but comes i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00215.html (9,409 bytes)

52. RE: [TenTec] Information Week Article "FCC ChairmanVisitsBroadbandProject" (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:10:11 -0700
Doesn't make sense to me, but okay, whatever. I appreciate the update, Ed. This is valuable information. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00241.html (7,336 bytes)

53. [TenTec] RE: More Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:38:51 -0700
Yuri, I hope saying this does not put me in "TT Worshipers Cult". Seriously, Orion is no longer "ultimate". That title now claimed by Brand X radio. See http://www.icom.co.jp/world/products/amateur/
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00271.html (9,271 bytes)

54. [TenTec] Barry's recordings (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:17:11 -0700
Hi, Barry, If you hadn't told me that the bandwidth was the same on both, I would have sworn that the Yaesu was set to a wide bandwidth. Maybe it's just the center frequency of the filter, which soun
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00307.html (9,680 bytes)

55. RE: [TenTec] Barry's recordings (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:31:59 -0700
Yeh, I guess you're done for the day, Barry. Have a good one. I don't know why the SSB splatter would be artifact of MP3 if all you're doing is recording audio output from the rig. Wouldn't that have
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00316.html (10,613 bytes)

56. [TenTec] 80 m Novice Band? <<Off Topic>> (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:58:14 -0700
This is an operating topic rather than a Ten Tec-specific topic. Do you remember a couple of years ago when the 80 meter Novice band was shifted down by 25 kHz to 3675 - 3725 kHz? I had thought that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00531.html (7,447 bytes)

57. [TenTec] 'Spectrum Hogs' (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:44:05 -0700
AN INTERVIEW WITH DAVID N. FORCER, the FCC's "OFFICIAL OBSERVER" As debate heats up between hams who experiment with high-quality SSB and those who deplore the practice, Ham Radio Today magazine deci
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00688.html (11,932 bytes)

58. [TenTec] New Idea (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:56:50 -0700
The correct way to adjust the drive to an amplifier is to use a two-tone test. Two audio tones are fed to the microphone input and the envelope of the RF output of the radio (or radio/amplifier combi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00855.html (9,718 bytes)

59. RE: [TenTec] two-tone transmitter signals (was "New Idea") (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 12:03:40 -0700
That's a good idea. However, I am more interested in incorporating the tone generators and oscilloscope in the transceiver itself. In the industry, this is called Built-In Test Equipment, or BITE fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00932.html (7,894 bytes)

60. RE: [TenTec] Inrad Mods/ Reply to Ken Brown (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:03:49 -0700
Ken, Two point eight kHz is "wideband"? 1. The guy who started the thread is talking about increasing his transmitted bandwidth from 2.4 kHz to 2.8 kHz. Is this increase *really* going to make that m
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00084.html (11,289 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu