Mail Archive Search: <+from:al

Results:

References: [ +from:al_lorona@agilent.com: 118 ]

Total 118 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Is My Wide Filter *Too* Wide? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:10:29 -0600; Hi, Everybody, I have wide, 2.8 kHz Inrad filters in both IFs of my Omni VI now. My transmitted SSB signal showed all the signs of an incorrect BFO insertion frequency: poor carrier rejection and poo; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00054.html (9,428 bytes)
42. [TenTec] RE: Is My Wide Filter *Too* Wide? (long and boring) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:13:25 -0600; Hi, Everybody, I'm reporting back on the carrier suppression problem in an Omni VI with two (2) Inrad 2.8 kHz crystal filters. Good operating practice dictates that you check your radio for problems; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00079.html (9,543 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Laptops and Pegasus (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:06:46 -0600; Hi, John, Are you running on battery power, and, if so, is there any chance that the power management software of the laptop is really the cause of all this? Most laptops, to conserve their battery p; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00025.html (9,260 bytes)
44. [TenTec] ARRL product review test change (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:27:54 -0600; Hi, Everybody, An interesting discussion. Practically, I can understand those who say they don't care about a spurious tone in the audio output that is so far down that it cannot interfere with norma; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00251.html (14,327 bytes)
45. [TenTec] 962 power supply speaker (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 13:45:33 -0400; Hi, Jon, I replaced that speaker in my power supply, too. The mounting nuts had been tightened down way too much and had deformed the speaker structure, causing the coil to scrape the magnet; in othe; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00002.html (8,609 bytes)
46. [TenTec] binaural CW? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:06:18 -0600; Hi, Mike, I was fortunate enough to be at a meeting last month of the ham club where Rick Campbell works up in the Portland area. I just happened to be on site on the right day and got myself invited; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00029.html (13,128 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Actual Measurements (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:11:05 -0700; Hi, Everybody, I have a couple of screen shots of some measurements I made on an Omni VI with both Ten Tec stock 2.4 kHz and International Radio 2.8 kHz filters, but since I can't post them to the re; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00109.html (6,995 bytes)
48. [TenTec] Stand By (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:25:05 -0700; Hey, folks, To all of you who have received my filter measurements... I went back and spent some more time investigating the issue of the low-to-high frequency rolloff as you saw in my screen shots a; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00128.html (7,777 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Easy to operate? (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 00:28:31 -0700; Hi, Everybody, This is a thought-provoking thread. To throw fuel on the fire: I am looking at the latest QST, at an ad for one of the latest and greatest transceivers (I won't tell you which one just; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-12/msg00125.html (7,975 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Oh, No, More On Coffee Cups (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:16:56 -0600; Yes, I know, I was getting tired of the coffee cup questions too, but then I visited the web site, and... How do you order more than one? Al W6LX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec S; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-10/msg00082.html (7,135 bytes)
51. FW: [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (Long) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (LORONA,AL (A-USA,ex3)); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 02:12:14 -0400; Hi, Jon, Thanks for asking for comments. I do have a few. Please see a previous post on this reflector (http://www.contesting.com/_tentec/200003/msg00242.html) for a perspective on frequency accuracy; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00064.html (13,078 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Accuracy (long) (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 15:02:02 -0500; Hi, Bob, I'm glad you are satisfied with the solutions to your "problems". It gives me an opportunity to pose something to the group. Hypothesis: There's nothing wrong with knobs that aren't always; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00254.html (10,819 bytes)
53. RE: [TenTec] Using Scout w/external keyer (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:22:23 -0600; Yup. Al W6LX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00568.html (6,814 bytes)
54. RE: [TenTec] groups (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:45:29 -0600; Good idea, Phil, but I'm still looking for the group for discussing other groups... oh wait, this *is* that group. Al W6LX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@c; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00200.html (7,089 bytes)
55. RE: [TenTec] Interference II (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:56:14 -0700; And Todd, make sure that it is not a switching mode power supply causing this noise. Your description is very like that of a SMPS's RFI. Al W6LX _______________________________________________ TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00924.html (7,806 bytes)
56. RE: [TenTec] Inrad Mods/ Reply to Ken Brown (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:03:49 -0700; Ken, Two point eight kHz is "wideband"? 1. The guy who started the thread is talking about increasing his transmitted bandwidth from 2.4 kHz to 2.8 kHz. Is this increase *really* going to make that m; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00084.html (10,514 bytes)
57. RE: [TenTec] Inrad Mods/ Reply to Ken Brown (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com; Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:09:04 -0700; Jerry with your permission I'd like to reproduce part of your message here. Okay, so although K0CQ didn't come out and say it, I will assume that by this and his previous paragraph, which I cut, he b; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00086.html (11,471 bytes)
58. [TenTec] Minimum power necessary (long) (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 00:18:20 -0700; Hi, Everybody, I don't think there's any question that closing down your receiver's bandwidth will lower the noise floor and improve the receive signal-to-noise ratio, up to a point of diminishing re; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00140.html (11,224 bytes)
59. RE: [TenTec]software defined radio, was "audio" (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:24:46 -0700; May I ask a dumb question? I am joining this thread late, so I apologize if this has already been addressed, but I just visited the Ten Tec web site and nowhere in the Orion pages does it say that th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00186.html (7,255 bytes)
60. [TenTec] 'Spectrum Hogs' (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:44:05 -0700; AN INTERVIEW WITH DAVID N. FORCER, the FCC's "OFFICIAL OBSERVER" As debate heats up between hams who experiment with high-quality SSB and those who deplore the practice, Ham Radio Today magazine deci; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00689.html (11,750 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]