Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:al_lorona@agilent.com: 106 ]

Total 106 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [TenTec] Inrad Mods/ Reply to Ken Brown (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:09:04 -0700
Jerry with your permission I'd like to reproduce part of your message here. Okay, so although K0CQ didn't come out and say it, I will assume that by this and his previous paragraph, which I cut, he b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00086.html (11,530 bytes)

62. [TenTec] Minimum power necessary (long) (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 00:18:20 -0700
Hi, Everybody, I don't think there's any question that closing down your receiver's bandwidth will lower the noise floor and improve the receive signal-to-noise ratio, up to a point of diminishing re
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00140.html (12,149 bytes)

63. RE: [TenTec]software defined radio, was "audio" (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:24:46 -0700
May I ask a dumb question? I am joining this thread late, so I apologize if this has already been addressed, but I just visited the Ten Tec web site and nowhere in the Orion pages does it say that th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00186.html (8,117 bytes)

64. RE: [TenTec] groups (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:45:29 -0600
Good idea, Phil, but I'm still looking for the group for discussing other groups... oh wait, this *is* that group. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00195.html (7,115 bytes)

65. RE: [TenTec] Interference II (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:56:14 -0700
And Todd, make sure that it is not a switching mode power supply causing this noise. Your description is very like that of a SMPS's RFI. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00920.html (7,601 bytes)

66. RE: [TenTec] Using Scout w/external keyer (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:22:23 -0600
Yup. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00568.html (8,310 bytes)

67. [TenTec] Product Reviews (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:25:32 -0600
Hi, Everybody, I am about to talk about some of Ten Tec's competition in a manner that will "stir the pot" and reveal a somewhat "anti-Kensucom" bias. If this is going to offend your sensibilities, p
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00145.html (10,849 bytes)

68. RE: [TenTec] Product Reviews (score: 1)
Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 23:45:12 -0600
In my third year of high school, I had a friend who passed U.S. History class by only looking at the pictures and the captions in our textbook. That is kind of how I read the QST product reviews. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00186.html (11,806 bytes)

69. [TenTec] The Near Future (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:12:56 -0600
AN INTERVIEW WITH JACK SPRAT - VICE-PRESIDENT, AMATEUR RADIO SALES, KENSUCOM, INC. CW Forever magazine caught up with Jack Sprat at his Seattle apartment to talk about the current state of amateur ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00151.html (12,154 bytes)

70. RE: [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:27:54 -0600
Now it's my turn to say, "Huh?" You mean the Ten Tec spec includes what happens in the first hour after power on? That would be highly irregular. Nobody that I know who buys a piece of test equipment
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00569.html (12,831 bytes)

71. RE: [TenTec] re: 12VDC for Peg or FD (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:37:02 -0600
Hi, Mark, This is a real issue with battery operation. Lead-acid batteries may start out at 12.6 V, but very rapidly the terminal voltage drops off more or less linearly with time. I have made disch
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00644.html (8,689 bytes)

72. [TenTec] Virtual, Actual (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:28:37 -0600
Yes! Duane, that's so funny. I have a theory on digital clocks. Whenever I see one, I have to imagine an analog clock face to get a 'feel' for what time it is. Sometimes you don't need to know that
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00840.html (11,901 bytes)

73. RE: [TenTec] E-NUFF (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 22:31:56 -0600
Man, folks always say this after one of my posts. Fine. I get the hint. Al W6LX
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00886.html (6,796 bytes)

74. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 21:11:14 -0600
One of the customary measurements in the ARRL product reviews of amateur transceivers is a screen shot of the transmitted CW waveform. In general, Ten Tec radios test favorably while other radios fre
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01173.html (8,311 bytes)

75. RE: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:49:31 -0600
Paul, I've been following very closely the digital experiments at WOR. For the rest of the folks: WOR is an AM radio station in New York. The most recent audio samples of the WOR analog and digital s
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00505.html (15,466 bytes)

76. RE: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:56:36 -0600
George, I'll take this one. While it is true that the channels are 10 kHz apart, in any one geographical area you never have two stations with adjacent channel allocations because the AM signal is wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00506.html (12,219 bytes)

77. RE: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 15:41:34 -0600
Aw, c'mon, George, that question is simply meant to provoke. You already know why! Look, I can be just as silly: For that matter, What are the advantages of transmitting a signal with more than 25 W
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00540.html (14,250 bytes)

78. RE: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:43:13 -0600
Yes, George, I'm sorry I didn't get the tone of sincerity that I should have from your post, but you gotta understand that when you follow up a post with a "Sorta hard to answer, eh?" post it casts d
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00547.html (19,376 bytes)

79. RE: [TenTec] Slightly OT: SSB vs AM (Warning!: Heavy Sarcasm) (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:51:27 -0600
Shhh, Carl, you used a bad word: fidelity. You see, almost nobody is even considering fidelity in any of these discussions. Only bandwidth. As hams, we're not suppposed to be concerned about fidelit
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00622.html (8,997 bytes)

80. RE: [TenTec] Radio Shack 25 amp switching supply? (score: 1)
Author: al_lorona@agilent.com
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:17:26 -0700
I have posted on this topic here before. You may cringe at such a blanket statement, but *all* switching mode power supplies generate noise. As users of extremely sensitive RF receiving equipment, we
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00418.html (13,497 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu