Mail Archive Search: <+from:al

Results:

References: [ +from:al_lorona@agilent.com: 118 ]

Total 118 documents matching your query.

81. RE: [TenTec] Unveiling of DR1 (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:38:18 -0600; Yeah, but it has a remote control. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00248.html (9,166 bytes)
82. RE: [TenTec] New Contest Confirmation: "EU" (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:34:03 -0600; Hi, Rick, Yep, you're right, this 'dit shortening' is very common, and you just haven't noticed it before. Please see my previous post about it at: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00332.html (7,626 bytes)
83. [TenTec] The '7800 review (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:33:13 -0600; I just saw the Icom 7800 review for the first time. Without ragging on the reviewers, because I'm sure they are all good guys, this review tells me very, very little about the electronic performance; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00453.html (9,804 bytes)
84. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:05:34 -0600; the maintenance of Right on! I joined this list to talk about TEN TEC, darn it, and I don't want any mention of anything else cluttering up my inbox! Ten Tec only, understand? of this list. That inc; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00416.html (12,325 bytes)
85. RE: [TenTec] ICOM PROII vs 6+ experiment (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:42:49 -0600; Steve, It tells you that the phase noise of the Icom is 6 dB higher. This phase noise causes something called "reciprocal mixing". That's what you're hearing. But nobody cares about phase noise here.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00531.html (10,603 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Ringing in Filters at High Speed CW (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 18:20:47 -0600; Tom, I meant to ask you this when the subject of 100 wpm CW first came up in this thread a while ago. Thus, I have changed the name of this sub-thread. When you're receiving CW that fast, how much do; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00671.html (14,862 bytes)
87. [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 21:05:52 -0600; Now that we've established that the vast majority of CW ops strongly prefer QSK under all operating circumstances, I have a question. Do the vast majority of SSB ops strongly prefer VOX-- which is so; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00672.html (7,214 bytes)
88. [TenTec] Re: The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:19:18 -0600; Wow! Arrived home to find a barrage of replies. Very amazing replies. Let me make a couple of observations. I really wasn't trolling at all with my question, as I was just curious about an apparent d; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00729.html (8,778 bytes)
89. RE: TT Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:22:24 -0600; Tommy, Is this 500 W spike that "most radios" produce always there? If so, then what protects the grids of the tubes in the PA under normal operation? Or maybe I don't understand exactly which radios; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00834.html (9,742 bytes)
90. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:20:04 -0600; So now I'm confused. When you talk about "the ALC does not act quick enough to stop the spike", are you talking about external ALC, that is, a cable from the amp's ALC output back to the radio, or ar; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00847.html (14,290 bytes)
91. RE: TT RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:51:10 -0600; Thank you, Tommy. This thread started off discussing external ALC between rig and amp, and has ended up talking about internal ALC in the rig only. I wanted to point out this very important point. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00855.html (17,719 bytes)
92. RE: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:05:44 -0600; Just as I thought I was beginning to understand this thread, I've been thrown back into a quandary. What is the flaw in my understanding here: 1. The Orion can't send CW over 42 wpm. 2. The Omni 6 c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00875.html (7,920 bytes)
93. RE: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:39:23 -0600; Okay. That's what I thought you said. Thank you. Again, I understood this correctly, too. Thanks for clarifying. Wow. Tom, I am certainly not calling you a liar, but there are things in this stateme; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00905.html (8,159 bytes)
94. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI v. Orion (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:01:55 -0600; Ken, You are absolutely correct. Also, it doesn't do full QSK at 100+ WPM, and because of that, it's not even a good ragchew rig any more. Al W6LX _______________________________________________ TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01201.html (9,712 bytes)
95. RE: [TenTec] Re: wtb: ICtsFT2000Mk6PRO14.5 (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:29:10 -0600; Steve, Let us know if that IC-781 can do full QSK at 120 wpm, would you? I'm looking for a good ragchew rig. Al W6LX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00195.html (7,503 bytes)
96. RE: [TenTec] Orion bug video (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:20:13 -0600; Has nothing to do with the fact that he's trying to transmit out of band, right? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00344.html (8,493 bytes)
97. RE: [TenTec] Power Supplies (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:08:30 -0700; And Gene, not only is your Astron quiet, but it is also RF quiet, too. No matter what anybody says, all switching mode power supplies put out RF noise. Some guys don't know what it sounds like, so t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00090.html (7,894 bytes)
98. [TenTec] QSK with QSK-5PC (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:01:13 -0700; Would someone who has successfully connected an Omni VI to an Ameritron amplifier equipped with the internal QSK-5PC board be willing to contact me off the list? I want to know how you connected the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00167.html (7,507 bytes)
99. RE: [TenTec] QSK with QSK-5PC (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:01:42 -0700; Hi, Steve, I believe I know why the previous owner did that to your Omni VI. (And I'm assuming you care!) Last night I made some measurements of the TX Enable signal on the back panel of the Omni VI.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00178.html (11,654 bytes)
100. RE: [TenTec] QSK/QRQ problem with Orion / ACOM 2000A (score: 1): Author: <al_lorona@agilent.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:30:31 -0700; And Barry, you sounded great out here on the west coast. The keying was flawless. Al W6LX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00250.html (10,785 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]