Mail Archive Search: <+from:aldermant@alltel.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Titan III opinions wanted (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:33:54 -0400; I had a Titan 425. Under pretty hard useage, i.e., contesting, DXing, and high speed CW, the thing was like a tank. Worked really well and very reliable. Today's 'problem' with that amp is the final; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00270.html (8,759 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ calibration (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:18:57 -0400; Hi Dick, The answer to your question is yes and no!! If your dial accuracy is off by 300 hz, then yes, you calibrate the master oscillator, which is either a TCXO or an oven heated xtal oscillator. B; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00374.html (8,199 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI FSK for psk? (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:06:15 -0400; I think you will find 'rtty/fsk' completely independant to PSK31 on an Omni 6. PSK and your sound card is fed into the 'Audio In' RCA connector, for xmit and your rigs Audio Out RCA connector should; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00011.html (8,537 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Filters for Sale (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:24:31 -0400; Hi Art, I would like to purchase your #218 and your #219 filters. Please let me know if a personal check is OK and I'll get it in the mail tomorrow, assuming the filters have not been sold yet! 161,; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00394.html (7,952 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Model 585 Alignment problem (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:32:02 -0400; I just went through this on both of my Omni 6+ rigs and 'assume' the Paragon would be the same. Turn the PBT knob fully clockwise and adjust C24 for 15.3015 MHz. Now center the PBT knob and adjust R1; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00454.html (8,502 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] dual receivers CORRECTION (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:05:03 -0400; Ken, I have to partially disagree with your comment about split-band operation with the Omni 6. I use both the Omni 6 and the Plus and have had semi-QSK working quite well at about 30 wpm, on 40/80 a; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00581.html (12,047 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] "Being a Contrarian . . ." (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:04:02 -0400; Tom - W4BQF Short timer! :-) There's precious little of anything that actually quite lives up to the marketing hype in every respect. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00028.html (7,224 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 10:14:53 -0400; "Urban myths die hard. Sometimes, they become articles of faith -- or entire religious movements, burning heretics at the stake. If I were the current team at T-T, I'd just want to slap somebody :-); /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00029.html (10,251 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:50:21 -0400; I personally don't think your "useless contribution" is useless. Maybe some of the 'Monday morning quarterbacks' inputs on 'this is the way TT should do it' is useless however. Regardless of who or w; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00093.html (12,909 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:20:42 -0400; Deer Mr. Addams, Thanks for your very informative 'facts'. Most likely those of us who use this reflector have owned and been dealing with TT for some 20 to 30 years and I'm sure some of us were unaw; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00095.html (16,713 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:55:39 -0400; And I want to be the first to go or record and tell ya'll that it works flawless for me and I've never had any problems. So ya'll either don't have the right kind of antenna, or you don't know how to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00155.html (10,901 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] On being a satisified customer (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:29:37 -0400; John.... Having used the Omni 6, and now two Omni 6 Plus rigs since 1992, I'm sitting here trying to recall if there is ANYTHING to gripe about with these radios!! I am very critical about the radios; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00195.html (11,883 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] On being a satisified customer (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 08:07:16 -0400; Yep...that could be somewhat of a limitation with noisy/weak signal conditions. I do find my #221 filter to be pretty good down at 400hz. I haven't looked into it, but it might not be too much of a p; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00273.html (8,567 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 600hz Roofing Filter for OMNI VI+ (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:31:50 -0400; Hi Bill, I have two Omni 6 Plus rigs, fully filtered for CW and both rigs have the 600hz roofing filter. One rig has the 750 hz offset and my main radio has a 500hz offset. When you can drop 30 over; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00318.html (9,424 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II and SWR meter reading (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:28:23 -0400; Pat and Allen and Denton.... What you are seeing is pretty normal, with the exception of the AGC or the (rcvr) RF gain affecting the readings. First it's helpful to realize that you are using ham equ; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00406.html (13,358 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Omni 7 Specs??? (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:52:45 -0400; From the Omni VII TenTec web site specs: "Our new Distributed Roofing Filter architecture places narrow filters in both the 1st and 2nd IFs at just the right places. " !!! I've always thought that th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00822.html (7,956 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Orion time domain issues, QSK (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 22:31:11 -0400; I got interested in time delay while trying to make sense of ionospheric backscatter echoes. The Orion makes a fair radar set, but you have to understand how it is delaying the Rx signal. This sheds; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00149.html (9,238 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Omni 6 Plus Roofing Filter (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:40 -0400; Anyone interested in some pictures of the installation (and mods) of the Inrad roofing filter and spectragram plots of the audio output spectrum with and without filters can see these at my wed site:; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00230.html (7,041 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ obsolete parts ? (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:39:56 -0400; T-T Gang, I recently acquired a Omni 6+ loaded with CW filters and the Inrad CW roofing filter - I LOVE IT! :-) And, easy to work on, even with these old eyes (actually "eye"). Question for the grou; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00388.html (9,689 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] PA Design (score: 1): Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:51:52 -0400; Yea...well TT used to sell an AirPac circuit breaker that was very fast. You were supposed to have it in your DC power line if you were not using a TT power supply. They had some kind of peak current; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00448.html (8,697 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]