Mail Archive Search: <+from:aldermant@alltel.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] Orion upgrade what am I doing wrong (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 08:50:12 -0400; Yep..My new PC broke after one month so I went back to my old Win98SE PC to do the update. I first deleted my previous update from this PC, then ran the 1.37 update with no problem. I very vaguely re; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00649.html (10,449 bytes)
102. Re: [TenTec] Orion external keying not (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:20:52 -0400; Steve, That warning shows up if you have the rise time set for >5ms. Just today, I was testing my set up at 70 wpm using externally generated CW with my PC and keying the center pin of the KEY input; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00675.html (7,962 bytes)
103. Re: [TenTec] new TenTec software 3.170 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 04:40:17 -0400; Joe... I am very critical user of full QSK in CW. With v1.37 just installed, the full QSK on my Orion seems to be pretty much flawless. I do some high speed stuff and just today checked it out at 70; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00676.html (8,231 bytes)
104. Re: [TenTec] new TenTec software 3.170 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 13:38:56 -0400; Could be, but I don't believe so. Quite a few times with my Orion set at 3ms rise time, I have asked my QSO partner to check for clicks, both above and below my frequency, both running barefoot at 10; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00685.html (9,441 bytes)
105. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 21:34:57 -0400; Nope. I'll have to confess to you and all, I do not sit around and test full QSK between dits!! When I say my Orion QSK works good at 70 wpm, what I really mean is that if my QSO partner breaks me, I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00695.html (10,382 bytes)
106. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:40:40 -0400; what the MFJ 493 keyer says is 60 - and with what the internal keyer says is 60. So I certainly have QSK - at speeds higher than I ever want to run. When it comes to CW I prefer city speed limits to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00711.html (10,690 bytes)
107. Re: [TenTec] ??QSK GONE AWAY (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 09:52:48 -0400; Well, it is a 'requirement' to run full QSK at the higher speeds, as far as I'm concerned. No one needs to be able to hear between the dits, but you do need to hear between the words. But Ken, if you; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00713.html (9,912 bytes)
108. Re: [TenTec] computer CW my Argonaut V??? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:29:49 -0400; I have been using YPlog for a little over three years. YPlog gives you the option of using the sound card generated CW audio, or the parallel port. I chose to use the sound card CW generation simply; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00732.html (8,729 bytes)
109. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 software (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:39:47 -0400; Nope, not all of us did. v1.37 working OK for me, but I'm just a plain ole CW guy! Main thing I don't like is v1.37 killed about 15 wpm off of the top end sending speed, so it's now limited to about; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00918.html (9,064 bytes)
110. Re: [TenTec] QSK speed versus firmwave version (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 11:49:08 -0400; Interesting Barry! I have no clue why my Orion with v1.37 seems to be working quite well, but it is. I'm in the WPX contest now and running between 26 and 32 wpm and can clearly hear anything on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00941.html (8,796 bytes)
111. Re: [TenTec] Orion Loss of Receive Audio F/W 1.370 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 22:42:05 -0400; Sri to hear that Alan. I've had mine going full blast since the start of WPX and no problems so far. Working split VFO with the scope turned on and have been doing both RUN and S&P, so far everything; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00964.html (9,022 bytes)
112. [TenTec] Re: Cool Orion (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 06:11:20 -0400; Several weeks ago I posted a simple mod that I made to my Orion. That was to remove the internal speaker and add a 12vdc computer fan. One of the things I quickly noticed was the darkened left side o; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00978.html (8,271 bytes)
113. Re: [TenTec] Cool Orion (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 22:19:50 -0400; Hi Jack, That's good to hear. My Orion is completely open on all sides, I use the TT heatsink fan, and I very seldom run more than 30 to 40 watts into my Titan 3. I think this is a heat build-up issu; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00996.html (9,959 bytes)
114. Re: [TenTec] Re: Cool Orion (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 22:23:40 -0400; Hi Rich, Good sugestion! I power my Orion with an Astron 12vdc@ 75 amp power supply and I monitor the +13.8vdc at all times with an LCD voltmeter tied across the input power connector at the back of; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00997.html (11,460 bytes)
115. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ memory LED question (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 01:22:35 -0400; Congrats on the 'new' Omni 6+, I'll bet your gonna like it!! Before going too far, remove the top cover and reseat the connectors on the back of the readout board. Sometimes they get 'dirty', sometim; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00001.html (8,869 bytes)
116. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:21:49 -0400; I wish everyone would read the below statements over and over again until it is firmly implanted in their mind. HAM RADIO's are not the equipment to be discussing cycles of frequency accuracy. When y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00138.html (9,324 bytes)
117. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Antennas (was Radials) (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:23:07 -0400; The best place to get answers on antenna questions is on the Tower Talk reflector. In my opinion, the best place to get informed information on vertical radiators is from a site where it's owner is t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00205.html (9,660 bytes)
118. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:51:29 -0400; Strange...I operated the entire WPX CW test in the split VFO mode, for 1024 Q's and didn't have to reboot once. Seems to me v1.37 fixed that problem. Tom - W4BQF _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00215.html (8,587 bytes)
119. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 19:54:24 -0400; Actual on the air observation has shown over the past month that 20 mtrs is a better band than either 40 or 80m. Significantly less QRN and much more activity. 20m is frequently open until about 4am,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00228.html (9,450 bytes)
120. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:00:43 -0400; Doesn't require an expert!! Just listening works. Concur that 20m has been quite good late into the mornings. Very good signals from UA0 and UA9 land. Not very many JA sigs, but around 4am Hawaii sig; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00230.html (11,520 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]