Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] voltage stablizer?? (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:55:19 -0400
Hi Dave, I was not aware that Phil/K4DPK had a voltage stabilizer kit, but I do know he has a frequency stabilizer kit for the older Ten Tec rigs. My good friend purchased one and installed it in his
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01183.html (8,057 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] Orion Filters (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:04:48 -0400
Scott, You have already gotten some good inputs on the Ten Tec filters and Inrad filter for the Orion, but I'll add a little. I think that during the design stages of the Orion, Ten Tec realized that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01206.html (11,339 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] 30 day Return Policy (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:16:52 -0400
No, if that is the way you see fit to interpret it, then you are not missing anything. Tommy - W4BQF No offense, but how does that affect your freedom of speech? It's a result of that freeedom (in Eh
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01208.html (9,837 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Orion Filters (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:23:34 -0400
Yes Buck, I think it would restrict SSB operation to the point in would be very unsatisfactory. But of course filter selection and where you install them should be determined only by how the individu
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01228.html (9,288 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] Orion's Woes (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:32:50 -0400
"So I just don't get it. " Well, I certainly agree with your statement Lee. Tommy - W4BQF None of the serious test measurements done on the Orion use the cascade filter board, one of the design flaws
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01229.html (10,585 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1st Year of Use (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:00:55 -0400
Toby, Just to set the record clear, the rest of us beta firmware testers do not publish information on beta firmware releases simply because Ten Tec specifically ask that we NOT share the information
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00077.html (13,770 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1st Year of Use (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:50:00 -0400
My source of the info I sent to Toby on this subject came, not from me, but directly to the folks to whom I'm spoken with at Ten Tec. If they are incorrect, so be it. It does not detract from the fin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00117.html (13,034 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] Horizontal loop for 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:25:51 -0400
Hmmmm...not sure what using multi turns would accomplish. Do you have any specific reason for wanting to try multi-turns? I'm interested because I'm thinking about putting up either a 160m or 80m ful
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00121.html (9,395 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] Horizontal loop for 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:15:05 -0400
I'm pretty fortunate in that my retirement QTH is on some 14 acres. The 'problem' is that most of the trees are too tall as I understand that horizontal loops should be at about 35-40' in height. I a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00131.html (10,539 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Horizontal loop for 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 20:55:33 -0400
Without looking it up again, I believe a dipole is supposed to be something like 2.71 dB gain over an isotropic, therefore its 14.7 dBi minus 2.71 dB for the gain over a dipole. However my dipole ref
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00162.html (10,097 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] Horizontal loop for 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 04:14:37 -0400
Thanks...can't ground reflection and/or conductivity also be additive? The 'drawback' to this array is it's beam width is 38 degrees. Tommy W4BQF Make that gain of a dipole over Isotropic ~ 2.1 dB ..
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00175.html (10,116 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] Horizontal loop for 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 06:56:25 -0400
Nope. Actually it was modeled with Eznec, for optimum height above ground and with local ground conditions here is Cook County. Went for optimum gain spacing as down here F/B is not an important cons
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00200.html (10,520 bytes)

113. [TenTec] W9FCX (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:16:19 -0400
How are those filters working out in your Plus? Tommy W4BQF
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00460.html (6,541 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] Should I buy an Orion now or wait (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:44:02 -0400
Toby, Time base jitter is something the Orion has when transmitting. I assume it is only connected to the generation of CW as I only briefly tested mine maybe two times on SSB. It is present however
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00468.html (8,723 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] Should I buy an Orion now or wait (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:49:38 -0400
Hmmmmm...if one is not going to touch any of the programmable options for six months, how does one ascertain, within 30 days, whether or not the rig is 'good enough' to keep? Tommy W4BQF Sometimes I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00470.html (8,693 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] Should I buy an Orion now or wait (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:25:04 -0400
Thanks for your suggestion. Fortunately/unfortunately I sold my Orion within the past six months, after doing resets for some two years. My Omni 6 Plus (with Inrad 600 hz roofing filter), so far has
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00473.html (8,286 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] re should i buy an orion now (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:22:42 -0400
No Rob. I can assure you that you are not the only person with that opinion. Tommy W4BQF <<<Look in the book for the Master reset command, then have a ball, mess it up, reset, mess it up again and Re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00483.html (9,132 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] re should i buy an orion now (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:36:58 -0400
Bill...thanks very much for your comments. Just to correct your insinuation, I own one Icom IC-781. All of the rest of my radio equipment is Ten Tec. My present full time radio is an Omni 6 Plus with
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00486.html (12,028 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] service (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:36:12 -0400
The last time I sent my Omni 6 in to Ten Tec, I was told by the service manage that in-warranty units were worked on immediately. However non-warranty units would take a minimum of four to six weeks
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00511.html (9,473 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] re should i buy an orion now (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:08:00 -0400
Did you bring CATFISHWO with you? I don't think you have a clue what you are saying. I am the 'fellow' who actually measured the jitter on the Orion. I have never said it happens on ANY other radio.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00581.html (13,345 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu