Mail Archive Search: <+from:aldermant@alltel.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

121. [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:24:20 -0400; OK...now that you have all of those very informative opinions, what conclusion do you draw? Or do you just draw a glass of beer and drop the subject? hihi... One thing that was pointed out was that n; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00236.html (8,381 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 04:58:32 -0400; True. But that only works for 1/8th wave radials. For 1/4wave radials you need to plant carrots, which of course allows you to see further. Tom - W4BQF 30. antenna. to _______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00243.html (10,297 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:34:12 -0400; But you would have been paying that $500 more for a color monitor for which that displayed spectrum analysis is practically useless. No thanks, I like mine just the way it is. Tom - W4BQF about an __; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00263.html (10,876 bytes)
124. [TenTec] v1.371 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:14:45 -0400; This firmware update thing is working!! Was running v1.370 with no real problems. Did a master reset, ran the update, did another master reset (overkill !!). The selection of items in the menu now wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00296.html (6,862 bytes)
125. Re: [TenTec] Re: Update 1.371 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 22:24:17 -0400; Seems like most of the download problems are created in one's own PC. Running anti-virus and such seems to play havoc with these downloads. Have been doing the downloads since last July with no probl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00317.html (7,821 bytes)
126. [TenTec] Problems with v1.371? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:33:14 -0400; I was working a JA this morning on 20m and he sounded like he was at least S-9 +10db, but when I looked at the S-mtr, he was not even moving the meter! Really nice! I seem to be having an audio probl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00327.html (7,150 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] Problems with v1.371? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:43:25 -0400; U mean I have to be able to real also? the the the _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00330.html (9,056 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] Orion with - Centurion VS Alpha 91B? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:06:53 -0400; No one has that problem. Read the instructions. W4BQF way the go the are _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00365.html (13,444 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] Orion Operation (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:02:07 -0400; Al, I think what this says out loud is to always be your OWN judge when learning to use a new radio. The Orion takes considerable study; it is quite a different device from what we, as hams, have pur; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00390.html (9,619 bytes)
130. [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 06:11:31 -0400; I think that all of this defending the Orion points out two things about us hams. First, no matter what radio we own, since it is on our desk, it IS by far the best radio ever built, bar none, by any; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00418.html (11,054 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:44:49 -0400; Duane and Buck... Thanks very much for your suggestions and comments. I received my Orion in July of last year and it's been on probably more time than it's been off. Prior to firmware update v1.370,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00437.html (10,788 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:48:48 -0400; Buck, I read somewhere recently, and it may have been on this reflector, that one of the beta testers, a guy who is well known for hating key clicks on 160 mtrs, said that firmware v1.371 completely; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00438.html (8,883 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] Unfinished (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:00:49 -0400; Unfortunately you are quite correct. The Orion specs mention that CW rise time is adjustable from 3ms to 10ms...which it is NOT. The MENU SELECTION is adjustable from 3ms to 10ms, but the rf waveform; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00440.html (7,987 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:10:20 -0400; I'm aware of that, but some people who do all the hard work, like to report their findings themselves. Tom - W4BQF 160 the _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00443.html (10,586 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:32:44 -0400; I understand what your thinking. But I don't think RFI issues would show up only when you install a firmware update? I also do not think (could be wrong however) I have a ground loop problem. I have; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00449.html (10,438 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:36:59 -0400; About 7'. What proof do I have that there is a problem there? Secondly, I do not want to waste 1 to 1.5dB loss in a 2KW balun. Why are you 'pushing' balun's to 'fix' a problem that occurred only afte; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00451.html (9,228 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:08:49 -0400; Sorry, but I'm not discounting any of the suggestions offered. I am reading each of them very closely as I asked for such inputs. However you are correct in that no one else has said 'me too'. But Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00461.html (10,997 bytes)
138. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:16:15 -0400; I agree with what you are saying Bob. Can you offer an explanation as to why it did not change these same parameters you mention when I set the audio L/R/Spkr to MAIN and it does happen when I have t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00462.html (14,562 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Orion Finished? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:44:03 -0400; No Buck, it does not. It only appears when useing the Orion and Titan and when running v1.371 AND have the audio menu set at factory default. As I said several times this problem does not exist when; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00468.html (9,126 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] On Grounding (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:24:55 -0400; I have a well worn copy of this book and it is excellent. Recommend it to anyone planning for lightning ground systems. Tom - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00514.html (8,273 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]