Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Orion and TRLog (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:24:31 -0400
A real 'true-grit' contester!! I love it and bet you a bowl of fresh made south Georgia grits I can whup you're a** in a contest...well, at least I can DREAM about doing it! Hihi ! Never won but one
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00119.html (8,169 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] New Orion Owners (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:36:02 -0400
Everybody has their own experience and their own opinion Jim! Tommy W4BQF Really Tommy even as a "plug&play" rig it still would beat the pants off of all the others available!!! And besides buying th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00160.html (13,389 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] Omni D and RF preamp on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy Alderman" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:07:00 -0400
Generally, what I do is vary the rcvr RF gain so the S-mtr just breaks S-1 or S-2 and leave it at that level. In most cases, this will give you max rcvr gain with the least band noise. You have to ty
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00212.html (8,871 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] Popping Noise from Orion and Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:36:17 -0400
If you think that is a 'pretty big loss', what do you think is the loss of a single PL-259 connector? Tommy W4BQF "that they noted the RX loss of the amp as .19 dB at 14 MHz." That seems like a prett
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00221.html (12,410 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Popping Noise from Orion and Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 07:21:25 -0400
Ken is correct (per normal!). When you are setting up a station or antenna system, if you pay attention to ALL of the 0.19dB losses in your interface cables and your coax, you are building your stati
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00227.html (9,876 bytes)

146. [TenTec] 'Real CW?' (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 07:50:17 -0400
I only disagree with Paul/W8KC on this one statement: "This is also what I claim as what will be the root cause of the ultimate demise of CW. It's just too much of a bother to work toward CW proficie
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00228.html (10,368 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?' (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:55:51 -0400
Yep Paul...I did read your entire email and thought it was a great post! Tommy W4BQF Actually Tommy, if you go back and read my entire email you'll see that we are in violent agreement. :-) 73 =p= w8
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00234.html (9,392 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 (Option 1) Intermittent Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:08:05 -0400
In addition to checking the headphone connections, if you get to a complete failure, then solving that becomes much more simple, IF you have the tools. Of course with an o'scope, you could quickly lo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00304.html (10,536 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:56:51 -0400
Good theory Jerome, but I disagree with it! When I try to sing, I am ask to be quiet, I play no musical instrument, and I'm tone deaf! And I have known a deaf person who could copy code via vibration
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00354.html (11,498 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:54:08 -0400
Me also! You know if they are trying to regulate by bandwidth, they have something up there sleeve that probably is not going to be good for the hobby! Tommy W4BQF Guess I just get nervous with some
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00358.html (10,500 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:12:25 -0400
Not sure who your addressing, but I'll say a few more words on this subject, as some of the other folks don't like to talk about Ten Tec's greatest attribute. Paul, I just have one question. When you
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00378.html (12,101 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:02:08 -0400
Larry, Come get on 7.024 with us each morning about 7:30am and you can personally meet them. Tommy W4BQF When I QSO at 70 wpm Tommy, 70 wpm is a pretty good clip. Just whom do you qso with at this sp
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00381.html (8,627 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] Real CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:21:52 -0400
Jim, Since you copied one of my post, I'll respond to you. This is your hobby and it is also my hobby. What I do in this hobby is for the enjoyment of it. Quite frankly, I really don't care if you or
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00390.html (12,274 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" -- TenTec Repair Cycle? (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:24:38 -0400
Tommy W4BQF Paul Clinton told me non-warranty repair takes a minimum of three weeks before they can look at the rig. In November, last, it required six weeks to repair my Omni 6 Plus. In warranty sys
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00391.html (9,264 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] cw creation (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:10:57 -0400
Continuous Wave. Tommy W4BQF How does the FCC define CW? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00626.html (16,030 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] Orion reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:25:14 -0400
That is correct...there has been no news of engineering changes. However when you send your rig in for work, quite a few 'updates' are installed in the rig. Tommy W4BQF The last batch is the same as
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00702.html (8,223 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] K4DPK VFO Stabilizer (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:34:30 -0400
Larry.... My friend Lyle/W9FCX has kit in his Corsair 2. I work him pretty often and I have never heard a Corsair 2 stay as stable as his, even from a cold start. There seems to be no warm up drift,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00703.html (7,793 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] Comparisons of Relay noise in Ten-Tec Amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:02:24 -0500
Yes, you can deaden the noise somewhat. I removed the bracket, enlarged the mounting hole, and added a rubber grommet. Just make sure the grommet is a tight fit on the relay. This did not eliminate t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00094.html (9,270 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] ORION CW relay loudness (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:18:44 -0500
Do you have your speaker hooked up? (Sorry..couldn't resist) Tom - W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thurs
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00121.html (8,268 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] Reflector (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:20:40 -0500
John.... What you was sent was an email address for a non-existant orion reflector. orion@contesting.com is an email address, not a URL. Actually I think what was being referred to was the orion refl
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00122.html (9,096 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu