Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 27, Issue 77 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:09:44 -0500
That's very hard to believe because for folks who intentionally do that, there are ways to interfere with them also. I just don't think a big gun contest station, a guy who spends thousand's of hours
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00779.html (10,517 bytes)

182. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter CW Sked (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 06:13:58 -0500
Suggest you contact Brett / KI4DBK at ki4dbk@yahoo.com as he is using his Jupiter, running full QSK up as high as 50 wpm. I'm pretty sure he would set up a sked with you so you can hear it running at
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00036.html (7,969 bytes)

183. Re: [TenTec] Re: Paragon Question - Lack of sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:37:07 -0500
I'm not sure about the Paragon, but the Omni 6 series radios do use cheap JA pin-diodes. (which turned out to be the best one's to use!) I fell for the idea of replacing all of the Ten Tec installed
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00060.html (12,603 bytes)

184. Re: [TenTec] Re: Paragon Question - Lack of sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:12:45 -0500
P/N BA 482 Tom - W4BQF What diodes do they use? I'm not sure about the Paragon, but the Omni 6 series radios do use cheap JA pin-diodes. (which turned out to be the best one's to use!) I fell for the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00074.html (13,883 bytes)

185. Re: [TenTec] Dead Reflector? (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 19:37:04 -0500
Yep...I'm getting ready for it...nice cool bottle of '87 wine and some awsome cheese...come on over? Tom - W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent:
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00135.html (8,068 bytes)

186. Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:22:01 -0500
This is my opinion only! I think it's becoming obvious that what the ham radio user community wants in a radio has changed to more 'glitz' that actual operational performance. Ten Tec probably design
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00288.html (13,352 bytes)

187. Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:15:03 -0500
Hi Bernard, And I think we are hitting on the issues that make it very difficult for a (any) manufacturer to produce a product, i.e., differences of opinion. I vaguely recall Ten Tec did an on-line s
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00296.html (18,604 bytes)

188. Re: [TenTec] TT (Orion) Future improvements!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:01:58 -0500
"Is offering something and having it work poorly better than not offering it at all?" Absolutely...if your a salesman. Absolutely not...if you are a user. Tom - W4BQF I wonder if it would have been w
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00304.html (20,781 bytes)

189. Re: [TenTec] Orion versus ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:44:50 -0500
Hello Dan, Yes, the menu is rather intuitive. The key factor especially with programmable AGC, something previously not available to users, users must take some time to study the manual and various d
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00306.html (8,606 bytes)

190. Re: [TenTec] Corsair2 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:42:25 -0500
Thanks Malcolm...very good post! Hope you don't mind but I forwarded this to an old friend of mine who has the 'flickering digit' problem on his Corsair 2. Very good info! 73, Tom - W4BQF Salut every
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00398.html (9,391 bytes)

191. Re: [TenTec] Help--New Omni D Ser B owner needs help (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:13:35 -0500
Scott.... Check the soldering on the bottom of the board where Q3 is located. Older Ten Tec rig's are infamous for bad soldering joints. Good luck with it. Tom - W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "S
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00531.html (9,088 bytes)

192. Re: [TenTec] Orion & Tune button (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:07:50 -0500
Mark.... I think the process you describe is correct, but the numbers may be wrong. For an Orion without an internal tuner, as you state, pushing the TUNE button is supposed to produce a fixed 20 wat
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00723.html (10,910 bytes)

193. Re: [TenTec] Orion & Tune button (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:37:17 -0500
Right !! My RF Applications power meter shows the same thing. The Orion's RF output indication is a relative indication. Tom - W4BQF My Orion meter reads 40w out, but the RF Applications power meter
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00730.html (14,199 bytes)

194. Re: [TenTec] Orion on the way (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:43:35 -0500
Hi Jim and congrats on getting an Orion, I think what Ten Tec is telling you is that the Orion is quite different from other ham radios, and it really requires reading the manual, several times, and
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00191.html (9,517 bytes)

195. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI plus quirk? (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:55:21 -0500
If it's new to you, I would suggest you remove the top and bottom cover and make sure all the connectors are firmly seated as they sure can come loose during shipment. Also make sure the logic chips
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00274.html (9,494 bytes)

196. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:33:23 -0500
And there is no rechargeably battery in the Omni 6 series of rigs. At one time Ten Tec performed a mod on the Omni 6 so it would have +12vdc applied to the xtal oven,(to help improve frequency stabil
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00285.html (10,188 bytes)

197. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:40:12 -0500
That is correct. The N4PY software is the 'work-around' for poorly executed firmware. Tom - W4BQF There is great potential here if only we can exploit it! Just compare the N4PY software to the pale b
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00720.html (9,985 bytes)

198. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:08:45 -0500
In my opinion, I certainly do agree with Rick. I especially agree with Rick that I would like to see Ten Tec concentrate on fixing the remaining firmware bugs BEFORE any new features are added to the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00741.html (16,501 bytes)

199. Re: [TenTec] Orion reset (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:12:41 -0500
John, Are you using a Ten Tec amp? Do you use it in the keying loop for QSK? If the answer to those questions is 'yes', then you probably do not have a defective unit. My Orion has been doing that fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00764.html (11,417 bytes)

200. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:49:26 -0500
That happens pretty normally with Ten Tec amps. The 'reason' is the padder and the blocking caps have poor temp coefficients. Solution is to replace those caps with X5V temp coefficient capacitors...
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00853.html (9,223 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu