- 221. Re: [TenTec] OT: M-Cubed Electronix Semiconductor Analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:31:04 -0500
- Just add .com to the URL and it works. Should be www.m3electronix.com Tom - W4BQF COULDN'T OPEN IT PHIL, Mac David S. McCallum/USAF RET./CMSGT/W7sac/4 -- Original Message -- From: "Phil Cuellar" <pjc
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00018.html (10,774 bytes)
- 222. Re: [TenTec] OT: M-Cubed Electronix Semiconductor Analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:33:16 -0500
- Yea..but it's late David!! Their stuff looks pretty interesting. Tom - W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "David S.McCallum" <w7sac2@cox.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 01,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00021.html (12,518 bytes)
- 223. Re: [TenTec] First DSP IF Corsair II? (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:53:15 -0500
- Really NEAT!! Ham radio is alive and well at Duane's QTH. Congrats on the 'playing'...could be very interesting! Tom - W4BQF I don't know if any one else has done this before but I have created a DSP
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00114.html (11,781 bytes)
- 224. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Ten Tec Filters 217 and 219 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 23:58:52 -0500
- Tim, Having tried what you want to try, if your a CW operator, let me suggest you follow a suggestion by Bill, W4ZV. Get the Inrad 600Hz roofing filter. As I don't operate SSB very often, I removed t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00173.html (9,517 bytes)
- 225. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Ten Tec Filters 217 and 219 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:09:46 -0500
- This is just my personal preference, but I think a 600hz roofing filter for CW is ideal. And with the switch point changes, with the 600hz roofing filter switched in, you have DSP bandwidth of 290hz
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00183.html (12,971 bytes)
- 226. Re: [TenTec] Re: New Orion Update (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:29:01 -0500
- There are many of these things that have shown up in testing. The guys in the beta test group are very sharp and they do not miss much! However, at some point Ten Tec has to stop 'fixing' and get a r
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00199.html (9,599 bytes)
- 227. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:46:05 -0500
- Hmmmm....this is a strange sounding post to the reflector....just seems to me like I've heard this very same thread back in the spring or maybe even before that. Eric, you are correct, unfortunately.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00307.html (12,196 bytes)
- 228. [TenTec] Re: Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 19:08:35 -0500
- "As an innocent bystander in this whole thing, I feel the pain of those who are experiencing problems, and I can't for the life of me understand it when one guy tells another, "I don't have that prob
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00311.html (8,661 bytes)
- 229. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:51:56 -0500
- Benard, Since the problems are firmware related, then 100% of the Orions that are kept updated, have the problem. The fact that you have "NO" problems, speaks for itself. Tom - W4BQF -- Original Mess
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00332.html (11,438 bytes)
- 230. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:17:44 -0500
- Naw...just the same old stuff like you just reported on TTBUG....nothing much new... Tom - W4BQF Benard, Since the problems are firmware related, then 100% of the Orions that are kept updated, have t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00338.html (10,150 bytes)
- 231. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:15:17 -0500
- Good idea. Tom - W4BQF Right, we're talking about m-i-n-o-r stuff like N1JM said. Tom, I know you've had your problem interfacing with the Titan III but I really wish you wouldn't reach for the fuel
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00354.html (8,692 bytes)
- 232. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Opt. 3 Stopped Transmitting (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:25:16 -0500
- Also see if it will transmit when you push the TUNE button. If it does, do the obvious and check your keying line. If it does not, see if you are drawing any current when you push the tune button. If
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00428.html (10,214 bytes)
- 233. Re: [TenTec] Noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:27:05 -0500
- Don't forget its Christmas time. I would look out the windows and see if you can observe some neighbors new Christmas lights in sync with that noise! Tom - W4BQF TT'ers, I have some ugly new noise at
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00437.html (9,444 bytes)
- 234. Re: [TenTec] Orion Mic Woe's (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:37:06 -0500
- Unfortunately it could be both! At the end of a dipole is very high voltage and if it hangs close to the vicinity of your shack, it could induce RFI. Same thing for feed line, every odd quarter wavel
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00454.html (13,164 bytes)
- 235. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6/425 Titan - Losing receive audio (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:42:59 -0500
- Jay, That does sound consistant with what used to happen with my Omni 6 and Titan 425, and it always turned out to be the vacuum relay. The failure would start out being stuck in the transmit positio
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00512.html (9,435 bytes)
- 236. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Work in Progress - Part 1 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:50:17 -0500
- John is to be congratulated for taking the time to write such a lengthy and detailed description of what works at John's QTH. As we all should know, what works at one QTH, does not necessiarly work a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00538.html (9,607 bytes)
- 237. Re: [TenTec] GFI Problems (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:05:09 -0500
- Heaven's!!! Maybe I'm doing SOMETHING right? I run 600 feet of 4" spaced open wire feedline out to my 80m dipole. The feeders come in through the eve's of the house, across about six feet in the atti
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00570.html (11,814 bytes)
- 238. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 sensitivity (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:17:44 -0500
- Boy, isn't that the truth!! In '92 I bought an Omni 6 and a Titan 425. During the 11 years of very hard use, they seldom ever had any failures. I was also into contesting, DX'ing, and 'fast' CW. Duri
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00691.html (12,967 bytes)
- 239. Re: [TenTec] Centurian vs Titan (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:27:27 -0500
- I just called Ten Tec yesterday, because my Titan 3 just blew up for the fourth time in two months, and this week, being Christmas, most of the TT folks are out and they only have a skeleton crew wor
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00773.html (9,140 bytes)
- 240. Re: [TenTec] Centurian vs Titan (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:38:51 -0500
- Thanks John...I hope TEN TEC can find the problem! So far replaced all six burned out cathode resistors, then a burned out transistor and a screen resistor, etc. They keep saying a 'momentary short i
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00786.html (11,111 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu