Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [TenTec] Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:38:59 -0400
I'm with you John! This morning about 2 am, I took my Orion off the desk and replaced it with my Omni 6....I don't think the Orion has much of a chance of getting it's spot back. Conditions and activ
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00659.html (8,002 bytes)

382. Re: [TenTec] Ringing in Filters at High Speed CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:13:08 -0400
Morning Al, Hmmmm...ringing? Don't think I've ever noticed that in my (previous) IC-781, Corsair 2, or Omni 6. Course, my hearing is probably not the best for high frequency audio range. Most of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00678.html (17,258 bytes)

383. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:32:14 -0400
It's all a personal choice....after all, we do call this a hobby! Exception is contest, wherein I doubt seriously you will hear anyone NOT using QSK. Tom - W4BQF PS....What is this VOX thing? Is this
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00679.html (9,752 bytes)

384. Re: [TenTec] Orion with Kam+ (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:06:49 -0400
Assuming your audio is being inputted to the rear AUX I/O connector, I would think your KAM has a problem. With my PC sound card, I set the sound level at barely minimum and the AUX input around 30,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00699.html (8,136 bytes)

385. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:59:49 -0400
YES!! Because they do just like he says. They can not tell they are transmitting (calling) while the DX is answering someone else, etc., etc., etc. Tom - W4BQF antenna, In of that had all
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00716.html (13,164 bytes)

386. [TenTec] DSP and such (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:31:26 -0400
I think most of us recognize W8JI for his practical and technical experience. In World Radio, here is what W8JI has to say: "Many of us think modern radios with advanced multiple DSP systems and LCD
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00739.html (7,995 bytes)

387. Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:02:34 -0400
I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work around that. What I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that employ digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at spee
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00753.html (9,915 bytes)

388. Re: [spam] [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:54:32 -0400
to And the lesson is???? Once I found a source of used mil-spec vacuum relays, the first one I put in is still in the 425, three years of every contest I could stick my nose into, plus almost daily
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00773.html (9,248 bytes)

389. Re: [spam] [TenTec] Orion - second week impressions and comparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:58:57 -0400
Now here is a ham for whom the Orion is a perfect match. To he** with Ten Tec's reputation of building the best CW radio available. What's a good reputation anyway? Tom - W4BQF since Sub head on 40m,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00774.html (11,322 bytes)

390. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:00:06 -0400
Yes! Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00775.html (7,799 bytes)

391. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:07:05 -0400
Since you are a very astute ham Bob, I will just assume you did that while listening to your Orion on a different receiver. The Orion's sidetone works OK at 70 wpm, but the two Orions I have certainl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00777.html (12,668 bytes)

392. Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:26:11 -0400
Opps...one step too far here Jim! Money has little to do with it, other than allowing one to purchase what is necessary to have a VERY competative station. What's the beef about RST? Who cares that a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00780.html (13,024 bytes)

393. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] [TenTec] Orion - second week impressions andcomparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:30:30 -0400
Shame on you...that was supposed to be a secret... :-))
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00781.html (14,581 bytes)

394. Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:32:59 -0400
What I should have said was "Did you copy, while working 150 QSO's per minute, the call correct......" Tom - W4BQF is Who the you. last
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00782.html (14,152 bytes)

395. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:43:34 -0400
It's an old thread Blair. Talking about it on this reflector did not get it changed, rehashing it will not either. Tom - W4BQF either
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00789.html (8,069 bytes)

396. Re: [spam] [spam] Re: [spam] [TenTec] Orion - second week impressionsandcomparisons (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:46:35 -0400
Oh gosh!! First we had the 'Ten Tec Worshipers Cult', now we have the 'QSK cult'....think it's time to see if 20 meters is open... Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00791.html (8,368 bytes)

397. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:43:20 -0400
Appropriately, I think it's mine!! Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00800.html (9,868 bytes)

398. Re: [TenTec] connector type? (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:22:37 -0400
The coax connnectors for the cables that connect boards are type TMP. And very hard to find. No brand name info. Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00807.html (8,005 bytes)

399. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:38:41 -0400
Bob.... I did not receive the wav files. Sure would appreciate it if you would send them again to aldermant@alltel.net Thanks. Tom - W4BQF .wav while correctly not wpm employ the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00808.html (15,056 bytes)

400. Re: TT [TenTec] Spare Tubes (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:50:13 -0400
Ken is correct. However, the 3CX has an Eimac suggested replacement, which is 3CXP800A7. These aparently are more rugged than the originals and are what is presently being used in most medical equipm
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00822.html (8,112 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu