Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] new emissins rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 08:32:21 -0400
That's kinda strange. I never really noticed key clicks much on 40m except on rare occasions. But I'm quickly finding a very different story on 20m...seems like about 80% of the CW signals on 20m are
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00208.html (8,014 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] Cooling the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:10:34 -0400
Now, there is a GOOD man. Can admit a mistake and move on! I think Rich should keep the $100 but throw us a big wine party instead. All in favor, get on CW! Tom - W4BQF 20 ___________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00246.html (10,948 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] Keyers 'N Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:25:47 -0400
I agree with that: "Real men use bugs and straight keys." BUT REAL hams use keyboards at >80wpm!! Tom - W4BQF learned except _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00260.html (12,061 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 17:35:45 -0400
Relay? I've never heard a clunk, peep, beep, or any noise of any kind when I'm running CW with my Orion!? Couldn't recall hearing a relay, so just went and checked again and no noise at all with the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00265.html (8,048 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:00:20 -0400
Well my hearing is not completely gone. With the Orion by itself, and with the audio turned all the way down, and with my ear within 6 inches of the front of the Orion, I can hear no relay clatter wh
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00278.html (9,049 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:08:18 -0400
OK...we have relays clicking and/or speakers clicking and/or phones clicking...! My Orion does not produce an audible click when I send code. Tom - W4BQF _____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00280.html (9,942 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:45:25 -0400
Yes, I agree. I have owned an Omni C, Omni D, six Corsair 2's, a great Omni 6, five IC-781's, and now the Orion, every one of which used the same type of relay. I understand what the relay is used fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00303.html (9,893 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:48:29 -0400
Unfortunately (or fortunately) that is not the type of operating I enjoy. I much prefer listening for mistakes when I'm sending and then listening to what my QSO partner is saying. IF my Orion had re
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00305.html (13,452 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Orion relay (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:49:34 -0400
The thread that was originally being discussed was about the QSK relay. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00307.html (9,752 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Orion try this (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:19:07 -0400
Well, I disagree. Let me say this politely....that is a USER problem because you should NOT be using the AF control while you are in the MENU. There is absolutely no reason to do that, that I know of
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00357.html (11,804 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Orion try this (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:37:11 -0400
Oh heck yes! In my case, if I slap my forehead and can't hear it for some reason, it still generates the acustic vibrations in the air from the physical shock to the empty container and 'something' h
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00360.html (14,694 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] Orion try this (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:07:54 -0400
Yep...I did change my mind and finally agree with you Grant. That's why we 'beta' testers can feed them info anyway. However I sure would like to be a beta tester or v1.37; would be nice to know how
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00368.html (9,886 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] New $10K Yaesu HF (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 11:12:46 -0400
I personally hope Ten Tec will stay on the design track they are already on. That is, make a damn fine radio and leave the color (useless) stuff to the $10k + manufacturers. I want to be able to HEAR
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00397.html (11,260 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] New $10K Yaesu HF (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 21:56:56 -0400
To me, it will be interesting to see what the 'big gun' contesters do in terms of updating their basic transceiver as these folks are primarily performance thinking people. Performance counts over 'b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00463.html (11,834 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] new product at Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:35:48 -0400
The big question is, did it have the new Ten Tec logo on it? You know, the one that says "Member - Ten Tec Worshipers Group". If it has that new logo, boy, I've gotta get one, and quick before they a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00495.html (10,901 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Re: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 17, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 13:07:07 -0400
Yea...but what I don't understand is why the dumb quarterback didn't throw the ball to the receiver over on the left....heck that guy was wide open...gosh, I could have done a better job myself..!!!
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00502.html (24,959 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] 1.370 (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:26:56 -0400
Hmmm....Josh, mine said 9804 lines sent to the Orion in 289 seconds??? Wonder what the difference may be! Tom - W4BQF All is well in Alabama. 9408 lines and 9397 sent to Orion in 305 sec. 73 Josh N4V
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00578.html (7,421 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] New Orion Firmware Version! (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:29:27 -0400
Although I haven't measured it, it does not seem like the 8ms delay at key up was fixed either? Was sure looking forward to this. Most other fixes seem to be working well however. Tom - W4BQF a is th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00579.html (10,717 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] New Orion Firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:33:55 -0400
Wild shot...sounds like you just have something else assigned to the same COM port as you have the Orion assigned? Maybe reboot the PC, delete the previous firmware update from your PC, and then open
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00580.html (9,588 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ computer control? (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 06:58:38 -0400
Yes, YPlog by VE6YP does a great job with the Omni 6. You can set up a table of frequencies you want, then click the freq and it moves the Omni 6 to that frequency. You can control VFO A and/or VFO B
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00590.html (8,161 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu