Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bcarling@cfl.rr.com: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Re(Ten Tec) In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:40:55 -0500
My 422 Centurion manual has very adequate instructions for tuning, and that is what I go by. Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00023.html (9,524 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 08:35:21 -0500
Ig not exceeding max specs. And yes of course Rick - that is precisely why we dip Ip first before everything else, and always watch for not exceeding maximum plate current rating as well as maximum I
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00036.html (14,707 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:52:01 -0500
Some rigs yes. Some rigs no. It doesn't necessarily follow that something is wrong with the equipment. If you want an example, try looking at a Drake manual. Best regards - Bry Carling ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00040.html (17,592 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:13:37 -0500
Rick - make sure you use an ink that can be removed. The next owner may not want that, and you may get less for the amplifier when reselling it. _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00052.html (8,790 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:05:20 -0500
So YOU'RE THAT GUY! (grin!) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00055.html (11,940 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:48:02 -0400
Interesting developments. I have a newly rewound HV power transformer installed in my Tentec 422. It appears to be working. No more blowing primary fuses and I now see the 3000V or so that I expect o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00136.html (10,223 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:59:51 -0400
Thanks Don - I will call them tomorrow and buy the kit. Or find those 5 parts on the web. This QSK board was already replaced once by the previous owner. It seems to be the other one of two very weak
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00141.html (14,040 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:13:27 -0400
By the way - I have heard of 7 or 8 of these Centurion HV transformers blowing in recent years and then being rewound. I can imagine that there have been quite a few of the transformers replaced by T
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00142.html (13,766 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:36:26 -0400
Yes and the good news is my Centurion is up and running after I replaced the two chips on the QSK board today. However the fan still won't run so I need to fix that before using it any more. I always
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00148.html (10,238 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp QSK Board (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:48:15 -0400
Thanks Bob - my 422 cebnturion is all fixed and working 100% now. First I installed the newly rewound plate transformer from Gary Brown of TRS. Thanks so much Gary, for the wonderful top-quality rewi
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00156.html (13,504 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:50:03 -0400
Kim I can think of many reasons. The used amp I bought with relays was a lot cheaper to acquire than a new amp with pin diodes. Even with reopairing it I saved money. Does Ten Tec use PIN diodes in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00157.html (8,182 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:55:52 -0400
Ver yinteresting gary... I have to wonder why some guys will spend $500 for an external accessory to do QSK with their linear amplifier. The system in my TT 422 is so simple. A couple of simple board
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00177.html (13,131 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:03:24 -0400
Yes, but I think a lot of radio amateurs using good QSK Rigs like the Tentec have managed to convert their amplifiers for QSK operation by adding a circuitboard like the QSK 1500 or the QSK5. I reali
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00179.html (11,610 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:29:12 -0400
Thank you Rick. I enjoy QSK whatever the background noise is not too high. I frequently have a noise level of about S7 on 80 m and 40m here in Florida. That does not make for a great situation unless
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00181.html (14,686 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:12:04 -0400
Rick - I would say that the 813 is also a great valve. You used to be able to buy them for $20.- 30 each not too long ago, but because they are out of production ver few manufacturers still want to u
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00189.html (23,153 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:07:29 -0400
Do any of these TT noise blankers do anything for you guys. Mine appears to do very little in my Omni VI Plus... Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00247.html (8,863 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:10:45 -0400
Strange - mine in the OMNI VI+ does NOTHING to either of these types of noises no matter how you adjust the radio. I'll have whatever Bill is having... _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00284.html (11,134 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] ET: cq erthling 10tekgrup (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:16:47 -0400
Ja ja - shure it vassn;t! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00019.html (9,587 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] ET: cq erthling 10tekgrup (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:18:01 -0400
Poor propagation day = time on his hands, LOL! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00020.html (9,345 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:22:49 -0400
How do you like the Elecraft after the Omni six plus? Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00039.html (11,650 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu