Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bob@5b4agn.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-6+ cw offset adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 11:18:55 -0500
It's a long time since I used my VI+ so my recollection may not be perfect but fwiw..... CW offset is indeed adjustable from the front panel and I believe sidetone pitch tracks CW offset. What is not
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00010.html (9,350 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-6+ cw offset adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 04:35:40 -0500
Arthur Just a couple more bits of info which might be helpful..... The Ten Tec optional 9MHz CW filters are centred on 750Hz not 800Hz as I previously stated. According to the website, which I have j
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00023.html (12,562 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:18:00 -0500
Impementation of band-stacking ID is a big plus. Many thanks Ten Tec The benefit of adding the SPLIT designator is completely lost on me. Split already being indicated by both VFO A/B switch lights a
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00445.html (8,772 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:47:47 -0500
Carl Battery reset, master reset and power off/on carried out but sidetone is poor. Interesting that yours is ok. I really don't know what to make of that. Bob I don't understand the sidetone comment
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00447.html (11,369 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:17:12 -0500
A useful observation Don. I always use headphones. Just checked and mine is fine on speaker too. With headphones, I could live with the harmonic content but the tail end click is really Nasty. Bob, 5
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00453.html (15,800 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:30:38 -0500
Thanks Carl. Also interesting. I have just loaded 2.059d and find the sidetone to be substantially click free, whereas with 2.060b I hear a pronounced back-end click. Click volume is unaffected by si
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00456.html (17,783 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:29:13 -0500
Carl I have nothing connected to any form of audio accessory socket, other than headphones. I am an habitual QSK operator and have been for almost 40 years. Any extraneous T/R noise heard in the head
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00464.html (23,435 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:35:41 -0500
With 1.373b5 I found the clickiness of the sidetone directly related to CW rise/fall setting. With 2.060b I find it independent of this. Bob, 5B4AGN -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@so
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00467.html (24,383 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:54:20 -0500
I'm not hearing any click in my Orion with V 2.060b but I am certainly hearing the "smuck" you describe at the end of a character element when using my headphones. Joe You may be right. Perhaps it i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00469.html (10,350 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:00:55 -0500
I assumed so Don but I can't say I'm certain. I guess Carl can tell us. Bob, 5B4AGN Bob, Was Carl listening with headphones on cw? From what I am hearing it is horrible sounding with headphones on. H
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00470.html (25,083 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Fw: V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:42:18 -0500
As alluded to by Jerry K0CQ, I suspect the material factor distinguishing those who are troubled by the end of element click or smuck and those who are not, is likely to be headphone sensitivity. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00475.html (25,631 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:47:33 -0500
The key is do you have to run the volume higher for headphones than speaker or lower or the same? My volume works fine with the same volume setting for both headphones and speaker. I agree the smuck
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00476.html (10,546 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:55:44 -0500
Re: Orion sidetone problem. I will send a report to Ten Tec detailing this problem. It would make sense if all who are troubled by it do the same. The harmonic content in my sidetone has diminished s
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00492.html (13,977 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Headphone Click in v2.060 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:56:16 -0500
George See my last mail. I connected my headphones to Orion's external speaker socket this morning and the sidetone was perfect. No clicks. It is almost certain the problem has arisen due to a change
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00499.html (9,030 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec and Tokio High power amp interfacing (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 05:40:18 -0500
Hi Fred A very versatile unit but at $159 it would be an expensive solution for someone just wanting to interface an Orion to a Yaesu amp. For a few cents, a 74LS147 or similar 10 to 4 line encoder w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00060.html (9,218 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] O II in hostile environment? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:37:26 -0500
Hola Tom BPF and stubs are all you'll need, unless you have two stations operating on the same band. I have run two Orions with high power SO2R to a single F12 C31XR for several years without problem
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00248.html (8,882 bytes)

17. [TenTec] Immaculate Omni VI+ for sale in Europe. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:47:43 -0500
I have way too many radios! Consequently, I am planning to dispose of some of them. Among these is my immaculate Omni VI+ (Not an Omni VI option 3). This is available for sale together with 962 psu a
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00754.html (7,623 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Received cw sigs (2.059) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 07:49:40 -0500
I've noticed the effect too Barry, also on SSB. To my ears, it sounds like the DSP is just starting to overload. I remain at 1.373b5. 73 Bob, 5B4AGN Has anybody else noticed slight distortion (clippi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00117.html (8,634 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion2 Problem with indication of the analog meter (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:13:12 -0500
Bill I'm not sure this explanation holds water. The 8 bit D to A will reduce that 1/10th dB resolution from the precision arithmetic to 114/256 dB or just better than 1/2 dB. Unless the S-meter movem
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00366.html (8,996 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@5b4agn.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:26:09 -0500
Presentation is a powerful thing. It can triumph over substance. Doug Smith wrote great DSP code for Orion. I don't recall anyone complaining about the DSP code Doug left behind. Despite this, it was
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00009.html (12,789 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu