Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bob@cytanet.com.cy: 189 ]

Total 189 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] ORION Hi/Lo Cut control (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 05:24:43 +0000
Thank you guys for your responses on this one. You have helped shed a great deal of light upon the matter. Some of you apparently see the same effects I have described whilst others have Hi/Lo cut co
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00516.html (9,359 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] ALC Indicator (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:51:33 +0000
I have two 963s and whilst electrically they seem to work just fine running my Orions, I do find them acoustically rather noisy. Like Rick, I notice the cooling fans switch on frequently, even in rec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00525.html (10,875 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] Orion Wish List (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:05:01 +0000
Taylor I support your proposals which are well thought out and well presented. I am sure the good folks at TT will take note of your comments. For my own part I would add a further item to your list:
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00630.html (11,942 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Which firmware for the Orion? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:40:56 +0000
Lee I am in no doubt that you should use the latest firmware. This is version 1.371 currently. I am running 1.371 on two Orions and so far I find both to be stable and operate well. If in using the l
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00697.html (9,251 bytes)

85. [TenTec] Orion Reliability was IC-7800 Review (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:01:27 -0000
Tommy I am always more than a little curious when I read your reports. You appear to be very dissatisfied with the reliability of your Orion. Whilst I am aware of a few things which could still benef
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00839.html (9,023 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] Orion Reliability was IC-7800 Review (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:40:37 -0000
Kirk Your comments have successfully overshadowed my curiosity with a feeling of far greater confusion. Did someone say that Tom's comments were unreasonable? If they did then I missed it. My note, w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00846.html (10,835 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Orion Reliability (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:19:45 -0000
Billy I would be amazed if you find anyone to disagree with you. If I, as an Orion owner, had Tom's experience I would be tearing my hair out. I imagine those other Orion owners who still have hair w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00857.html (9,568 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] SO2R with only one TenTec ORION? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 04:42:51 -0000
Now that's an interesting question. The Orion has two receivers and produces two sets of band data for independent selection of antennas. However, for SO2R you would need to be able to listen on one
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00684.html (7,773 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:12:49 -0000
I deduce from your mail that you're not overly impressed by Idiom Press and their K3 keyer! I don't own a K3 and have no relationship with Idiom Press. I do use a Samson ETM9 which is a Logikey circu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00840.html (31,593 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:38:16 -0000
Steve Both keying compensation and keying weight are constants. Compensation is a constant time period added to every character element, whereas Weight is a constant ratio. The time compensating effe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00854.html (41,230 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Chasing RTTY DX with the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 05:58:05 -0000
Duane I think you have answered the question for yourself. Mixing primary and sub RX audio to one TU is messy and produces just that on a screen. With only one TU I would suggest you toggle between l
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00148.html (8,522 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 02:29:14 -0000
I'm with you Duane. In a pile up QSK is invaluable. I use QSK 100% of the time when I'm not contesting. I used to use it during contests too but use of SO2R provides greater return and is incompatibl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00206.html (9,839 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:15:42 -0000
Well I'm really no expert and I think Ten Tec's basis for the decision to deploy roofing filters when DSP b/w is at 75% of roofing b/w would be better explained by them. Having said that, I offer the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00224.html (10,379 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 07:35:29 -0000
Well...........the one thing that everyone appears to be overlooking here is PBT. If the 2400 Hz roofing filter were to switch in at 2400 Hz DSP then the PBT control would not function. Instead of ad
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00260.html (31,818 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 07:44:10 -0000
Bill I think this is the first time I have seen something you have written that I disagree with! Single coversion superhets are inompatible with the roofing filter concept. The filters in the K2 are
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00261.html (9,192 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:32:37 -0000
Sinisa You are correct, I am mistaken. Which, I guess, brings us back to the original question about whether switching roofing filters at DSP b/w = 75% roofing b/w is optimum or unecessarily conserva
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00264.html (11,494 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] Superhet Receiver Types? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:49:20 -0000
All of that is pretty much dead on Ken until the last bit. If a receiver has an IF (Intermediate Frequency) at all, it is not direct conversion. Direct conversion converts in one step from rf to audi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00265.html (11,052 bytes)

98. [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:04:54 -0000
Whether a filter is a roofing filter or not isn't really anything to do with where in the receive chain the filter is located or what it's performance specifications are. It is to do with the role it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00267.html (8,280 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:19:31 -0000
Thanks for the explanation. That seems to pretty much answer everyone's questions concerning roofing filter cut in. Bob, 5B4AGN 75% _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00269.html (11,142 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Orion/DXBase Control Help (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:52:08 -0000
Hi Chuck I don't know anything about DXBase but Orion is fixed at 57600 baud. 73 Bob, 5B4AGN to rate is _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00312.html (7,840 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu