Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bob.cunnings@gmail.com: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Picky, picky, picky... (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:27:29 -0700
Were you using UCW or LCW? Using 2.055 I have noticed (and reported to ditsnbits) that if you zero beat a signal it will indeed appear at the zero hashmark when using LCW mode, but not UCW. It's easy
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00475.html (8,996 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] A Look at NR (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:44:56 -0700
Well, where it may count the most, the DSP processors have not changed - Orion II uses the SHARC 21065, same as Orion?? (no schematic available for download to check) Bob NW8L _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01099.html (8,156 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Orion 565 v2.056 display text (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:43:10 -0700
I recently noticed that on my v2.056 rig the alignment of text has shifted... some of the name/value pairs under the MAIN and SUB headings are no longer left justified with the heading the way they o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01149.html (7,239 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AT tuner question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:32:58 -0700
I believe it does, I rely on that behavior when when using an antenna that is resonant on 80 m but sometimes pressed into service on 160. When operating on Top Band I use the internal tuner, but if I
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00012.html (15,602 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion v2.056 PSK question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:12:14 -0600
Yes, I was looking at that little table of settings the other day myself and thought: "can't be right, it's a typo" when I saw the psk31 entry. I set the TX EQ to 0dB and power to 100, then adjust th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00303.html (9,146 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion got noisy (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:25:30 -0600
Perhaps the EQ filter coefficients got corrupted - so changing the EQ setting, since it causes them to be overwritten with new values, returned the filter to a sane state? RC ________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00443.html (8,172 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] What version? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:17:14 -0600
I'm using 2.056, runtime stability was paramount for me. With 1.372 my rig locked up from time to time, but 2.056 is rock solid. Since I'm a CW op the 2.056 issues often discussed here don't impact m
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00606.html (9,660 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] What version? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:44:23 -0600
Right. The Orion is a dream rig for CW. At first I also thought it was too much, but as you mention, the terrific receiver lets me "hang in" there with very weak signals (esp. QRP stns) in the face o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00609.html (10,451 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio Deluxe (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:35:52 -0600
When using the subreceiver in AM mode, headphone audio from the main receiver is lost when the transmitter is keyed... a known problem with 2.056, one that bugs me since I like to park the subreceive
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00029.html (8,721 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Sidetone Level with 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:06:47 -0600
Yes. I'm a CW op, and if I set the sidetone level so that the "spot" tone has the level I like, then the sidetone when keying is much too low, down 10 dB or so from the "spot" level. This is a change
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00179.html (8,575 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Sidetone Level with 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:42:37 -0600
No, the *relative* difference between "spot" tone level and keying sidetone is what I've noticed has changed. For a given of sidetone level setting, the "spot" tone is much louder than the keying sid
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00195.html (8,883 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Sidetone Level with 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:57:19 -0600
Yikes! Your message made me notice I was tangled up in the wrong thread - I'm using 2.059d for Orion also, not O2. BTW my earlier statement that the (keying) sidetone was independent of audio gain se
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00197.html (8,911 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Orion 2.059d - TUNE bug? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 16:21:30 -0600
Hello, Wonder if anyone else sees this in Orion 2.059d: After pressing the TUNE button to tune up in CW mode, my main receiver MODE is changed to whatever mode the subreceiver happens to be set to...
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00199.html (7,905 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.059d - TUNE bug? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 16:50:29 -0600
I've since discovered that this only happens when VFO B is assigned to the main receiver, which is how I've always operated - given how the gear is arranged, it's easier for me to use that (rightmost
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00201.html (8,226 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.059d - TUNE bug? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:16:24 -0600
Bill, Have you been able to confirm the problem I've encountered? To reproduce: 1. Assign VFO B to main rx, any VFO to tx and subrx. 2. Place main rx in some mode, say LCW. 3. Place sub rx in another
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00233.html (8,621 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.059d - TUNE bug? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:04:23 -0600
Ok, thank you, a report has gone off to ditnbits. BTW I also think the NR has changed for the better - it's more useful on cw - as long as rf gain is properly set to start with. Also the sweep is pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00235.html (8,462 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] More audio woes with 2.059d (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:12:29 -0600
It's only the headphone audio that is lost, not the speaker audio. This is a bug reported on the previous version 2.056, still present on 2.056d. Bob NW8L ____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00304.html (8,806 bytes)

18. [TenTec] Orion v2.059d - cw rise time measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:58:59 -0600
I wanted to see if v2.059d improved the accuracy of the cw rise/fall time setting, so I took a scope home this weekend and looked: Rise time results in ms, average of 5 measurements: Indicated Measur
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00425.html (8,166 bytes)

19. [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:40:54 -0600
Hello, I've not used the bandstacking registers much in Orion, but lately have started to - in order to hop between CW freqs and SSB freqs on 80 - the point is to monitor a net on 75 m from time to t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00627.html (7,780 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:47:25 -0600
Right, and I've gotten that far... as I wrote in the earlier email. I always have VFO B selected, since I assign VFO B to the main receiver. The problem isn't the frequency. It is that when bandstack
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00633.html (8,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu