Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:brent.zook@verizon.net: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 08:28:02 -0500
I too just received my Orion, 5 weeks to the day from my order. --Brent N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00086.html (6,693 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Orion and TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:54:32 -0500
TR-Log doesn't seem to be seeing my radio. Any suggestions? --N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00089.html (6,604 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Orion and TRLog (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:10:45 -0500
Thanks to all who responded. My software was new, but my manual was old. And the Orion had a hardward glitch so is going back to the factory for TLC. When it comes back -- just get ready to get your
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00118.html (7,388 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (FCC) (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:50:42 -0500
Similarly for the examiner in Chicago. He was a black fellow, I don't know his name. When I took my advanced there was no one else taking the test. He then talked me into trying the extra -- and when
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00298.html (7,370 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] QUESTION :ORION SEND 1,2,3 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:55:39 -0500
I have limited experience with the "send" memories in phone. However, on cw, all of the memories stay put when the rig is turned off. They seem to be character limited instead of time limited, and ea
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00280.html (7,371 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:18:53 -0500
I learned from experience that my soundblaster card would put out second harmonics. With a wide transmit passband, and a 1000 hz note, you might also be transmitting a 2000 hz note. Therefore, I try
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00104.html (7,390 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion problems in contest (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:07 -0500
Just like those who operate the PBT at 100 hz for phone operation, I find that setting to be preferable for cw operation. There is some of the opposite sideband of a strong cw signal which can bleed
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00351.html (7,458 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] More Orion II Pics (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:18:45 -0500
I echo Joe W2KJ's sentiment. No reason for upgrade there. --Brent N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00084.html (6,988 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] O2 keyer (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:57:40 -0500
I have to agree with Gary Tuck. I use an original Orion, and had trouble with the keyer when I first started using it. Nothing wrong with the keyer, it just feels different than the one on the Kenwoo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00424.html (8,138 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:09:01 -0500
Installed the software, did the hardware (took me more like 1.7 hours), very nice. I'll keep using it. I'm concerned because the noise limiter doesn't change the s-meter display. Is this an audio lim
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00723.html (8,532 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:00:54 -0500
Was playing with the new beta release last night and noticed that, on cw and wearing headphones, after pressing the cw key the receiver does not come back on. I get no further receive audio. I can st
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00789.html (7,427 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] No headphones with my Orion I and 2.055 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:12:04 -0500
This bug has been reported before by myself and others. Chances are your second receiver is set to AM mode. If that is the case, any time you hit transmit or hit the key, the headphones will stop wor
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00189.html (7,622 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:41:34 -0500
The new 2.0 firmware implementation in the Orion just hasn't done it for me. I would like to see comments on the following issues (to see if I am correct or just plain wrong), because I don't want to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00191.html (9,013 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Other 1.373b5 Orion 1 problem (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:21:32 -0500
I notice the "auto" roofing filter setting acts erratically under this beta. Widen or tighten the passband and the roofing filters seem to kick in or out at different times. --Brent N9HZ ____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00468.html (7,760 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Effect of roofing filter selection on Orion II NB (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:44:02 -0500
IMHO, the 1.371 version for the original Orion was no better than version 1.372 when it came to the NR. I even found NR in 1.371 to mask very weak signals. 1.372 worked better than any before or sinc
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00696.html (8,588 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] V 1.373b (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:32:23 -0400
Original orion -- I am still using 1.372 rather than either of the 1.373b releases because-- With either beta release, the "auto" feature selecting the proper roofing filter does not reliably change
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00439.html (7,424 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Happy Orion owners (was question about updates) (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 11:30:53 -0400
I am also a happy O1 owner. At first, I was put off by the slow band scan. But in contest use, nothing comes close. I love my Kenwood TS-870 and went back to that for one contest -- heard noise I had
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00022.html (7,784 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Happy Orion owners (was question about updates) (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:29:31 -0400
It is nice to see the happy Orion owners (1 & 2) chiming in. Your posts bring us back to reality - namely, that the Orion or Orion II is the best thing going for contesting. Many of you started out w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00068.html (10,290 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Mobile CW (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:19:29 -0400
I absolutely agree that mobile cw (if you can copy cw in your head) is much easier than mobile phone. You don't have to think as quickly. I just put the paddle on the shotgun seat, no leg strap. If t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00676.html (7,322 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Non-digital Ten-Tec transceivers (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:17:43 -0400
Speaking of the Omnis -- I have an Omni D, first (original) series, upgraded to a series B. The first series had a wonderful audio filter, great for cw. So in the upgraded Omni D, you can still hook
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00195.html (8,781 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu