Mail Archive Search: <+from:btippett@alum.mit.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 662 ]

Total 662 documents matching your query.

201. [TenTec] Banana boat swing (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:33:40 -0500; Exactly George. That is what communications is all about...not sending some jibberish that only the sender understands. I think that is why the FCC used to make sending a part of their exams. 100 wat; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00423.html (8,681 bytes)
202. [TenTec] Beverage Kits (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 09:24:27 -0400; I have a few Beverage kits left over from my "How to hear the weak ones" talk at SEDCO last week (Ten-Tec Hamfest). With the low-band DX and N2XE Beacon season fast approaching, now's the time to imp; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00191.html (7,605 bytes)
203. [TenTec] Orion II Filters (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:47:27 -0400; K5SF: Are you sure about that? I thought Ten-Tec decided to use 9.001500 as the common IF for all filters, unlike Orion which uses 9.001500 for 1000 and up slots and 9.000750 for the 500 and 250. I c; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00424.html (8,066 bytes)
204. [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:03:10 -0400; operator to do a much better job of copying the weak signal than a receiver with poor 3OIMD response. Especially so if an IMD birdie happens to zero beat the signal you are trying to copy. The human; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00031.html (7,460 bytes)
205. [TenTec] OT - Age Related Macular Degeneration (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:16:23 -0400; Roy, my father-in-law (90) and mother (98) both were having problems with this. N4SU's XYL (86 who I've been helping sell Dave's gear) told me about a product which has worked well for her in arrest; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00041.html (7,716 bytes)
206. [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:44:56 -0400; your listening frequency, then you are correct, assuming the IMD product is an unmodulated carrier. However, I think zero beat in this context means "on the same frequency as the signal you are attem; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00051.html (8,173 bytes)
207. [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 10:04:11 -0400; 5B4AGN: Correct, but isn't it actually nonsense <grin>. then that will be on 14025 too. If the wanted signal is CW and the IP is a carrier, then whatever audible tone you choose to listen to the CW a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00054.html (9,199 bytes)
208. [TenTec] FS: N4SU's Astron RS-35M (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:51:14 -0400; For anyone looking for a good power supply for an Omni or Orion, I am selling N4SU's RS-35M with proceeds to Dave's XYL. Asking $95 plus shipping (27 pounds from 28001). Picture and more details belo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00058.html (7,051 bytes)
209. [TenTec] N4SU's Astron RS-35M Sold <eom> (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 21:05:04 -0400; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00060.html (6,758 bytes)
210. [TenTec] Orion Receiver Hints in High Static Conditions (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:14:54 -0400; configured for a high noise environment. You may want AGC on FAST if there is a tremendous difference in surviving signal strength. Len there is no way to truly turn Orion's AGC off. If you set AGC "; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00297.html (8,150 bytes)
211. [TenTec] Ten Tec serial numbers, updates, warranty (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:10:02 -0400; K9RT: Rather than simply looking at serial numbers, you might want to also consider documentation of hardware updates. A 2 year old unit that has been updated recently might actually be better than a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00358.html (8,428 bytes)
212. [TenTec] Orion v2.0 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:22:55 -0400; "The message is that there are known knowns - there are things that we know that we know. There are known unknowns - that is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are als; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00509.html (8,431 bytes)
213. [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:20:18 -0400; Orion has some new competition! See the ARRL Product Review in October QST. http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0510.pdf IMDDR3 at 2 kHz is 99 db versus Orion's ~92 dB at the same spacing; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00541.html (8,483 bytes)
214. [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:21:13 -0400; AC5AA : NQ5T: when the subject came up there were a lot of averted glances, mumbling and equivocating), at least as of Dallas Ham-Com in June. The October QST review is fairly positive on non-QSK CW; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00568.html (7,921 bytes)
215. [TenTec] Attachments (was Re: ORION roofing filter (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:51:32 -0400; e-mail DIGEST (such as I do) or via the web archive do not have access to attachments on messages. It is not our home system's fault, nor overzealous security settings at our end. In fact, NOBODY ca; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00127.html (7,749 bytes)
216. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 06:42:38 -0400; NQ5T: and it will take someone who isn't dependent on advertising revenue to test/publish those Grant, this seems to be a common misconception since someone on the Yahoo FT-9000 reflector made almost; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00149.html (8,998 bytes)
217. [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 08:05:18 -0400; particularly impressive given the fairly high MDS compared to most other radios without the preamp on. Sort of a "desense the radio and all the other specs will look better" approach. This is a very; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00151.html (7,881 bytes)
218. [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:01:47 -0400; From ARRL's recent review: "The differences are in the details. The ?9000D has three choices for roofing filter bandwidth at 3, 6 and 15 kHz, while the ?7800 has two?6 and 15 kHz. The 3 kHz roofing f; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00152.html (8,734 bytes)
219. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: "Tracy, Michael, KC1SX" <mtracy@arrl.org>(by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 10:17:34 -0400; (I forwarded Michels' response since he is not a member of this list...de W4ZV) Hi Bill, I have to disagree, as this would mislead folks even more. There never has been a *single* number that defines; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00154.html (8,917 bytes)
220. [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:49:13 -0400; numbers if our ears are only 70% as good when we were young? Speak for yourself...mine are still excellent at age 60. I've taken care of them by using earplugs riding motorcycles, shooting or using l; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00158.html (7,809 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]