Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 662 ]

Total 662 documents matching your query.

321. [TenTec] Frequency accuracy... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:27:58 -0500
KB2M: via the keypad and I get a 'frequency not supported error' I haven't tried to tune WWV on 10 mc in quite awhile, I'm pretty sure I used to be able to go there. Any ideas? You are probably using
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01254.html (8,179 bytes)

322. [TenTec] Ten Tec rig I'd like to have. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:40:26 -0500
sub Rx. Amen, amen, amen...did I say AMEN? A single RX with Orion's front end would be a killer contest/DX rig in the $2k range. Sayonara 756 and MP. Perhaps an old Omni VI with Inrad's new 600 Hz ro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01328.html (9,001 bytes)

323. [TenTec] CQ WW SSB - 10 meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:07:31 -0500
Hi All, 65 second .wav recording by HA5PP near peak opening: http://users.vnet.net/btippett/topband_sounds.htm (507 kB) Full results: http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/3830/2004-November/096157.html
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00015.html (7,226 bytes)

324. [TenTec] Re: [Orion] CQ WW SSB - 10 meters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:28:10 -0500
SEND 1, 2 AND 3. I had slightly different CQ messages recorded in each (of course #3 is lost when Orion is powered down). I cannot comment on your problems with NR since I only used the hardware NB w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00056.html (7,912 bytes)

325. [TenTec] RE: [Orion] ORION PERFORMANCE (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 18:17:05 -0500
Eric you accidentally posted this to Ten-Tec instead of Orion, so I'm copying your post below for benefit of the Orion reflector. Your settings are quite similar to mine for SSB contesting, so I'll j
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00093.html (11,791 bytes)

326. [TenTec] [Orion] Orion SSB settings (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 06:48:09 -0500
settings. It's not as easy to get to as the bandwidth knob on the radio. RX EQ is something I typically set and forget for SSB. Play with it and find the setting your ears like best. -15 dB seems to
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00113.html (8,265 bytes)

327. [TenTec] Orion and digital modes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:44:02 -0500
I was getting line noise hum on the AUX I/O audio output of Orion into the Soundblaster card in my computer. I bought the following isolation transformer from Radio Shack for $3.99 and it completely
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00472.html (7,940 bytes)

328. [TenTec] Topband: Receivers - More Data (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:46:47 -0500
** signals. In the most recent CQ WW SSB, I had the highest number of 10m DX QSO's of any USA station. All major multiop stations have much larger antenna systems, multiple operators, dual positions,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00704.html (8,541 bytes)

329. [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the TT Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:14:40 -0400
they rely on proven rather than latest-fad technology; Jan, speaking as the owner of two BMW vehicles (1995 R1100RS bike and 1993 M5 auto), I agree with much of what you said. However, I believe BMW
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00009.html (9,816 bytes)

330. [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the BMW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:12:25 -0400
idrive system. Most of the interior controls are intregated <sic> into one big knob on the console. Some of this review reminds me of certain ham rigs. Here is a clip from the Edmunds review and the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00024.html (12,028 bytes)

331. [TenTec] Jones Filter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:27:45 -0400
Technology Officer. Lee is a former Collins RF design engineer and has had a significant impact on every piece of equipment we've built over the past 20 years. His latest ham radio-related contributi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00122.html (8,700 bytes)

332. [TenTec] New Paper on Receiver Measurements by Sherwood Engineering (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:29:45 -0400
http://www.sherweng.com/images/MeasurementAccuracy&SampleVariation.pdf 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00297.html (7,562 bytes)

333. [TenTec] wanted: TT filters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:40:27 -0400
Josh, for you and any others outfitting a new Orion, here is what I have in mine after having tried the Ten-Tec 217 (500 Hz), 218 (1800 Hz), 219 (250 Hz), Inrad 759 (400 Hz) and Inrad 762 (aka #352 k
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00329.html (9,021 bytes)

334. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 07:27:29 -0400
K9YC: contest rig in the world. Check out the K2's close-in IMD performance at <5 kHz spacings: http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/lab/k2.pdf (page 21) http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00108.html (10,328 bytes)

335. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 08:03:46 -0400
W5IZ: Well it was my home brew 352 that Sherwood tested...so that's one better than a 762. ;-) Yes, I meant the 762. 73, Bill W4ZV
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00110.html (8,308 bytes)

336. [TenTec] Sweep display freezing on Orion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:57:16 -0400
BDR and I couldn't find enough QRM to even verify that measurement. I had lockups, hang-ups, dropouts, poor performance in QRN and even total front end overload from BC stations. That's very interest
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00127.html (9,812 bytes)

337. Re: [TenTec] Sweep display freezing on Orion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:33:07 -0400
receiver. If the receiver is the least bit susceptible to front end overload, it will show up. For example, my Triton IV on 80 meters is totally overloaded by several local BC stations. I had to inst
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00135.html (14,110 bytes)

338. [TenTec] Sweep display freezing on Orion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:37:52 -0400
one here on 840khz, WHAS, 50kw about 10 to 15 miles away. You wouldn't believe how strong they are here. I have a small field strength meter which is nothing more than a diode across a microamp meter
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00138.html (9,495 bytes)

339. RE: TT Re: TT [TenTec] Orion is going back to dealer... sorry ! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:46:15 -0400
No problems...... I had to pay to upgrade (errrr, fix bugs) my Icom 775DSP (and my 735 and 765) sitting next to the Orion. And then there's Microsoft's perfect XP creation...over 95MB worth of update
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00167.html (7,526 bytes)

340. Re: [TenTec] Orion reflector discussions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:47:45 -0400
Hi Rick, OK...I'll bite on a few of your comments. software side. The hardware issues, in particular, the display darkening due to a heat issue, still concern me. I notice, however, that there has no
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00189.html (12,272 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu