Mail Archive Search: <+from:btippett@alum.mit.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 662 ]

Total 662 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] [Fwd: "Being a Contrarian . . ."] (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 06:41:57 -0400; Rob NC0B: Certainly 85 dB is adequate on CW virtually all the time. W8JI and I completely agree on this. I am still mystified by RSGB's measurement of the Sub-RX in Orion II. It shows 85 dB IMDDR3 at; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00003.html (7,822 bytes)
62. [TenTec] On being a satisified customer (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 07:19:38 -0400; W4BQF: sitting here trying to recall if there is ANYTHING to gripe about with these radios!! The only thing that kept me from an Omni is that 400 Hz is the lowest CW Pitch frequency. That stopped me; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00214.html (7,474 bytes)
63. [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 11:19:01 -0400; N9DG: tell is very close to the Pegasus/Jupiter with 45 MHz 1st IF and ~455 kHz second IF. Putting the improved filtering in those two spots will improve two areas of weakness in the RX320/350, Pegas; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00221.html (9,366 bytes)
64. [TenTec] Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 13:41:46 -0400; NN8B: Peter Hart G3SJX has been doing Product Reviews for RSGB's RadCom Magazine for many years. He gave a talk at the 2005 RSGB HF Convention titled "How well do our radios perform?" Results from hi; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00228.html (7,549 bytes)
65. [TenTec] Band-Stacking (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:19:48 -0400; N9VV re Omni VII: "the band stacking memories are visible on the screen as A,B,C,D. Very clear and convenient visual feedback. Very quick response." Having asked for this in Orion for 3 years... the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00288.html (6,969 bytes)
66. [TenTec] Orion II - Tech Topics (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:56:23 -0400; Ten-Tec has added a "Tech Topics" link on their Orion II page with the following objective: Orion II Tech Topics (link is to left or main O2 page) "In-depth coverage of technical issues and questions; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00314.html (8,616 bytes)
67. [TenTec] Why I love Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:55:47 -0400; functions have been moved outside the AGC loop in O2 from inside the loop in Orion/V1. Just hours later I received a response from K4JU Jack Burchfield, CEO of Ten-Tec: "I understand your problem wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00339.html (7,830 bytes)
68. [TenTec] "End of an Era" (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:27:17 -0400; N0OKS: I'm sure you are kidding. Real radios use knobs, not mouses. When you see anyone in Top Ten contest results that uses an SDR, please let us know. 73, Bill W4ZV; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00544.html (8,123 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] Top 10 with mouse only controls - WAS: "End of an Era" (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 07:25:04 -0400; N9DG: Low Power category for the various ARRL VHF contests. I figured someone would mention VHF, but try the serious HF contests, such as those necessary to qualify for the recent World Radio Team Ch; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00555.html (8,627 bytes)
70. [TenTec] Top 10 with mouse only controls - WAS: "End of an Era" (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:16:33 -0400; W4ZV: N9DG: buttons. Note that there aren't any properly done UI's yet. So instead of sitting on the sidelines grousing that SDR and software controls can't be made better than traditional knobs and; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00566.html (8,421 bytes)
71. [TenTec] "End of an era" (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:56:43 -0400; N6KB: accomplish the same transfer of information many different ways, many of them more effectively if just the transfer of the information was the goal. HF communications can be automated to the po; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00586.html (9,617 bytes)
72. [TenTec] Orion no Tx, no main Rx (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:28:17 -0400; is that the Orion (1.373b5) K4IA: There's your problem. As I recall that version had an issue with lockups. No way. I've been using 1.373b5 for numerous contests, and can count the cumulative number; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00750.html (7,273 bytes)
73. [TenTec] Orion Comm Parameters (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 09:10:29 -0400; Try 57600. 73, Bill W4ZV; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00003.html (6,638 bytes)
74. [TenTec] Dual Receivers (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:25:43 -0400; N6KB: at least in the past decade or two ) and would be welcomed by low band operators wanting to use diversity/interferometry/phasing techniques to dig the DX out of the noise. Using DSP correlation; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00136.html (8,587 bytes)
75. [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:53:54 -0400; N4PY: II shows a consistent 6 hertz difference between the 2 receivers. My software now perfectly corrects this when in diversity mode. The offset is ~2.33 Hz in my Orion. How do you correct for frac; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00141.html (6,897 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] preventing keyclicks on an Orion I (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 06:48:25 -0400; kA4ICK: for the max in the menu to 10ms. I usually do not go above 25 wpm for contesting and dxing. My average ragchew speed is 20 wpm. Has anyone got expereince with this on their Orion I? Mark you; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00186.html (9,435 bytes)
77. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:21:07 -0400; K5UJ: NQ5T: I believe the Flex guys are on the right track with the SDR-X. It will use an embedded computer module (but I'm not sure which OS). I'm sure this will solve many configuration and perform; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00300.html (8,459 bytes)
78. [TenTec] SDR-1000 and SDR-X (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:55:08 -0400; W1CG: and similar radios in its price class. It is about equal in performance, some things a little better, some not as good. I have a K2/100 and an OMNI-VI as well as a SDR-1000 and I have compared; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00360.html (9,230 bytes)
79. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:06:07 -0400; W9OY: What that means is that I can put multiple independent transmitter outputs that have precisely the same frequency to an array of antennas that are independently adjustable. Imaging feeding 4 an; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00365.html (8,143 bytes)
80. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:56:49 -0400; Hi Lee, Thanks for your responses. I emphasize that I may well be one of the first to get an SDR-X (2 RX version) because of its potential for inband interference rejection, but I simply question the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00407.html (12,841 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]