Mail Archive Search: <+from:btippett@alum.mit.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 662 ]

Total 662 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Ten-Tec PA design (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:45:05 -0400; supply practice, and you should be fine. I hesitate to bring up the Air-Pax debate again, but can anyone explain why TT does not use the Air-Pax instead of a normal 25A fuse. Surely not cost in a $4k; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00410.html (8,184 bytes)
82. [TenTec] Ten-Tec PA design (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:42:27 -0400; of a fuse--well in a way they did--it's in their matching power supply. This is an electronic breaker not a magnetic and it works as good if not better than the magnetic. The fuse in the rig is then; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00415.html (9,965 bytes)
83. [TenTec] Ten-Tec PA design (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:03:18 -0400; I replied: I just called Ten-Tec service and they said Orion *does* need the external circuit breaker when a non-TT power supply is used. I told them they needed to add that caution to both Orion ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00422.html (10,332 bytes)
84. [TenTec] AirPax Purchase (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:24:46 -0400; W3DQ: two years, most recently two months ago, I'd be interested in a group buy of best choice (i.e., the instant trip device). Likewise where to/how to install. Eric, this is for not lightning prote; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00425.html (8,146 bytes)
85. [TenTec] Ten-Tec PA design (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:38:48 -0400; K0CQ: 25 amp breaker are likely to trip at less than 125% which they should hold indefinitely, that's 31.25 amps. That's why I use a 15 amp fuse to protect my Corsair II and it has so far. It seems t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00427.html (8,744 bytes)
86. [TenTec] SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:02:56 -0400; can never, no matter how much software it has, equal the performance of a Ten Tec receiver in the Orion. You can't put selectivity after the front end and fix problems inherent to the front end. That; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00439.html (8,749 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Orion Fuses = ATM-15 (not ATC-15) (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:59:57 -0400; Auto Parts store and buys Buss ATC 15A fuses, that is the wrong size for Orion. I'll take mine back and exchange them for the smaller size Orion uses. BTW cost was $2.44 including tax for 5. The corr; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00441.html (7,353 bytes)
88. [TenTec] SDR-1000 vs Orion vs SDR-X (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:02:16 -0400; can never, no matter how much software it has, equal the performance of a Ten Tec receiver in the Orion. You can't put selectivity after the front end and fix problems inherent to the front end. That; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00465.html (11,238 bytes)
89. [TenTec] SDR-1000 MDS (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:23:04 -0400; Just a quick note to clarify this. Lee W9OY first mentioned MDS of -160 dBm (measured with the new Janus soundcard not yet in production). From the Janus webpage I referenced previously: "Noise Floor; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00472.html (7,586 bytes)
90. [TenTec] PT5L (YT6A) WRTC Station Design and Recordings (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:21:54 -0400; YT1NT: Wow Sinisa! You definitely get my vote for the best station design. Too bad you could not use Orion. Any further explanation as to why? Congratulations on an outstanding design! 73, Bill W4ZV; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00648.html (7,115 bytes)
91. [TenTec] RSGB and ARRL Orion II reviews (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:38:30 -0400; FYI, ARRL used the optional Ten-Tec #2001 600 Hz filter for their tests per their normal policy of ordering any optional filters closest to their 500 Hz measurement bandwidth. Recall that ARRL did no; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00789.html (8,737 bytes)
92. [TenTec] orion 2 and 302r (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:55:03 -0400; K1RM: I just hooked up the 302r to my Orion 2. I not sure if I'm doing something incorrectly or if they 302r is not operating correctly. I cannot get the 302r to change bands as discribed on pg 34 of; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00792.html (7,932 bytes)
93. [TenTec] Fwd: orion 2 and 302r (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:20:41 -0400; VE7TK sent the following and Rick is correct...Rem Pod Enter must be set to VFO A Enter. Mine was set to VFO B Enter and was simply doing as programmed. Why you would want the Pod's Enter disassociat; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00797.html (9,490 bytes)
94. [TenTec] "Being a Contrarian . . ." (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:23:39 -0400; W3ULS: As I understand it, the subreceiver is basically a Jupiter (no steroids here). And having read (I believe it was R. Sherwood) someone's saying that 70 dB IMD3 is about all anyone will ever nee; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00827.html (8,493 bytes)
95. [TenTec] Omni-VI+ Phase Noise and INRAD roofing filter mod? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400; Jerry, here are some measurements by G3SJX (RSGB's test editor). He has been doing these tests consistently over an even longer period than ARRL in RSGB's RadCom magazine. Transceiver 10 kHz RMN 5 kH; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00023.html (8,562 bytes)
96. [TenTec] Omni-VI+ Phase Noise and INRAD roofing filter mod? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:47:24 -0400; More data from: http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Sherwood has been making these measurements consistently over many years: Transceiver 10 kHz LO Noise IMD 20 kHz IMD 2 kHz Orion -130 96 93 Corsair; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00024.html (8,650 bytes)
97. [TenTec] Omni-VI+ Phase Noise and INRAD roofing filter mod? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:18:14 -0400; N9DG: measurements are not very consistent for the spacing used to measure the LO phase noise: Orion (II) 10kHz Corsair 4kHz Omni VI+ 20kHz Sharp eyes Duane! I agree but Corsair was actually measured; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00028.html (8,427 bytes)
98. [TenTec] Omni-VI+ Phase Noise and INRAD roofing filter mod? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:53:51 -0400; N9DG: I highly doubt that is the case. I suspect that the Corsair holds up better as you get closer. From what I can tell the first radio that can truly match (I think may even exceed) a non synthes; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00039.html (8,178 bytes)
99. [TenTec] Orion II on order, filter questions (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:02:50 -0400; AC9S: The question - the manual recommends using a moderately wide CW roofing filter (1 khz) for general, non crowded, weak signal dx - due to increased loss with narrower filters. In the QST review; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00086.html (9,596 bytes)
100. [TenTec] RX-400 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:09:51 -0400; Ten-Tec has been working on this for years and continues to push out the availability date...now 2007. Specs don't look great for ham use but the TOI of 0 dBm @ 3 GHz is in the same ballpark as what; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00326.html (6,962 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]