Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Subreceiver RX-366 (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 21:33:14 -0500
Wonderful... Disappointed for sure... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00013.html (8,712 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 20:23:45 -0500
That's true if one has the space to dedicate another PC and monitor and mouse and whatever else is needed. Certainly that would be a bit easier to see but I would never run it on the same PC I'm usin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00031.html (13,231 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:57:41 -0500
I've had both...the only time I ran my Yaesu at 200 w out was when I wasn't using the amp...forget and dial it back on the newer amps and it can damage things... My amps were older and needed 125 or
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00078.html (11,872 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:00:14 -0500
Yep...it would be terrible to have to use a logging scale to be able to find ones net.... Ha... Cecil Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00081.html (21,035 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:31:05 -0500
I'm curious what mode he is running...I wouldn't expect that with one if the intermittent modes...but with AM, RTTY, or one of the digital modes sounds like he might be hitting a duty cycle limit. Ho
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00121.html (11,337 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ questions (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:34:34 -0500
I think two of the filter slots were termed as option slots....so 3 standard and 5 fully loaded. The voice synthesizer pretty much just annunciates the frequency displayed. Not sure what they are wor
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00122.html (8,025 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:57:44 -0500
Wow....didn't see that coming. RF Concepts (Alpha) and Ten-Tec. No telling what the future holds... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00162.html (7,713 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:09:51 -0500
And all under the RF Concepts banner... I'm guessing the Ten-Tec amps will either be discontinued or become the low end Alpha amps...there have been many asking for a more affordable Alpha amp design
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00167.html (15,958 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:30:57 -0500
And maybe you can explain that further..... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00214.html (8,438 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:37:26 -0500
John Thanks for taking the time to comment. Of course in times like these the rumor mill is running wide open...and understandably so...many of us feel like part of the Ten-Tec family. I've never own
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00216.html (11,306 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] TenTec and Alpha merger not a good thing (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:03:06 -0500
Been a year since you owned a Ten-Tec product but you remain a member of the list...strange. And I do disagree with you on several points. You sold the best SDR with a front panel radio when you sold
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00217.html (11,523 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:18:16 -0500
I haven't noticed any significant change in the HyGain product since being acquired by Mississippi based MFJ... I'm a Mississippian and am proud to have them manufactured in our state. Several of our
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00218.html (13,993 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:37:25 -0500
With today's rules you would most likely pay that tax no matter where they were based. Slowly we are being forced to pay state taxes on anything we buy through the internet. One way of trying to leve
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00224.html (9,100 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] TenTec and Alpha merger not a good thing (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:45:43 -0500
I agree...I think it will come at some point...were just not there yet. I'm happy with a pair of 3-500ZG's that don't balk at reflected power over 2.5:1 and can be replaced every 10 or 15 years for a
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00225.html (15,464 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] For Sale - Orion II 566AT SOLD (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 18:42:49 -0500
Dang I can't imagine someone spending that kind of money on old, outdated, antiquated, obsolete technology....:-) I paid $2800 for mine 3 or so years ago and feel like I could get my money out of it
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00312.html (8,169 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:20:23 -0500
Sent from my iPad I like you Bob...... But we will never agree on that one.... Too many documents and industry standards say and do otherwise.... First line of defense is definitely outside but not c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00314.html (11,119 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:23:37 -0500
No probably not but many of the principals can be scaled down as long as the basic rules are not ignored. And you are right it's relatively expensive and it won't work you any more DX for the money s
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00325.html (17,234 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:29:45 -0500
You had a ground loop of some sort....more than one path to ground can cause that... Your electrical panel ground for example should have been tied to that ground as well. Haphazardly stringing a bun
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00326.html (16,180 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:44:06 -0500
I'm not going to get into a huge debate about these issues because not everyone is going to agree...but! I think it important to differentiate these discussions between the two things that are trying
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00380.html (17,649 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 09:21:14 -0500
I can agree with "All lightning protection must BEGIN outside the structure." But the fact is we, by the very nature of building a radio station, have invited lightning inside by virtue of multiple c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00381.html (15,784 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu