Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Logic board (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:55:21 -0500
Thanks Clayton, He was on my list of folks to contact since he was involved in the discussions a year or so ago. Not sure if he will want to share too much of the secrets he might have discovered....
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00041.html (12,264 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Logic board (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:16:55 -0500
That part of the radio's history was during the previous owners possession. He didn't indicate how the problem started but didn't indicate lightning to be a contributor. The radio is a 9 out of 10 as
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00044.html (10,953 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Logic board (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:44:38 -0500
Great report Larry, Thanks Cecil... -- Original Message -- From: "Larry Belcher" <k4cl@arrl.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 11:20 A
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00050.html (12,994 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Logic board (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:46:31 -0500
The word of mouth on the Ten-Tec trip was that it was unrepairable due to unavailability of parts....specifically a chip but no indication as to which chip. Didn't get any paper work with the radio.
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00051.html (11,330 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] Station power supply?? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:30:47 -0500
I think it's important to differentiate between electrical safety grounding and lightning protection grounding because I think that is some of the confusion. The two are not the same and different te
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00113.html (15,761 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Station power supply?? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:08:49 -0500
I seem to remember this to be a touchy subject. Sorry to have fueled it in any way. I have a great deal of respect for both Jim and Bob and to avoid the risk of being alienated from this fellowship I
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00118.html (20,595 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] Station power supply?? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:09:12 -0500
One only has to spend 15 minutes in the Motorola R56 standard for lightning and surge protection grounding to understand the shortcomings of the NEC in properly protecting radio systems installations
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00125.html (12,067 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] station power supplies (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:15:54 -0500
I think that is when we will gain the ultimate efficiency for lighting...when we distribute DC power through our homes for lighting and avoid the inefficiencies in the crazy power supplies that are b
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00147.html (13,492 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] station power supplies (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:01:07 -0500
I would never suggest DC power distribution...I was thinking along the lines of a conversion at the home panel to low voltage DC for use with more simply designed LED lighting. I don't have first han
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00154.html (10,175 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:29:51 -0500
The fact is radio's are not test equipment. It is unreasonable to expect perfectly calibrated S meters and ultimate accuracy in the spectrum display. It's not a calibrated spectrum analyzer. You want
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00086.html (14,350 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:41:52 -0500
They only loose the sale if you go somewhere else and my guess is you ain't going nowhere because you have already had your Yaesu, Icom, Kenwood experience. If not you would have already dropped that
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00087.html (12,325 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:33:41 -0500
I'm not sure what issue you speak of on the Orion. I think it works quite well. It works differently than the Icom implementation but I find it to be better in many ways. Maybe you are speaking of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00106.html (12,034 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:41:36 -0500
I can't imagine what's not to like....on a decent SSB QSO the NR and RF gain can be adjusted to make it sound like it were on the local FM repeater. I've had several comments from visitors about the
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00124.html (13,334 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:01:49 -0500
Well lets scale it...100w autotune with advanced features for $785. Comparable American made technology...Alpha 1500w autotune with advanced features for $7950...oh and it don't do 6 meters...you hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00171.html (10,940 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:07:31 -0500
Jim I agree with you but the MS amps are a decent value...what you get for what you pay...and I think most agree that you get what you pay for...made in USA or not. I've repaired a few as well.... I'
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00172.html (10,638 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:07:20 -0500
You want cheap buy MFJ.... You get what you pay for... Cecil K5DL -- Original Message -- From: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent:
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00334.html (11,656 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:12:18 -0500
I agree..but you didn't have to yell.... Cecil -- Original Message -- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 5:
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00335.html (11,965 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:31:34 -0500
Interesting story Rick. Mine is not nearly as interesting nor that long ago. It's funny...I've seen Ten-Tec gear for years and why I never really seriously considered purchasing one I don't really kn
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00080.html (12,901 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:13:46 -0500
What...no Taylor? Cecil K5DL Taylor 710 LTD Dreadnought Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00157.html (12,953 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem gets very odd (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:11:08 -0500
Boy have I seen a bunch of those....and "Troubles Clear Leaving Here" Cecil K5DL -- Original Message -- From: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00325.html (14,945 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu