Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] 40m BCI and Ten-Tec vs. Elecraft (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 12:21:43 -0500
Jim sounds like you might be one of those Elecraft list watchers for Elecraft.. :-) ....but also here...which it doesn't appear from your posting that you continue to own a Ten-Tec transceiver. (just
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00444.html (14,106 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] rx 366 (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:31:09 -0500
That's what I keep a Drake R8B around for...Neither the old RX or the new one will work as well. Cecil K5DL -- Original Message -- From: <kc9cdt@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, Jun
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00037.html (10,479 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] Field Day Drill (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:28:44 -0500
Changed the Subject line...hope no one minds. Funny that should come up. We had a visitor to our site that asked the same question of all of our radio gear... And yes if there were an EMP event you c
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00149.html (11,236 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:39:18 -0500
I think anyone so put off by the slow operating practices of those on the other end of the path in persuit of a winning score should be required to spend the 24 hours manning the GOTA station working
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00151.html (16,009 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Sorry about the double post (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:49:52 -0500
That's ok...I showed it as a dupe. Good news is since it was a digital posting it counted for 2 points. Cecil K5DL -- Original Message -- From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net> To: "Discussi
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00184.html (10,592 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] Transmitter specs (was Top receivers) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 07:53:17 -0500
Sorry changed the subject line since the subject has changed... This comes at a time when I am trying to make sense of some problems with my station. I'm a recent Ten-Tec convert having bought a used
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00092.html (13,599 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:53:33 -0500
Thanks Jim -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Brown" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> My RFI tutorial offers both a detailed discussion of how RFI occurs and detailed recommendations for fixing it. http:/
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00110.html (10,000 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] Transmitter specs (was Top receivers) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:29:16 -0500
One TV in question is stand alone..no external speakers. Tuning the station will cause that TV to switch on and then you can't turn it off without unplugging it and letting it sit for a while. My mod
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00111.html (18,965 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] Transmitter specs (was Top receivers) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:06:12 -0500
I don't agree with the central ground point utilization unless it is the station power supply which is the only DC zero voltage point. That DC voltage point should be connected to the external groun
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00124.html (12,677 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:32 -0500
Maybe I'm being overly optimistic about human nature, but I think most hams would be receptive to suggestions about improving the quality of their signals. I agree with you Jim, I certainly want my
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00127.html (10,309 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 08:13:32 -0500
Just my 2 cents worth.... Your grounding work shouldn't start just outside the wall from the radio gear...it really should start at the tower and be an antenna/tower grounding "System" designed to st
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00292.html (15,076 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] 425 value? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:50:57 -0500
Our club bought a used one recently for some club station contesting. Paid $1800. I tested it recently for the club and it worked fine. 85 watts in 1700 out into my dummy load.. Nice old amp. Cecil K
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00303.html (8,005 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 07:37:15 -0500
Cecil, You are spot on. A direct ground strike will develop up to 400 kA-pk. At 5 ohms that is a serious voltage surge. The Voltage Surge will have a very fast rise time (less than 100nS), the curre
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00309.html (11,091 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with Omni (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:17:38 -0500
Might want to do the same inquery on the Hex Beam. I've heard it's a great expedition asset but not so much for a permanent station installation. (out performed easily by other basic yagis) No person
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00358.html (10,356 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with Omni [hexbeam/directional arrays] (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 12:56:54 -0500
I agree... I do see many love the antenna especially for restricted/limited installation locations. Cecil... -- Original Message -- From: "Gene Story - Earthlink" <gfstory@earthlink.net> To: "Discuss
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00362.html (16,007 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] DUAL CONVERSION (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:51:54 -0500
Correct and the accepted definition of Dual Conversion in the world of Superhetrodyne receiver design would be a radio with two distinct RF frequency IF's before detection or demodulation to audio. C
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00173.html (13,095 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] new rx in Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:31:06 -0500
I don't believe the spectrum display works on the sub receiver. I think that is a hardware thing....it probably won't ever work in the Sub receiver..at least not in the OII. Just my best guess though
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00220.html (7,967 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029 ---Spectrum Display &Tuning dot (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:30:18 -0500
Not sure what version you updated from. I haven't seen that little dot on mine (2.044) but recently updated to 3.029. Dot sounds like a nice idea because with the display freezing it is hard to tell
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00249.html (10,472 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029 ---SpectrumDisplay &Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:48:55 -0500
Thanks for the input Ray.. I continue to try different settings but the 20hz has worked well for me also. Seems the biggest player is the RF gain setting as well.. It seems to determine the depth the
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00257.html (11,341 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029---SpectrumDisplay &Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:29:53 -0500
It depends on what you are doing with the radio... Chasing DX at the noise level it's a feature mostly only high end radio's have. Many don't work well but those that are implemented properly make a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00302.html (11,919 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu