Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:18:16 -0500
I haven't noticed any significant change in the HyGain product since being acquired by Mississippi based MFJ... I'm a Mississippian and am proud to have them manufactured in our state. Several of our
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00219.html (14,315 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:37:25 -0500
With today's rules you would most likely pay that tax no matter where they were based. Slowly we are being forced to pay state taxes on anything we buy through the internet. One way of trying to leve
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00225.html (9,043 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] TenTec and Alpha merger not a good thing (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:45:43 -0500
I agree...I think it will come at some point...were just not there yet. I'm happy with a pair of 3-500ZG's that don't balk at reflected power over 2.5:1 and can be replaced every 10 or 15 years for a
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00226.html (14,424 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] For Sale - Orion II 566AT SOLD (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 18:42:49 -0500
Dang I can't imagine someone spending that kind of money on old, outdated, antiquated, obsolete technology....:-) I paid $2800 for mine 3 or so years ago and feel like I could get my money out of it
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00313.html (8,479 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:20:23 -0500
Sent from my iPad I like you Bob...... But we will never agree on that one.... Too many documents and industry standards say and do otherwise.... First line of defense is definitely outside but not c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00315.html (10,841 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:23:37 -0500
No probably not but many of the principals can be scaled down as long as the basic rules are not ignored. And you are right it's relatively expensive and it won't work you any more DX for the money s
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00326.html (17,420 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:29:45 -0500
You had a ground loop of some sort....more than one path to ground can cause that... Your electrical panel ground for example should have been tied to that ground as well. Haphazardly stringing a bun
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00327.html (15,477 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 08:44:06 -0500
I'm not going to get into a huge debate about these issues because not everyone is going to agree...but! I think it important to differentiate these discussions between the two things that are trying
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00381.html (17,846 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 09:21:14 -0500
I can agree with "All lightning protection must BEGIN outside the structure." But the fact is we, by the very nature of building a radio station, have invited lightning inside by virtue of multiple c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00382.html (16,131 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:40:09 -0500
Yep...agree...all points... Cecil Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00396.html (19,319 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] Grounding manual for Hams (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 09:13:55 -0500
But don't expect it to provide a clue as to how to build a ground system for proper lightning protection...it is concerned most about electrical safety grounding...important but not the all inclusive
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00414.html (16,774 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 22:52:36 -0500
It's sad the stereotypical view some have of the Deep South. Quality of life is just fine...in fact you don't even know what you are missing. We may talk a bit slow but are educated just the same. We
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00457.html (12,869 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] Grounds (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 23:09:13 -0500
Dang...and I've been thinking all these years the work we do at all these commercial transmitter sites has been doing some good.... Guess I need to look for other work.... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPa
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00458.html (13,167 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:28:22 -0500
Not if his focus is providing lightning protection...he is spot on. Jim your concepts are fine in a studio somewhere but show up at a cell/tower site with them and they will run you off with a stick.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00490.html (10,994 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:06:28 -0500
Can't agree with you on that....to a lightning strike there is no differentiation. Cecil K5DL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00492.html (10,614 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 20:05:10 -0500
I agree...I'd buy that. That said I would also like to see Ten-Tec do a blow out flagship to showcase the best they are capable of. It would be a low volume unit but would be competitive with the Ico
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00520.html (14,981 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 21:32:23 -0500
Oh don't read me wrong...never said the Orion was not a giant killer...it was. Keyword here is WAS. All the others mentioned are still being made and have some killer bells and whistles you would exp
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00524.html (11,503 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:59:44 -0500
Good discussion. My only issue is I have a tendency to do more DXing and I don't consider the Eagle a tool I would choose for that job. I also press my DXing rig into contest duty which is easily don
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00536.html (14,955 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:09:30 -0500
Rick it's more the way I work split frequency pile ups than a skimmer thing. Also I had hopes for a diversity receive setup for 160m...thus the RX-366.....that is now discontinued. Am glad to have my
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00538.html (18,460 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] The Next Flagship (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:44:33 -0500
Taking mental stock of the DX group I'm a member of, there are the following represented: 2 Orion's 1 FT-5000 Several IC-7600's At least 2 IC-7800's 2 FT-1000 series 2 or 3 IC-756 Pro series 1 FT-120
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00552.html (13,438 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu