Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chestert@pressroom.com: 73 ]

Total 73 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Re: [CW] Kachina vs. Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 1998 20:47:54 -0400
--==_42565765==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Jim...Unfortunately I can only offer you what I was told via email about the Kachina. Someone was using it at a special event station
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00094.html (16,734 bytes)

22. Fwd: [TenTec] Re: [CW] Kachina vs. Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 15:15:43 -0400
--==_16864275==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Fortunately most hams who frequent the TenTec reflector are not like this one: turn Chester Alderman Tom - W4BQF chestert@pressroom.c
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00110.html (10,462 bytes)

23. Fwd: Re: [TenTec] Apology to Chester -W4BQF (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 19:49:27 -0400
--==_33293935==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: <tentec@contesting.com> manual. At the time I did recall that your kind of problem would occur if one of the menu items was not s
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00116.html (15,999 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Re: K2 CW Break-in Performance (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 22:59:12 -0400
--==_710089==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" No Eric, I was totally uninformed and I made the mistake of saying K2, when I should have said Kachina!! I certainly apologize to you a
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00128.html (11,280 bytes)

25. [TenTec] Omni Six Filter 'Blow-By' (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 13:34:01 -0400
I sure do have to agree with Del in his experiences with the Omni Six under contest conditions. As I have mentioned (too many times!), I used my Omni Six on several occasions, operating the 80 m posi
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00158.html (7,971 bytes)

26. [TenTec] New Rig (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 20:00:55 -0400
--==_54436558==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" For a new mid-range rig, some of the things I would like to have available are: 1) No FM...Roofing filter 4.0 kc. 2) Relays for T/R s
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00212.html (11,006 bytes)

27. [TenTec] Mid range T-T (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:03:21 -0400
I'm really trying to be quite here, but I guess I can't! Scott, I'm not sure why you put the Omni 6 in the 'niche' catagory, but perhaps you have a defination of the word 'niche'. Since I have compar
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00238.html (9,493 bytes)

28. [TenTec] It's Here! (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 22:39:54 -0400
--==_25115184==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Ya'll may as well say your 73's to Jim. For sure you won't see him on this reflector for a while!!! Congrats Jim....but your going to
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00304.html (10,980 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 20:18:04 -0400
--==_3834055==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" This is not a personal attack on John, KE6PID, but I just cant let those comments about the Omni 6 go unanswered without a little rebu
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00083.html (13,560 bytes)

30. [TenTec] Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 21:56:59 -0400
--==_9754695==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Yikes, I may be in trouble Steve, I just got an email from Chuck - W7MAP saying he has already tried the FT-1000 MP against his Omni 6
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00084.html (8,554 bytes)

31. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:40:55 -0400
--==_1377585==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Clark...A filter more narrow that the 2.4kc first IF filter will not work in that position unless you do some retuning of the basic ri
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00182.html (11,033 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Corsair II AGC (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 14:12:36 -0400
This won't help much right now, but I'll keep digging. Some years ago (10?), there was a capacitor change near the audio output amplifier, maybe it was near the QSK transistor that shut off the audio
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00045.html (10,391 bytes)

33. [TenTec] Century 21 PTO Repair (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 1998 13:02:04 -0400
Isn't it a treat to Monday morning quarterback? What's the typical life of a PTO ? Do you know or do you just love to bitch? TenTec supports their gear for a VERY long time. What kind of warranty do
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00081.html (10,416 bytes)

34. [TenTec] OH, MANNNNN.... (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 12:58:22 -0400
Fortunately for us, Ten Tec has been 'tentative' for over 20 years now! Maybe if Apple had the guts to join the free entirprise competative manfacturing business, Apple would not be so 'tentative' n
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00193.html (8,421 bytes)

35. [TenTec] Offset Filter (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 16:35:24 -0400
Received my 250 Hz offset filter today from TT. Will take some time getting used to this! Chester Alderman W4BQF -- Tom chestert@pressroom.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm S
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00064.html (6,648 bytes)

36. [TenTec] New TT 221 Filter (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 09:42:33 -0400
As noted in a previous email, I received my new 250Hz low offset filter yesterday. Last night I removed my 9MHz 500 Hz filter and replaced it with the new filter. My first impressions were disasterou
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00072.html (8,692 bytes)

37. [TenTec] RF Cables (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 00:58:59 -0400
I need to buy/build four RF test cables for the Omni 6+ ( same cable/connector on most all TenTec rigs). Does anyone know the nomenclature of their RF connector used for inter-board connections? Anyo
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00239.html (6,987 bytes)

38. [TenTec] Tentec Net? (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 07:18:19 -0400
Well, it's not a 'net', but you will find hordes of TenTec owners hanging out around 7.030-7.033 MHz most any evening. Anywhere from 10 wpm on up to 80+ wpm. on? Chester Alderman W4BQF -Tomchestert@p
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00039.html (7,841 bytes)

39. [TenTec] User must have web problems (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 22:40:56 -0400
I think your lack of knowledge of how the internet works is shining brightly. It does not matter if you access the net via a 300 baud connection, a T1 line, or fiber; if the net is overloaded, your T
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00221.html (9,085 bytes)

40. [TenTec] Filters (score: 1)
Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman)
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 06:55:23 -0400
I called TenTec about a month ago inquiring about the special center frequency filters and was told I would get a card in the mail telling me when they would be shipped. So far nothing additional hea
/archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00378.html (6,834 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu