Mail Archive Search: <+from:cjm@qvssoftware.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:cjm@qvssoftware.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Omni V vs. Headphones (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:14:31 -0500; Mark, Just add 100 ohm resistors in series with the headphones. You can do this inside the headphone jack on the headphones. With 8 ohm headphones, you end up being too efficient. Carl Moreschi N4PY; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00905.html (8,701 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten Tec] Pegasus keying...was More About Clix (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:11:44 -0500; Mark, Radio Shack part number 32-1031. They are $7 a piece. Get two of them and wire them so you go from 8 ohms to high impedance and then back to 8 ohms. Carl Moreschi 919-676-1991 x135 -- Original; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00008.html (8,742 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] re: pegasus internal tuner (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:18:31 -0500; I think this thread has developed down a bad stream. First of all, there are a lot of pegasus internal tuners out there and most are doing very well. Second, it is normal for two different SWR meters; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00121.html (9,804 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] CW keying weight (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:12:11 -0500; Mark, The CW weight adjustment is to make up for slow keying characteristics of a particular transceiver. What you are striving for is the end result coming out of the transceiver is a perfect 3 to 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00202.html (9,342 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Split operation, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:50:42 -0500; Mark, Your split DX requirements are implemented in my Pegasus software. Let me explain how it goes. First I'll assume you are using the Pegasus only with the remote tuning pod. The remote tuning pod; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00330.html (12,642 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Split operation, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:59:34 -0500; One reason I made the remote tuning pod so configurable with 26 functions to pick from is, you can perform operations from the remote pod WITHOUT the need for the N4PY pegasus control program to be i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00334.html (10,520 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ zipper (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:34:56 -0500; Ron, The 160 band has a very high atmospheric noise level. It is not a good band to test receiver sensitivity. Compare weak signals on the FT990 and Omni VI before you decide that the Omni VI front e; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00558.html (9,035 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Power Supply Overcurrent (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <cjm@qvssoftware.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:37:04 -0400; This is just to reiterate what has been gone previously in this forum. The magnetic circuit breaker is NOT required in the following Ten-Tec radios: Paragon Paragon II Omni V Omni VI Pegasus Jupiter; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00053.html (6,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]