- 101. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, 422 and 253? (score: 1)
- Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
- Please not you doNOT have an Omni VI+, you have an Amni VI rev3 which is equivalent to a VI+ but is still a VI. The VI+ is a 564 and yours is a 563. 73 Clayton N4EV On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:01 PM
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00120.html (7,935 bytes)
- 102. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, 422 and 253? (score: 1)
- Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 05:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Sir: I too have both. The 564 is the VI+ while the 563 no mater what revision, is a VI. You need to get the right info for the guys at TenTec. They are the same as far as the electronics go, but yo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00131.html (10,953 bytes)
- 103. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
- Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
- I have been following this thread for a bit and I'd like to add a comment. I have been using CQRlog for some time now and it does support the Eagle. The support is not fully tested as yet, but it w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00103.html (20,426 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu