Mail Archive Search: <+from:clayton

Results:

References: [ +from:clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com: 103 ]

Total 103 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI WANTED (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 05:44:30 -0700 (PDT); How cheep??? I'm considering selling my Omni VI. Just do not have the time to work on it. Clayton N4EV Hi, I am looking for an Omni 6, CHEAP. Lightning struck, dropped, rained on, cosmetics not imp; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00083.html (9,732 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:53:13 -0700 (PDT); Steve: I concur with your views. Been in ham radio since 1969 and have had several rigs. The one I miss the most is the Heath SB-102. I now have a Jupiter and an Omni VI that has the VI+ upgrade.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00135.html (11,117 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Low-Power Tuner (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:56:56 -0700 (PDT); Joe: I have a SG-239 Smarttuner I bought a few years back and it works great. This tuner does not have a weatherproof housing, but can be put in something and used outdoors. It tunes really fast an; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00144.html (8,278 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Count to Ten B4 Cussing Ten Tec (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:30:27 -0700 (PDT); Are those ground rods connected to the electrical service ground! I not, you run a greater risk that not having a ground. During a lightnibg strike you want everything to rise to the same potential; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00159.html (10,400 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Autotuner upgrade? (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:57:16 -0800 (PST); In going back to the broadcast days, we always put the tuner AT the antenna and had a "flat" line for the antenna to the transmitter. Works better than a line full of VSWR in the shack. In my view,; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00421.html (9,511 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Autotuner upgrade? (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:53:57 -0800 (PST); Rick, Your idea will work, but I have an auto tuner at the antenna and using less than 300 watts, it works great. Don't have any "hot" mikes or strange things going on with the computer, or other we; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00427.html (11,795 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Autotuner upgrade? (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:23:59 -0800 (PST); Rick: Had an engineer friend at Collins several years ago made the statement that "SWR will circulate until it's disapated. Either on it's 5th trip to the antenna or tank circuit." That might mak; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00442.html (15,317 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Orion II AM settings (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 08:05:19 -0800 (PST); Barry: Watch your bandwidth! AM Signals should be no more that 6khz wide and you are 7.4 khz with that 3.9 khz setting!. Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: Pumbaa <pinkertontommrs@; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00044.html (9,554 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Testimonials from HQ (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 05:25:01 -0800 (PST); All those 8s and 9s have a funny accent to me. Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment' <tentec@contesting.com> S; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00126.html (9,179 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI + Interconnect Schematic (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:46:09 -0800 (PST); Wayne: I have an Omni VI rev 3 and I'm sure there is a drawing the the 563 manual. I'll look a bit later today for you. I did a quick check on the 564 book that I downloaded and you're right! It; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00173.html (8,473 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI + Interconnect Schematic (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:37:55 -0800 (PST); Wayne: There is an interconnect drawing in my 563 manual. I'll try to copy and attach to an email. Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> To: Discussi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00176.html (9,718 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI + Interconnect Schematic (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:27:09 -0800 (PST); Hello Barry: Yes, I'll include you in the feed too. I'll try to get that this PM 73 Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> To: Clayton Brantley <clayt; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00183.html (11,749 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Omni6/Omni6+ AGC pop on cw leading edge (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:26:51 -0800 (PST); disconnect plug 52 on the if/af board. I never noticed the problem, but my ear is not that "refined"! HI 73 Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> To:; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00196.html (8,824 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI + Interconnect Schematic (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:44:56 -0800 (PST); Wayne: The differences between a 563 and 564 are only minor. My 563 is a rev 3 which makes electrically the same as a 564. Tentec replaced 3 boards and changed a few of the front panel buttons. T; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00197.html (8,264 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Centurion (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:33:14 -0800 (PST); The manual should give you a clue. Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: k2ep <k2ep@nycap.rr.com> To: TenTec@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 7:14 PM Subject: [TenTec] Ce; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00272.html (7,781 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Centurion meter lamps (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:42:04 -0800 (PST); According to the manual, there are 4 lamps that feed from the QSK board +12 line. Don't remember off hand what the 12 equivalent of the old #47 6 volt lamp is, but should work. Manual also mentions; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00292.html (8,967 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] OT: Old QSTs, CQs, etc. (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:25:36 -0800 (PST); Rick: The FIRST thing I had to do when I retired was to buy a battery operated wrist watch, I didn't have time to wind my old one! HI You are right on with the Honey-do list... I work my &^% off a; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00306.html (11,201 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] grounds (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:38:32 -0800 (PST); AMEN!!!!! Well said Jim! Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> To: tentec@contesting.com Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00133.html (9,885 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Looking for OmniVI parts (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:53:45 -0800 (PST); I have a non-working 563 rev 3 that needs a PLL board. If you find a unit with a working one you could spare, keep me in mind. Clayton N4EV ________________________________ From: "n5bi@juno.com" <n; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00397.html (8,285 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Rsc value for LM723 in 280/255 power supplies? (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:19:48 -0700 (PDT); Sounds like the "normal" way for a '723 supply to die. I would keep the power transformer IF it's ok, then build a supply using the 7815 regulator controlling the base of a darlington pair. K4EAJ; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00018.html (9,543 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]