Mail Archive Search: <+from:cshinn@connect.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:cshinn@connect.net: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Jupiter AM Problem (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (cshinn); Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 08:35:56 -0600; result; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-10/msg00230.html (7,114 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Apples and Oranges? (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (cshinn); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:43:21 -0600; Has anyone in the group had a Jupiter next to an Omni 6+ on the same bench at the same time doing a A/B during a big contest? I know what an Omni sounds like with cascaded filters (500hz) I am primar; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00214.html (7,348 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Jupiter Question (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (cshinn); Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:20:19 -0600; A the risk of sounding naive.....what is the "Multi" knob on the Jup FP? Some sort of multi function thingy?? Thanks, Chuck -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00236.html (6,584 bytes)
4. [TenTec] One More Silly Question (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (cshinn); Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:52:13 -0600; On the Jupiter....is there a rear apron or other jack that would accomodate a second receive antenna? If so is it switched to mute the second receiver? CHuck -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00238.html (6,542 bytes)
5. [TenTec] More Peg/Jup Questions (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (cshinn); Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:59:28 -0600; Early in the product life of these rigs there were some complaints viz shape factors of the cw filters. Complaints varied but I believe they were likened to have shpes of 1:3? Someone else also sugge; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00295.html (6,872 bytes)
6. [TenTec] $1200 Problem (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (chuck shinn); Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 18:53:13 -0500; Your right, it is an exercise in economics. Typical American cost of sales to sales ratios run 3 to 1. This means that if the consumer price is 1200 dollars then the unit manufacturing cost should be; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00230.html (10,550 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Herc II (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (chuck shinn); Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 13:36:45 -0500; I have an excellent Herc II for sale with matching PS. 1300.00 You ship. E-mail inquires invited. Best, Chuck. PGP E-Mail Preferred. Use PGP 5.5.X RSA/Idea for 2.6.X Compatibility. 0x2A44BE01 Key ID.; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00320.html (6,700 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Remote Cable for the Herc II (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (chuck shinn); Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 07:53:27 -0500; Can anyone on the list help with a the pinout for the Omni-6 to HercII cable? I can find the Molex pinout for the Herc II but cant seem to find the Omni-6 end of the cable. I'd like to build the cabl; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00164.html (7,047 bytes)
9. [TenTec] QRV (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 06:55:51 -0600; ROSS OLE' BUDDY; Surely your aware of the added drain on the internal QSO counter built into the microprocessor pipeline architecture? This undocumented feature insures cash flow in a positive way to; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00021.html (8,841 bytes)
10. [TenTec] CQ Magazine review of Omni-VI+ (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 10:59:11 -0600; I agree. It would appear that virtually all equipment reviews are tainted by the inability of the reviewer to express themselves because of real or imaginary "Loss of Advertising Revenue". Business i; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00032.html (10,035 bytes)
11. [TenTec] CQ Magazine review of Omni-VI+ (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 21:05:45 -0600; Great Idea....The internet is free. Wonder how long it would take to get quality input to a Owners Report Reflector? Or as a feature of an existing reflector as a monthly / bimonthly feature....Hmmmm; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00057.html (13,301 bytes)
12. [TenTec] CQ Magazine review of Omni-VI+ (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 07:21:58 -0600; The only area that I would dissagree with you is one of comprehensive answers. The owners report format allows for someone (presumably technically competant) to prepare a questionaire that is pretty; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00075.html (10,961 bytes)
13. [TenTec] (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 20:35:31 -0600; [Charles D. Shinn] Hi all; several weeks ago I alluded to a service issue that I had with Ten Tec. I did this in a public forum because I was frustrated at not having received a return phone call. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00059.html (6,909 bytes)
14. [TenTec] The demise of manufacture (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 19:42:56 -0600; --Original Message-- From: rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> To: Jim and Kate Belt <jkbelt@spiritone.com>; tentec list <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 19; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-01/msg00276.html (10,297 bytes)
15. [TenTec] FT-1000D (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 07:59:01 -0600; [Charles D. Shinn] I cannot say anythng about TenTec service yet- I have never had to use them for emergency service. My radio is however, in for the Option 3 upgrade. For one year I had an FTT-1000D; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00103.html (7,421 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Custom Filters? (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:49:26 -0600; I understand that Network Sciences in Arizona is the vendor for Ten Tec. Years ago they also made the filters for Drake. I recently had a fowl experience with sending my Omni in for upgrade and would; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00229.html (9,085 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Omni VII input (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 07:59:22 -0600; Why not just put the transciever funtion on a PCAMCIA card and shove it into a laptop. Fully integrate the transciever funtions with TR or CT and a TSR logging program for awards tracking. QRP out to; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00230.html (9,205 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Cornfused (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 08:12:03 -0600; Why do we have 2 reflectors? I subscribed to one or the other (I forget which) and never recieved anything. Then I sub'ed to the other and all was well with the world. Except I see that when I post t; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00231.html (6,933 bytes)
19. FW: [TenTec] Omni VII input (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 09:38:08 -0600; Why not just put the transciever funtion on a PCAMCIA card and shove it into a laptop. Fully integrate the transciever funtions with TR or CT and a TSR logging program for awards tracking. QRP out to; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00234.html (9,868 bytes)
20. [TenTec] FW: Welcome to tentec (score: 1): Author: cshinn@connect.net (Charles D. Shinn); Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 13:58:12 -0600; Sorry to garbage-up the list with this but I got a response from the list admin @contesting.com and lost the address. So, Ed here is the saved majordomo from the "Other" list/ tentec@qth.net. It woul; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-12/msg00238.html (10,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]