- 141. [TenTec] BPL suit (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:19:24 -0700
- on a big dog. Merely an irritation. Segway to the 1000-100,000-200,000 (pick a number) hams and communications equipment users simply signing a paper agreeing to be plantiffs in a class action suit a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00641.html (9,821 bytes)
- 142. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ and Opt3 (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:44:03 -0800
- The OMNI-6 option 3 is said to be equivalent in specs to the plus. It has the same features. There are just a few small changes to the plus, all surface mounted components on the boards, the TCXO sta
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00228.html (9,215 bytes)
- 143. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II question on filters (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:03:06 -0800
- Which filters must stay with the radio? I would say for sure the 285 and 282 can go. The 220 filter, I am not sure. Is it needed for SSB or just the unidentified filter? The unidentifiable filter, I
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00802.html (8,296 bytes)
- 144. [TenTec] FS items (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:30:59 -0800
- I have some surplus, I am finally in escrow on my first home (wish me luck!) Soon I can set up a real antenna. A few things will need to go before I move. Ten Tec model 206A calibrator. This was norm
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00502.html (7,894 bytes)
- 145. [TenTec] FS items sold, one remains (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:23:31 -0800
- I have sold the 301, 307 and 206. The 705 mike remains if anyone wants one, it does very nice audio for the Ten Tec rigs, I just find I now prefer the D-104, it fits in my hands better :-) . Clark WA
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00533.html (6,773 bytes)
- 146. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D, Why so quiet ? (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:34:56 -0800
- Rick has this right. The early OMNI rigs were not very sensitive on the low bands but the sensitivity increased with frequency. This is one very easy explanation for the "quiet" receiver characterist
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00583.html (9,929 bytes)
- 147. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D, Why so quiet ? (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:40:14 -0800
- In my own careful experiments with the OMNI-C vs the TS-440 (ladder vs ceramic followed by monolithic lattice filters) the static levels are the same for the same level of sensitivity. If I cut back
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00596.html (10,162 bytes)
- 148. [TenTec] About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:03:34 -0800
- Yuri, I value your contributions and hope you'll participate in the orion@contesting.com reflector if you are truly leaving this reflector. .............. 73, Barry N1EU Yuri..... I agree with Barry
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00947.html (11,721 bytes)
- 149. [TenTec] FS Items (score: 1)
- Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:16:34 -0800
- Some stuff I'd like to sell to finance my mobile/portable setup. We just had a 6.5 quake nearby (got me motivated to charge my 2 RV batteries, make up power cables, and order a mobile/portable rig...
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01221.html (7,665 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu