Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:csturner@kcbx.net: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] New roofing filter in Omni VI- Opt. 1 (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:45:25 -0800
As I grow older my ability to differentiate signal from noise is changing in different frequency bands. Though it takes more concentration, I find now (I turned 50 last year) that I often listen belo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00392.html (9,516 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] CW Audio tone (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:46:21 -0800
I think that it would not be hard to get the OMNI VI down to a lower CW note by use of the PBT and by getting the 9 MHz filter chain to the correct center frequency. Ten Tec built the model 221 to hi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00413.html (9,030 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Looking backward? (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:05:24 -0800
The roofing filter mod does not give up any modes at all. It is a simple 4 pole filter switched in/out of the line according to the NAR filter switch positions. But the point is well taken, the origi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00433.html (9,506 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Binaural (Stereo) CW Redux! (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:34:18 -0800
On Jan 13, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Barry N1EU wrote: Rick, this isn't my first brush with binaural "magic". I got the latest and greatest DSP599ZX when it came out several years ago because of the binaural
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00477.html (10,668 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:30:27 -0800
On Jan 14, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Ken Brown wrote: Hi Rick, Yes I understand where that Inrad mod puts the new roofing filter. I guess what I did not understand is that with only one NAR button on the Om
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00493.html (10,131 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:17:25 -0800
On Jan 16, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Rick and Karen Bunn wrote: Would this kit work in the Corsair II or the Paragon II? The Corsair should have no need for such a thing. You don't have a wide roofing filte
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00641.html (10,131 bytes)

47. [TenTec] OMNI VI product detector IMD (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:42:33 -0800
Hey all - Anyone with an early OMNI VI do the Ten Tec modification to improve the in-passband performance of the product detector? I do not mean the 2nd order IMD mod that is done on the RF board (I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00671.html (7,373 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:07:50 -0800
On Jan 20, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Duane Budd wrote: "There is no advantage over it vs. the master heater oven previously used..." so says Scott Robbins, and he should know what he is talking about. Howeve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00859.html (9,057 bytes)

49. [TenTec] Inrad taking orders for Omni VI roofing filter***500hz. (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:28:39 -0800
I may want to get just the crystal filter since I already have the board in my OMNI VI, but how big a deal is this? I use the model 221 filter (my favorite) and the 600 Hz roofing filter centered whe
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01156.html (8,355 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Inrad taking orders for Omni VI roofing filter***500hz (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:42:01 -0800
Roger and Chuck - Thanks for the explanations, it is good to see the basics of the argument for a different center frequency. I believe I was the first guy to have the 221 (after bugging Ten Tec alon
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01162.html (11,959 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut 505 value? (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:59:44 -0800
Hi Jeff - Heck, I bought one of these way back when, took it "backpack mobile" up into the Delaware Water Gap, too. Those were the days (not necessarily better, but I sure was younger!) The 505 has a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00553.html (7,790 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] mystery Ten-Tec Omni (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:05:49 -0800
I've seen a lot of hams unaware of the problem Mike points out. Tune a receiver around your transmitted signal, you'll see that you've got a serious spur out of band, but close enough that your anten
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00592.html (7,856 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI/VI+ Roofing Filter Mod. vs NB Function andFM/FSK Mode Operation (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:16:29 -0800
Thanks for the info regarding the NB, Dave. I think you pioneered (I recall some early correspondence with you on this!) the roofing filter ideas for the OMNI VI. I appreciate it. One note to this (e
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00784.html (8,653 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] 2.4 kcs filter (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:18:21 -0800
Hi Jim - Which one do you need? There is one for the 9 MHz IF (model 220) and one for the 6.3 MHz IF (I don't think there is a model number). Clark WA3JPG ____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00290.html (7,227 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Noise Blanker in Corsair (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:32:29 -0800
Heck, it works. It just doesn't work on a very wide variety of noise pulses. I've taken advantage of mine on occasion, it certainly took out automobile ignition noise pretty well, but many other nois
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00438.html (7,641 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Noise Blanker in Corsair (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:58:08 -0800
The best thing I did with the Corsair was to get an ANC-4 noise canceller. That little unit took a little fiddling, but it took out much noise, power lines, ignition and even some of the atmospherics
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00441.html (8,072 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Noise Blanker in Corsair (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:46:32 -0800
No, that is a problem. Check on the MFJ 1026, I think it had provisions for QSK (I have one but it is in the garage, I could tell you tomorrow). Clark WA3JPG _________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00492.html (8,941 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:08:25 -0800
You know, the NYE tuner is truly "built like a tank" but I had one and gave it up pretty quickly because the tuning range was more limited on my particular antennas than for my Johnson matchbox and m
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00540.html (8,210 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI freq instability, 30m only (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 19:53:09 -0700
Hi Allan! Do you have the oven or the TCXO? If TCXO, I don't know how to help, but if the oven, I bought a new one :-) It was the (well known) "hunting" behavior of some of the earlier ovens, they we
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00065.html (8,495 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] TenTec S-Meters (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:43:34 -0700
Hi Pete - This can be as simple as static cling :-) . Try wiping the plastic face with a moist cloth and see if it stops. If so, clean the thing (inside and out) of dust. I "fixed" a few this way. Cl
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00447.html (8,210 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu