Mail Archive Search: <+from:cw_de

Results:

References: [ +from:cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net: 405 ]

Total 405 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Earth those feeders (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:26:20 -0500; Yes, they drive ground rods like they're goin' through buttah! Kim N5OP _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00276.html (10,604 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:32:09 -0500; I must have missed the original discussion of this. It sounds pretty neat! From what I gather here, the RX366 will for all intents and purposes make the sub RX equivalent to the main RX. Complete wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00459.html (11,485 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] eagle speech processor (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:55:30 -0600; Sound like RF getting in someplace. Is the antenna well-matched (low SWR)? Is the rig properly grounded? Are you too close to the antenna? Connectors good and tightened properly? If everything seems; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00173.html (7,648 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:58:28 -0600; That's interesting to hear because I don't get such fast QSK with my O II. For CW I have it set as 0% delay, internal keyer off (I use an external unit just because) and CW rise/fall at 3 mS (as fast; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00285.html (10,633 bytes)
125. [TenTec] Muting Orion II (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:45:50 -0600; I'm thinking about using it with a boat anchor transmitter that has muting contacts -- aside from pressing the AF gain encoder knobs, is there a way to mute the O II receiver externally? Kim N5OP ___; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00365.html (6,655 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] Orion s-meter calibration (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:52:05 -0600; Now that's interesting. It doesn't work on my O II, however. Anyone know if there's an equivalent trick with the O II? Kim N5OP _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00342.html (9,532 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1 Smudge on the Screen. (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:08:51 -0600; I think the display is user-replaceable. No need for a new rig! N5OP _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00109.html (7,023 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:27:50 -0600; I think that's a bit unfair to Jim. I know he's a big boy, now, and can fight his own battles. Still, read carefully what he wrote and you'll see that he doesn't claim authorship of anything. He clai; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00027.html (10,962 bytes)
129. [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:07:57 -0600; I have an OII that has been updated with V3.026 and so far have no issues, except... Now I notice that my SWR indication is off on 10 m. When I look into a dummy load, all bands save 10 m sees the SW; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00106.html (7,508 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:45:31 -0600; Note that this probably is NOT related to the V3 firmware -- I simply don't know why the SWR indication would be different on 10 m, but just dandy on 12 and all other bands. N5OP ____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00108.html (8,230 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:55:53 -0600; Does that mean that you see something strange, too? I'm on 3.026 with my O II and I can't believe this is a software issue unique to 10 m. I'm simply curious as to what it may be. The internal tuner; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00119.html (8,360 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:38:13 -0600; While I suppose that's a possibility, it makes no sense that this appears only on 10 m and not 12 m. Of course, the tuner can be bypassed -- doing so makes no difference. I bypassed the internal tune; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00124.html (8,807 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:24:50 -0600; I had noticed the dependence on power level before and thought it odd. I've also noticed that it didn't seem all that accurate compared to an independent meter. Is the reflectometer used for the inte; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00128.html (9,577 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] RX366 IF ouput TMP connector (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:02:49 -0600; There are many different connectors out there for various applications: BNC, TNC, SMA, SMB, NMO, T, C, N, B, SO-series, F-series, etc. The TMP connector is the miniature push-in connector all over th; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00175.html (8,737 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] RX366 IF ouput TMP connector (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:24:13 -0600; Aha! I couldn't figure out where the designation came from, I only knew what it was. And, I should have said "since 20-30 years agin" in my reply since they have become even more common since their i; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00180.html (12,616 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Extra...Extra... (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:47:02 -0600; Hot dog! Congratulations! Now, go use the dickens out of it! 73, Kim N5OP _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00263.html (8,267 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] Extra...Extra... (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:03:06 -0600; Oh, pshaw! This is a bit (OK, a lot) OT, but... While I love CW (part of what drew me to TenTec -- there, I worked TT into this) and CW constitutes about 99.9% of my on-the-air time, knowing CW doesn; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00279.html (10,705 bytes)
138. Re: [TenTec] Extra...Extra... (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:09:36 -0600; This is funny because the only time my wife requests I use headphones is when I use RTTY or one of the other digital modes, except for CW. The kids, on the other hand... Kim N5OP ____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00296.html (12,649 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Orion 565v1.373B vs. V565v3.030 (score: 1): Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:43:14 -0800 (PST); Note that you can try the new version and, if you don't like, it, easily revert back to your old version. In either case, you'll have to write down your settings so that you can reload them. That's t; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00539.html (8,401 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] adding xtal filter to the Orion (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:48:53 -0600; Now I'm puzzled. If the problem is noise/distortion from an offending transmitter, no amount of filtering in the rx will help that. If the transmitter is radiating in the rx pass and, the transmitter; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00617.html (8,577 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]