Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net: 405 ]

Total 405 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TenTec] TT Centurion (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
I discussion I saw said that the older, Eimac 3-500Z had zirconium in the anode and that when it was heated to at least a dull red, the zirconium becomes a getter. I don't know about newer tubes, or
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00249.html (10,310 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] TT Centurion (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:21:23 -0500
There's a good web page (among many) on getter material at http://www.thevalvepage.com/valvetek/getter/getter.htm The 3-500Z does use zirconium as a getter, and zirconium needs to be at about 1000 C
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00260.html (9,532 bytes)

343. [TenTec] FD & O-II (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:31:51 -0500
I took my O-II to FD and used it at the CW station. There were only two of us, but the other guy (who has an IC746) loved the O-II. Once i showed him how to set the AGC, he really liked it. For bette
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00499.html (7,925 bytes)

344. Re: [TenTec] Orion....use of 250 hz filter (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:57:01 -0500
I never knew this. My 566 is decked out with all the filters, but I did not know that the 566 dispensed with the extra IF amplifier stage for the 500 and 250 Hz filters. This is good to know, but how
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00329.html (8,674 bytes)

345. [TenTec] Foldback Protection in 565 and 566 PA? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
I was perusing my manual for my 566 again, and began to wonder if the PA has any SWR fold back protection. The manual says that the PA is good for 100 W into a 50 ohm load with up to 2:1 SWR, but nev
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00336.html (7,133 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:16:28 -0600
This is a great discussion. I truly appreciate Bob's latest entry. Some time ago on this list, someone posted a message that suggested using the menus to set the AGC threshold such that the S-meter d
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00023.html (12,904 bytes)

347. Re: [TenTec] O2_dreps_top_spot (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:13:12 -0600
Even so, the O II is still no slouch! When these sorts of levels are reached, I have to wonder of the differences are detectable by human operators? Is there a situation in which the O II operator wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00222.html (8,383 bytes)

348. [TenTec] Frequency Misalignment Between VFO A and VFO B (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:32:23 -0600
For some time, I've noticed what seemed to be a very slight frequency misalignment between VFO A and VFO B when in the binaural mode (A in one ear and B in the other). On my O II it's noticeable even
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00234.html (8,157 bytes)

349. [TenTec] AGC Threshold Increments (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:42:04 -0600
As I was adjusting the AGC for 80 m (noisy) I found that the increments of threshold adjustment get very coarse as the threshold is increased. For example, near the end of its range, it progresses (i
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00352.html (7,341 bytes)

350. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:09:27 -0600
This is a great write up and I'm grateful to you, Jerry, for taking the time to generate it. Now, while I've had my O II for over a year, circumstances have prevented me from using it as much as I'd
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00652.html (17,088 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] List Abbreviations (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:26:26 -0600
I'd like a copy of the list. There's another one that I've heard of before: the old Morse telegrapher's "is the wire (or frequency) busy?" which, I was told, is the old Morse "C" didit dit. I was tol
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00071.html (8,962 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] List Abbreviations (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:49:54 -0600
Great! My Dad, W5JHJ (SK) had told me about this shortly after I got my Novice ticket in 1970. I'd never heard or read of it anywhere. Now, the long comma -- that's a great one! I have my 2nd Class R
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00075.html (9,622 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner in O II? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:43:26 -0800 (PST)
I installed an OT-11P in my O II and it worked flawlessly. Alas, that one got hit by lightning and was deemed unrepairable. It stall had that tuner in it, but I have no idea if it workes or not. Insu
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00723.html (10,448 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuner in O II? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 07:46:28 -0800 (PST)
That's an interesting way to go about using the tuner, one I never tried and I must admit it's a good idea. I found that, without this step, the LDG tuner -- and the fact that it was a bit less expen
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00726.html (13,807 bytes)

355. Re: [TenTec] O II and 3rd party ATU? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:43:45 -0600
Not true: I added an LDG tuner to my first OII. Alas, that one was struck by lightning and I doubt that anything in it is reliable anymore. Kim Elmore, N5OP If I remember reading about the Orion II,
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00265.html (9,278 bytes)

356. [TenTec] What Am I Missing? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:10:53 -0500
OK, I'm now thoroughly confused. I have finally recovered (I think) from a lightning strike I experienced earlier this summer. It took out my O II, computer, antenna switch and the balun on my 80 m v
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00071.html (8,833 bytes)

357. [TenTec] Additional Info on "What Am I Missing?" (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:52:14 -0500
I should have added that I'm using Ham Radio Deluxe v3.4. Dunno if that matters or not... Kim Elmore, N5OP
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00083.html (6,897 bytes)

358. [TenTec] Out of Ham Band VFO A with O II (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:05:42 -0500
I guess this capability must be common knowledge and I simply missed it. Besides Ham Radio Deluxe, does the N4PY software enable this as well? Kim Elmore, N5OP
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00126.html (7,052 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] Adding antenna tuner to Orion II later (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:37:20 -0500
I wonder why? I added the LDG OT-11P tuner to an Orion II and it was straightforward. I still have that tuner, BTW, in an O II that got damaged by lightning. I'm not sure how to check the tuner to se
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00176.html (12,115 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] controlling more than one ten tec radio with one computer (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:50:43 -0500
As long as COM port assignments remain unique, there shouldn't be any problem running multiple radios from a single computer. You will have problems if more than one application tries to run the same
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00316.html (11,701 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu