- 141. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 Logic Board Failure (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
- Good luck with it and keep us posted Dave WA3F Dave, I agree with you. I could have insisted they troubleshoot the problem further, but of course that is at my expense, and most likely will have the
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00376.html (16,199 bytes)
- 142. Re: [TenTec] Was I bad??? (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:03:53 +0000 (UTC)
- Bob, By all means grab one of the 715's. I ran 2 OMNI VI+'s barefoot into a 160M dipole at about 60 ft. Seldom used SSB, but when I did, I got walked over. TenTec had a reduced price on a demo unit (
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00554.html (12,044 bytes)
- 143. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
- If you do any CW, you'll want the 500Hz & 300 Hz filters. They work well on digital, also unless you want a waterfall with wider bandpass. I'm not a great fan of internal tuners. The used VII I found
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00581.html (8,965 bytes)
- 144. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
- Terry, I'm glad it's not just me. The remote tuning knob is the single reason that my next rig will be an Omni VII, rather than an Eagle. Seems trite, but my rigs are on a shelf, 8" above the desk to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00093.html (10,398 bytes)
- 145. Re: [TenTec] Computer Interface (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC)
- Yep, he's right. After too many ye3ars with an interface, this works best. Many programs will do the job. I like N1MM Dave WA3F I have an old OMNI VI and would like to interface a computer logging pr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00124.html (8,947 bytes)
- 146. Re: [TenTec] Speech to Text (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
- John, You may want to google 'speech to text' I came up with the following URL http://www.nuance.com/talk/ Good luck with the project. Let us know when you have it working or keep us posted as you pr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00147.html (9,411 bytes)
- 147. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
- Thank you. Very well said. We all care about the performance, but the ergonomics and 'feel' of a rig are what counts for most of us. Therefore, personal opinions do matter Dave WA3F Yeah, really! her
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00180.html (10,693 bytes)
- 148. Re: [TenTec] This reflector is flooding my inbox with totally NON TEN TEC chatter! (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
- Thanks, Ken. The moderator of this reflector deserves a great deal of thanks from a lot of us. When my delete key wore out (hi) I just started to use the mouse to point to delete. I have personally l
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00287.html (12,827 bytes)
- 149. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
- Tough decision, Frank, I have a used Omni VII on the way. It won because: 1) I gotta have the remote tuning pad. I've got them on my Omni VI+'s and love them. With keypad and 3 function keys, it's a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00474.html (10,681 bytes)
- 150. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:01:44 +0000 (UTC)
- Yes, but that is for either a straight key or a keyer output. I want to use the internal keyer and that is not supported on the rear. Thanks, however, for the time and attention to my issue. That is
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00477.html (13,361 bytes)
- 151. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:46:35 +0000 (UTC)
- Once again, the point is missed. There is a lead on the accessory jack if I wanted to just use a straight key or an external keyer. We covered that earlier. Let me try this again: I WOULD LIKE TO USE
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00500.html (11,326 bytes)
- 152. Re: [TenTec] Titan vac relay (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
- To the whole crew who spent a lot of their dollars, time and hard work, Thanks for providing the new on so many bands and modes Merry Christmas Happy New Year Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00503.html (8,669 bytes)
- 153. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:24:53 +0000 (UTC)
- No, you didn't miss a thing. My original point was that: 1) My Omni VI+'s have a 1/8" jack on the rear panel that supports the internal keyer with the paddle of your choice 2) The Eagle has a 1/8" ja
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00506.html (12,339 bytes)
- 154. [TenTec] Omni VII Serial Port (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:52:55 +0000 (UTC)
- Just got an Omni VII today. Trying to get it to talk to N1MM or vice versa. Nothing in manual on serial port parameters to set in N1MM and I haven't found anywhere I can set them in the Omni VII Anyb
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00510.html (7,373 bytes)
- 155. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Serial Port (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:51:32 +0000 (UTC)
- Carl, Thanks very much. It's working as it should. I had run just TXD, RXD & Signal Ground as used by the Omni VI and completely overlooked handshaking. So, I added 2 wires to the cable and turned on
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00512.html (9,330 bytes)
- 156. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII & MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:04:04 +0000 (UTC)
- Got mine on Christmas Eve. Once the comm was set up and N1MM was working, all I did was plug in a TT 712 interface cable and go to the digital screen on N1MM. MMTTY came up and worked fine. Of course
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00539.html (8,374 bytes)
- 157. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII & MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:37:21 +0000 (UTC)
- Gary, You'll have to set the serial port to: 57,600 baud 8-bits no parity RTS/CTS signaling You'll have to pass: tmt data rcv data sig grd rts cts If you're 9-pin connectors on both ends, that's stra
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00542.html (9,985 bytes)
- 158. Re: [TenTec] What Model Ten-Tec Rig Do I Need ? (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
- Yes, all the current TenTec stuff has the classic TenTec QSK. So, any TenTec rig will work CW as you want. I have found that the 'phone stuff' is not a burden to the CW side of operation. CW is also
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00001.html (12,752 bytes)
- 159. Re: [TenTec] What Model Ten-Tec Rig Do I Need ? (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:20:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Rick, As a point of clarification, if I were buying a contest rig, it wouldn't be another Omni VI+, it would be an Orion II, or similar rig. I was thinking of the dual receive, dual antenna, etc. I c
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00003.html (10,208 bytes)
- 160. Re: [TenTec] What_Model_Ten-Tec_Rig_Do_I_Need_? (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:11:58 +0000 (UTC)
- John, In a couple of weeks, please follow up and let us know your thoughts on this setup for your purposes Tnx Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "John Westerlage" <john@n5dwi.com> To: "Discussio
- /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00035.html (9,883 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu