Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:d.e.warnick@comcast.net: 350 ]

Total 350 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] 610 Has started shipping today (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
No, it's no where to be found there Dave WA3MKB Dave, have you found it on TT's web site...I have not??? 73, Lee, KC9CDT --Original Message-- From: d.e.warnick@comcast.net To: Discussion of Ten-Tec E
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-08/msg00263.html (13,350 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] 715 question (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:19:36 +0000 (UTC)
Works great with my Omni VI+ and Herc II amp. There's no reason that the RF cannot be amplified just because it has a higher 'average' power. After all, amps were used with the internal processor in
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00090.html (13,041 bytes)

163. Re: [TenTec] Two new accessories (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
I still want a Hercules III 1.5KW SSB, 1 KW CW & Digital Soliid State No Tune Follows the rig band to band Love My Herc II. Just want more watts -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comc
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-09/msg00220.html (8,511 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] CW filter for Omni-VI+.... What model? 250Hz, 9MHz... LOW TONE CW!?? (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
You might also want to look into the InRad #753. It's for a lower tone CW, but is 400 Hz wide Dave WA3MKB Jerry, Its a 221. Had to find anymore. I'm looking for one myself. 73, Charlie, K4ZRJ _______
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00083.html (9,070 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] CW filter for Omni-VI+.... What model? 250Hz, 9MHz... LOW TONE CW!?? (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:32:12 +0000 (UTC)
Just knowing the value of the capacitors is not enough. That would assume that identical crystals were used in both the high-tone and the low-tone filters. We cannot make that assumption. Therefore,
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00101.html (12,463 bytes)

166. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo gear list October 9, 2009 (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:39:47 +0000 (UTC)
I'll be there, too, Ron; from Dauphin county with an Omni VI+ (it is a model 564, so it's OK to call it a plus) and a Hercules II. I hope I'm not out of line to call it a High-Power entry (after all,
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00102.html (10,374 bytes)

167. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo gear list October 9, 2009 (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Don't see you in the log, Ron. I got called away, so very low hours. Hung  out on 20M too long, but I only need Delaware on 20 for 5BWAS, so hoped to get a short skip there. No such luck. When I got
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00113.html (12,877 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] WTB: 302R Remote Tuning Pod for Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:02:55 +0000 (UTC)
I've got a 302R that I picked up used in anticipation of getting an Omni VII. My 302 has the identical knob to my OPmni VI+'s and the friction adjustment works the same. Dave WA3MKB There is a simple
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00187.html (9,778 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II drive requirement (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:24:46 +0000 (UTC)
I get the same resuolts as Ken. My Omni VI+ drives my Herc II to full output at about 35 watts output. Now we'll have to listen to all the complaints that TenTec watts are less than the competitions
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00113.html (10,632 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates.... (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:17:00 +0000 (UTC)
Jerry, Well said. Thank you for stating what I believe is the frustration of the 'silent majority' on this reflector with the vocal few. Dave WA3MKB I come to the Ten-Tec Reflectors for information a
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00128.html (10,738 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] It the 715 speech processor for my Omni C? (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:32:02 +0000 (UTC)
You'll love the 715 with an Omni C. Dave WA3MKB I have been looking at the TenTec 715 speech processor on the Ten Tec web site and now saw a review on it in the latest QST.  From what I read it would
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00141.html (8,583 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] Updated "FIX IT" list for Orion II v. 2.041XL (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:11:59 +0000 (UTC)
 I hardly think that TenTec can  be considered 'has been' by even the wildest stretch of an imagination. With 3 very solid transcievers (Jupiter, Omni VII & Orion II) and great accessories such as th
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00234.html (10,241 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
With a budget in the $600 to $1800 range, you can do quite well in  a TT rig, Please understand that because of the way the protective circuitry in TT rigs is set up, it is best to run with a TT powe
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00039.html (12,051 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] Titan III 417A...... (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:04:56 +0000 (UTC)
John, TenTec has a used one for $3495. Of course, that includes return policy and a warranty, so the fair value would be something less than that. Dave WA3MKB Hello Folks..... What is a fair market p
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00176.html (8,008 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] Reflector Problems (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
Yes, I deleted an e-mail from her also. Said she got the info from this site Dave WA3MKB Hello I have not been receiving much mail from this, and other reflectors to which I subscribe. I tried contac
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00182.html (8,303 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] soldering pl259 (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:52:06 +0000 (UTC)
OK, so I 'googled' Farnell 1169747. Got lots of hits on that. hERE ARE SOME OF THE url'S http://uk.farnell.com/multicomp/mc17-01b-5/plug-uhf-large-cable-entry-rg213/dp/1169714 http://www.farnell.com/
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00185.html (8,933 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] soldering pl259 (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC)
I just checked Amphenol web sites. They make a compression UHF connector, but only in the smaller RG-58 size. If you want a UHF for RG-213 the only thing they offer is a crimp connector. In any of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00186.html (10,099 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] Buying on EBay (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
As for PayPal, it is very convenient and works well Now about buying on eBay. You have no more idea about the rig you are buying than any other one you don't see. qth.com and the other sites are no d
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00396.html (10,932 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI cw signals (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 13:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
I have 2 Omni VI+ and have had 3 Omni VI Opt3, and I have never had a report that the keying is anything but excellent. Yes, I have used external keyers, but presently use only the built-in keyer in
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00123.html (7,989 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] wither CW? (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 00:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
Different strokes for different folks. Each must live by his/her own standards. I choose to not use a cluster or CW copying software. The technology is there if I want it. The choice is mine. Then ag
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00309.html (15,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu