- 261. Re: [TenTec] Inrad SSB filter for Omni VI (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:29:19 +0000 (UTC)
- Paul, I've done that mod on both of my Omni VI+'s & it has abssolutely no effect on CW which is my primary mode of operation. Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "Paul DeWitte" <k9ot@yousq.net> To
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-03/msg00283.html (7,753 bytes)
- 262. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Model 236 Remote Control Cable (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:59:00 +0000 (UTC)
- Gary, The cable assembly arrived in Saturday's mail. Thanks very much. My check for $35 will go out in this afternoon's mail. Have a great week 73 Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "Gary H. Harm
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00209.html (8,367 bytes)
- 263. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus DC Input Issue (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
- If you're making th e power connections to the same place on the Pegasus (I assume you are), then you need to get the ol' voltmeter out & see where you do & do not have 12 volts. I'd start at the spo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00356.html (10,567 bytes)
- 264. [TenTec] ORION II FSK (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 14:20:20 +0000 (UTC)
- I'm setting up RTTY on my Orion II On my Omni VII, I use FSK via the factory-supplied cable as the red jack connects to pin 5 of the DIN plug, where FSK is On the Orion II, the FSK connection is to p
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00053.html (7,632 bytes)
- 265. Re: [TenTec] ORION II FSK (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 03:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
- Thanks, Kim. That's what I thought you had. Unfortunately, they have discontinued it, so I cut the connector off a factory cable & soldered an 8-pin DIN plug on it. I do appreciate your help & quick
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00056.html (10,743 bytes)
- 266. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:36:06 +0000 (UTC)
- There are currently emission standards, etc. that need to be met to gain FCC type acceptance. If the current crop of transceivers meet these specifications & there is still a problem, then the specif
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00091.html (14,463 bytes)
- 267. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:56:30 +0000 (UTC)
- Definitely read the tutorial. Then put it into practice. It's a lot to absorb and will take me years to do so, but it's right on. Yep, some of my audio is now on twisted pairs without shields & sure
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00106.html (14,751 bytes)
- 268. Re: [TenTec] Foot in my mouth... (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 12:20:06 +0000 (UTC)
- Excellent post. This is what I meant when I said that if the current specifications are not doing the job, then a thorough review of them may be in order. Don't beat yourself up or apologiz e for thi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00138.html (12,399 bytes)
- 269. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Filters (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 15:54:24 +0000 (UTC)
- I agree, Rick. I have both the Orion II & the Omni VII. The Omni is a very intuitive rig to operate. Plug it in & use it. The Orion II is a wonderful rig. I use it daily, and the Omni gets very littl
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00177.html (12,032 bytes)
- 270. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
- I can't help myself. I've got to reply. Billy, everything that you point out is correct & is necessary to understand if one is to maximize his/her antenna system. However, you have ignored Rick's pre
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00240.html (26,648 bytes)
- 271. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
- Thanks, Bob. I have been building my own feed line for years. Several years ago, you commented on my then Palstar AT5K & the advantage of the Measures tuners. You also sent photos of your choke balun
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00249.html (9,001 bytes)
- 272. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:20:39 +0000 (UTC)
- The tower itself should be well grounded. The following url http://www.3starinc.com/rohn_r-bgk2ggx_tower_base_ground_kit.html shows Rohn's suggestion with excellent information. Their kit lists at $1
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00293.html (16,479 bytes)
- 273. Re: [TenTec] OT: CQ WPX Contest (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 22:15:28 +0000 (UTC)
- After the contest, please tell us about the antenna 73 CU in the test Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: "TenTec Eagle" <TenTec_Eagle@yahoogroups.com>,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00336.html (8,802 bytes)
- 274. Re: [TenTec] OT: Looking for good starter HF transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:17:14 +0000 (UTC)
- Rick, As you are well aware, with a budget of $500, your friend should only spend about $300 to $350 on the rig. That leaves some cash for the antenna (a $10,000 budget would be nice for that & I kno
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00387.html (12,458 bytes)
- 275. Re: [TenTec] 40m BCI and Ten-Tec vs. Elecraft (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:07:18 +0000 (UTC)
- Well said, Wade. I can't wait for the bands to open up a bit so this endless whining will stop 73 Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "wade staggs" <tvman1954@gmail.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00477.html (15,043 bytes)
- 276. Re: [TenTec] Wire Gauge Table (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
- Count the ads that you see for a mic that's wired for a particular radio. That'll tell you where we are technically any more. And, that's only 2 to 4 loeads soldered to a connector. On the other hand
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00513.html (10,573 bytes)
- 277. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:45:27 +0000 (UTC)
- I agree with Jack. I've been on this reflector for several years, and have deleted literally hundreds of complaints about software updates. During that time, I have been able to log thousands of cont
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00076.html (10,281 bytes)
- 278. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:41:07 +0000 (UTC)
- Why don't we all just sit back and see what happens? The consumer will make the decision IMHO $800 is just crazy to pay for a 100w amp. I can hear the naysayers already and how other companies offer
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00165.html (8,093 bytes)
- 279. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:15:35 +0000 (UTC)
- Pleas e excuse my ignorance. I have used both methods of keying, but have never run a TenTec rig without the amp keying the transmitter. I understand that my xcvr will key the amp & that there needs
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00213.html (10,765 bytes)
- 280. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1)
- Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:31:25 +0000 (UTC)
- Thanks Rick. Now I'll print your reply and study it with both manuals 73 Dave WA3F -- Original Message -- From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@co
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00217.html (12,735 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu