Mail Archive Search: <+from:darwin@together.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:darwin@together.net: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni C ? (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:55:40 -0400; The Omni C is the last of the original Omni series. It was available as a digital readout rig only so TenTec dropped the "D" designation. It is considered to be the best of the first Omni series, hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-04/msg00226.html (7,282 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Electret Mic voltage vs. Dynamic Mic (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:23:13 -0400; -- to get capacitor, or I don't know how it is with "ham" mics, but dynamic mics used for live music / PA purposes (Shure SM58, SM57, etc.) are transformer coupled so they are uneffected by these DC; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-04/msg00255.html (8,070 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:48:34 -0500; -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> Good thought. It reminded me of an in-line volume control I had for my headphones. I dug it up and put it in, and all is better now. By running the AF gain higher, the; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00054.html (8,154 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni C / Corsair Hssssss. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:58:53 -0500; -- *snip* clean 6 Ah, there we go. All this time I'm thinking about my home stereo system with its 90dB S/N ratio. Why can't a rather simple receiver design accomplish the same thing? Yea, I know we'; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00055.html (9,168 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 23:08:39 -0500; Why yes, Gene, your old '930 is the one I tested. You too, decided the TenTec was a more desirable rig? Cool. -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> *snip* had -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00077.html (8,624 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni C AGC problem after mod. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:52:01 -0500; I modified the AGC circuit in my Omni C to speed up the AGC on RX. I replaced the 4.7 uF cap with a 1 uF. I then wired another 3.3 uF cap in parallel through the Fast / Slow switch. The mod works wel; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00279.html (7,610 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni C AGC problem after mod. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:00:33 -0500; -- <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> you But move. Oops, let me clarify the mod I did. Yes, I replaced C22 with a 1uF cap. I reused the QSK switch by disconnecting the wire from the; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00282.html (10,415 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Omni C AGC problem after mod. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:34:33 -0500; Hi Ed, Well, the mod sure made those fluttery CW stations easier to copy. I don't loose dits or dahs during rapid QSB conditions. So I think it was worth it, but I'm having problems with the receiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00326.html (8,323 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Omni C AGC problem after mod. PROB FOUND! (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:45:24 -0500; y'all remember my problem. I modified the AGC to give a fast recovery for fluttery CW stuff. I unhooked the QSK fast/slow switch and wired that to the AGC mod to allow me to switch between fast and s; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00327.html (7,762 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Rigs I USED-TO have (was FS: Argonaut 515, P/S and Filters) (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 18:57:03 -0500; Oooo, is this tempting ... I bought a used 515 in 1984 or 85. Rig, PS, filter, calibrator (?), all in mint condition for $325 (I think). I used it as an only rig for a year or so and then sold it. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00106.html (8,063 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Omni D during contest. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 20:18:28 -0500; Well, actually Roy, I kinda wish I wasn't enjoying it as much. I bought the Omni D cheap and took a risk that it might have some problems. It did. The VFO needed rebuilding, panel lamps were out, the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00003.html (8,007 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Audio AGC (was Omni D during contest.) (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 20:10:16 -0500; I didn't like the AGC action in my first several TT rigs. But after getting used to it, I find it does have some definite advantages. I'm especially fond of the way the audio filters affect the ACG.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00004.html (7,825 bytes)
13. [TenTec] FS: TT 1.8 KHz filter, 9 MHz (#218?) (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 07:05:59 -0500; For Sale: TenTec narrow SSB filter for the 9MHz position. Works fine, currently in use. $58 shipped within the 48 states. I don't quite remember the model number and am too lazy to open the rig up to; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00233.html (6,927 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Sliding Resonate ctrl on Omni D? (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:10:07 -0500; I know this has been solved on this reflector, but I didn't have the problem back then :) Now I do so I'd appreciate it if someone would clue me in. The resonate control on my Omni D doesn't stay put; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00480.html (6,988 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Speakers (was Pegasus speaker output) (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 07:14:49 -0500; I'm using the 2 speakers I got with my Soundblaster kit. They're small and don't mess up the VFO if I set them on the rig. They certainly sound better than the internal speaker. Having 2 speakers is; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00539.html (7,845 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Omni D during contest. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 20:52:51 -0500; During the recent CW DX contest, I was very pleased how well my Omni D handled the bands. I could hear the weak ones next to the strong ones. Overall, the band just seemed ... clean. You know, signal; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00553.html (7,469 bytes)
17. [TenTec] FS: TT #218 filter (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 20:48:43 -0500; For Sale: TenTec #218 narrow SSB filter for the 9MHz IF. Works fine, currently in use. Useful as a "wide CW" filter for band scanning with less noise. $58 shipped within the 48 states. Keith Darwin K; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00554.html (6,757 bytes)
18. [TenTec] High Z vs. Low Z mics (Omni C). (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 21:05:41 -0400; Howdy y'all, Well, I'm back on the air after 4 months QRT. I sold my Corsair II back then and just now got an Omni C to replace it. The Omni is in kind of rough shape but I got it cheap so it's to be; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00079.html (7,444 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Sticky VFO. (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 21:07:14 -0400; My new Omni C has VFO problems. I turn the knob but the VFO doesn't always move. I assume this is that TenTec VFO problem y'all have posted about so often. Until now, I simply ignored all those posts; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00080.html (7,021 bytes)
20. [TenTec] High Z vs. Low Z mics (Omni C). (score: 1): Author: darwin@together.net (K & H Darwin); Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:51:52 -0400; Well, I ordered the PTO rebuild kit from TenTec. $20. I also ordered a xtal for 12 m operation $25 Ouch! Not only do I have a 200 ohm mic, but I have an RS low-z to high-z transformer as well. I thin; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00114.html (7,955 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]