Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:douglas.shock@gmail.com: 163 ]

Total 163 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] v2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:47:04 -0600
Huge change with the required Mic Gain. Also looks the the speach proc can be cranked up now. I do notice that if the mic gain is setup a bit hot and the tx EX goes above 9 then I start getting poppi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00758.html (6,921 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:16:06 -0600
Anyone else get popping and cranking on recieve if the recieve EQ is set above 3? Same thing on the TX audio if the eq is set above 3 Is it me or did they decrease the af levels? Seems like I have to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00759.html (7,858 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:04:13 -0600
the raspy audio on the + EQ adjust on TX or RX only occurs through the headphones. The decreased audio seems to be a function of the changes in the rec. EQ. If I adjust the RCV EQ to a pos value, the
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00760.html (7,973 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Fw: FS: Ten Tec 238 antenna tuner... (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:16:29 -0600
I'll change headphones tonight and see what happens. I switched back to 2.032 and no problems in this area. Wonder what changed.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00765.html (8,563 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:26:57 -0600
Great explanation. and, I'll bet the static and popping I am hearing is the result of my CHEAPER headphones being over driven. So what is recommended on headphones with the Orion II?
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00770.html (12,909 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:06:23 -0600
Better headphones, or different anyway, cured the snap and crack in the audio.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00777.html (8,726 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] 2.033 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:11:20 -0600
sope to soon. Still a problem just not near as bad. I am using my heil pro headset now. hummmmm...turned into dits and bit so we will see.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00779.html (9,142 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR 1k (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:11:25 -0600
John, I don't see this as an insult. And I think a bunch here have been saying the same thing for months. Great radio...just need better skills for the software. Do a search and see how many times yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00828.html (10,118 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? PRO III or Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:23:31 -0700
I have operated the 1000d/1000mp/1000mp MV and the filed for over 12 years. Your comments are confusing becuase hands down, the Orion 1 / II are far better in everyway. Being that I have operated/con
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00081.html (8,953 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:01:41 -0700
John, what do you have your Mic gain set at with the pr40? Doug / K0ZU
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00101.html (10,003 bytes)

131. [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:13:57 -0700
Anyone other than myself notice the significant distortion of the audio, ssb and CW, when the nr is engaged at either 1 all the way to 9? Another observation is that the volume levals are off now. 1/
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00143.html (8,269 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:32:23 -0700
Well, I am not sure Don. I liked the idea of the hung picel going away or atleast that it isn;t a hardware issue. The sweep does appear to be better at indicating signal location...still a bit off th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00152.html (11,011 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:41:18 -0700
I reported it already. I know they are trying and I think they are doing a fantastic job. It might be time for a beta test group effort so that these threads don't hurt the positives of this radio. B
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00155.html (10,658 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:42:38 -0700
I am kinda guessing a few things didn't get listed...wink wink!
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00161.html (9,368 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:02:08 -0700
It's time to bring Doug back for a short blip.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00174.html (9,635 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:12:34 -0700
I will say in defense of the NR on v2.031, there is a substantial difference in the noise floor between the settings 1 through 9. The noise almost disappears at 9. However, the artifacts in the recei
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00176.html (10,117 bytes)

137. [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR distortion (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:48:54 -0700
It apears that the NR does infact work better in 2.031 based on my comparisons to 2.030. It is much more aggresive. The disortion appears to become a factor only when the RF gain is adjusted to below
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00240.html (7,040 bytes)

138. [TenTec] Orion II NR with 2.031 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:33:06 -0700
Well, I have spent the last 4 hours working with release 2.031 and my impressions are far different of the NR capability than when it first came out. My receive antenna is a rain gutter. The band of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00276.html (9,234 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Heil PSQP and Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:45:26 -0700
The one used for Yaesu
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00293.html (7,778 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Orion II NR with 2.031 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:07:31 -0700
Henrick, The answer to your question is yes I do. I have tried to determine a pattern that causes the distortion but this is a hard one. It appears to change per band. The RF gain affects it, the # o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00359.html (12,541 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu