Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:douglas.shock@gmail.com: 163 ]

Total 163 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Anyone try a 1.8 roofing filter in the Orion? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:45:54 -0700
well, maybe we can trade Kelly our services: all the orion owners here take care of his qsl card stuff and he jumps on Mr. Robbins for a SW update for us?
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00395.html (10,582 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] While we're on the subject of 1208 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:50:11 -0600
And while we have your attention Scott... What is the latest plan on development with the Orion II? We haven't seen a software release addressing some of the "still needs some work " areas for many m
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00195.html (10,473 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] While we're on the subject of 1208 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:28:26 -0600
Excellent feedback Scott and a huge thanks for your input! Much appreciated!
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00200.html (10,083 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] K4VUD & Titan 425 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:35:45 -0600
nope
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00471.html (10,688 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] K4VUD & Titan 425 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:17:57 -0600
Here's some better icing on the cake. When I called to discuss NR concerns on my Orion II some time ago I was told there were no issues. My comment then was why were so many people on the tentec refl
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00480.html (11,465 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] K4VUD & Titan 425 (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:59:23 -0600
and this is why I just keep to myself!
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00482.html (13,981 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] So Long (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:19:33 -0600
well stated!
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00506.html (7,993 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:27:16 -0600
I would agree...and thinking about selling my Orion II for the K3. Elecraft has done nothing short od impress me with customer service and support. I just wandered over to www.Elecraft.com and saw th
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00011.html (8,952 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] Stacking registers (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 14:50:36 -0600
no they don't Hi all, I just had an e-mail from Gary at T-T in response to my ditsnbits note. He said that a fix to the stacking-register problem is in the works and should be released next week. T-T
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00108.html (7,635 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sub receiver question (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:46:34 -0600
I noticed the same exact thing a few months ago. It seems very worng to me as well. I did not send anything into dit n bits. When working DX split and I turn the volume on the sub receiver the main r
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00051.html (9,130 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware update...how soon? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 17:19:16 -0600
Grant, the NR on my 1000mp smokes the Orion II in every sense. The NR on my TS-2000 smokes the NR on the Orion II again in every sense. The bottom line is I don't care how tentec does it...but at lea
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00077.html (9,998 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware update...how soon? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:28:26 -0600
you obviously don't do weak signal cw work then or you would understand what the issues are. I would agree with you John that the NR does work...but when dealing with huge signals to begin with. I ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00091.html (10,870 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware update...how soon? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:05:35 -0600
Hey Grnt, I would be more than happy to send both radios to you! I am not suggesting that either radio can create something from nothing. What I am stating as "fact" is that both my other radios have
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00095.html (10,764 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware update...how soon? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:21:08 -0600
and, as an afterthought...I am glad you are still on the wagon for getting TenTec to step up and finish the job. A working s-meter would be nice as well...you listening Scott? As an afterthought, I'l
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00096.html (10,299 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware update...how soon? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:03:57 -0600
To your point John, the NR is wonderful for strong signals and more often than not, I will make use of it particularly on the low bands. So your observations are valid. Thanks for not taking offence
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00109.html (12,926 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] FYI - New Omin VII firmware released (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:12:53 -0600
hahahahaha...my fantasy is to just see a release for Right. The question I have is whether we'll see parallel versions of each new v2 release for the Orion I and II. I would hope so. Time will tell.
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00253.html (9,424 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Orion Ergonomics, Key Clicks, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:50:59 -0700
I suspect Scott Robbins feels these changes aren't need and we as owners have it all wrong. I have been complaining of the completely absurd settings when clicking on a packet spot. It's a crap shoot
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00216.html (9,373 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] Wow! (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:54:49 -0600
I would agree that the process of setting up LOTW is rather cumbersome and I work in the industry so I am not a stranger to any of this weird science. I for one am very disappointed on my return rat
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00339.html (12,682 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Orion Noise Reduction Ability (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:09:13 -0600
interesting idea A "trick" under uncrowded band conditions that sometimes makes the DSP NB very effective is to force the main rx roofing filters to 6 or 15 Khz - then try the DSP NB. I stumbled into
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00496.html (12,753 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Orion I and II on E? (score: 1)
Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:17:27 -0700
Me too. My posts never go through Oops, I guess my probation has been canceled. This post showed up immediately. I wish I had know that. I'd pretty much stopped posting to the list. 73, Mark ________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00612.html (10,181 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu