Mail Archive Search: <+from:g.bold@auckland.ac.nz>

Results:

References: [ +from:g.bold@auckland.ac.nz: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 2A GA Omni A, Omni D at w4rrw (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary Bold); Date: Tue Jul 1 05:49:35 2003; Hi Jules and others, I think that you are describing the low-pass "LCL" tee, which also works, and I have used this too. Nice features are: It IS a low-pass network, requires only ONE capacitor, and; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00002.html (9,540 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 2A GA Omni A, Omni D at w4rrw (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary Bold); Date: Mon Jun 30 17:37:36 2003; Bob, both my MFJ tee tuners eat watts, because the coil sits too close to the metal case, which gets warm. I've replaced the case top with cardboard, which increases the Q and decreases the losses. S; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00000.html (9,335 bytes)
3. [TenTec] 2A GA Omni A, Omni D at w4rrw (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary Bold); Date: Mon Jun 30 18:33:11 2003; Hi Bob, yes, most people seem to prefer the SPC these days, although I have gone back to the simple tee because of the slightly better power efficiency, given the same components. I discovered the MF; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00001.html (11,449 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Re: Radio Shack 25 amp switching supply? (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary Bold); Date: Mon Mar 10 20:28:03 2003; Hi all, Re switchers: I bought the SAMLEX 1223 as reviewed in QST. I've been impressed. Here in ZL I operate portable at Christmas at a beach location well away from cities. The noise floor is so low; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00449.html (7,364 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OT - CW keyboards (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:10:31 +1200; Al, Re keyboards: I was a beta-tester for the K20, and reviewed it in my column in the NZART journal "Break-In". I liked it. I can send you the review text if you want it. Gary ZL1AN -- FAQ on WWW: h; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00224.html (7,515 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Fast paddling (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 15:33:16 +1300; Hi all, Re high-speed paddle sending: I tried for some years to send at 40 wpm using my (iambic, Brown Brothers) paddle and found that while I could send CHARACTERS at this speed, I could not send co; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00057.html (8,256 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Copying in your head etc. (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 04:05:36 +1200; Hi all, re the thread concerning "copying in your head": About August 1997, Tom W4BQF posted a comment on this reflector about increasing reading speed. He advocated the use of a software or hardware; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00470.html (7,871 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Paddles? (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:47:03 +1200; Hi all, I heard a rumour that somebody had bought up the dies used to produce the Brown Brothers paddles of yesteryear, and planned to produce them again. Is this true? If so, who is producing them?; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00151.html (6,903 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Keyer chips (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 15:44:21 +1200; Hi all, besides the keyers mentioned, check out the K9 and K10 keyer kits from Steve, K1EL. Website is http://members.aol.com/k1el/index.html The K9 gets customized with your callsign, and some other; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00245.html (7,027 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Kachina comparison? (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 14:30:39 +1300; Hi all, I've been asked to review a Kachina 505DSP transceiver for the ZL Ham journal "Break-In". Two questions: I have bad power-line noise at my QTH. Can anyone comment on the relative receiver per; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00016.html (8,358 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Kachina review (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 10:41:01 +1300; Re: Kachina review: Thanks to all who offered useful information after my earlier post, and I certainly did not intend to trigger a discussion about the merits of computers that look like radios. My; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00042.html (7,485 bytes)
12. [TenTec] RE: Equipment recomendations for CW gear? (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:01:21 +1300; Tom, re your request for help on CW keyers: Check out the K9 keyer at http://members.aol.com/k1el/ If you can solder together a simple circuit with an 8 pin DIP chip in it and a handful of other comp; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00270.html (9,111 bytes)
13. [TenTec] coax keying leads (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 12:04:15 +1200; Hi all, A Ham new to CW asked me this question: "Should I use coax to connect the key to the rig, or between the paddles, keyer and rig? Some people say it's a necessity, others say it doesn't matter; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-08/msg00127.html (7,535 bytes)
14. No subject (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 10:40:31 +1200; Hi all, re Jim's question about transmatches, and Scott's reply: Scott correctly states that an L configuration gives the minimum loss, and highest bandwidth matching network. If two resistances R1 a; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00116.html (10,242 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Tuners and matching (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 14:38:16 +1200; Apologies to everyone who has emailed me about my earlier posting re "L" and "tee" types. I've been inundated with responses and requests for software. I'm working a list, replying individually, but; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00130.html (6,948 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Paddles (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:54:56 +1200; Hi all, I write the "Morseman" column in the NZART (New Zealand) Ham journal "Break-In". Recently, ZLs have been contacting me to find out where they can buy keyer paddles. I found out, to my surpris; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00322.html (7,928 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Estimating receiver passband responses. (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:29:43 +1300; Hi All, I write the morse column in the NZART Journal "Break-In". Recently, I've been comparing and publishing the passband responses of various commercial transceivers. I do this by 1. tuning the re; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00034.html (8,959 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Re: Estmating passband responses. (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:51:58 +1300; Hi all, re measuring passbands: Jay is quite right: Using a different setup (microphone, speaker) doesn't allow a valid comparison of results obtained by different people. But the differences are not; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00045.html (9,045 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Re: Estimating passband responses. (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 15:03:27 +1300; --==_876433481==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi all, For those who have told me they're interested, I've attached a PostScript file showing the "narrow CW" responses of two ICOM IC7; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00046.html (16,380 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Passband responses; apology (score: 1): Author: g.bold@auckland.ac.nz (Gary E. J. Bold); Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 17:47:32 +1300; Hi all, I have been informed that indeed it IS poor practice to mail attachments to this reflector. I apologise profusely. I won't do it again. I guess I mail results of experiments like this all the; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00047.html (6,999 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]