Mail Archive Search: <+from:g4bjm@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:g4bjm@hotmail.com: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] test, please ignore (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:12:16 +0000; test _________________________________________________________________ http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl0010000002ukm/direct/01/; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00097.html (7,328 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OT 75 Ohm twin feeder (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:43:59 +0000; Hi Steve et al. Some years ago I put up horizontal parallel dipoles for 20/15/10m and wanted to feed them with heavy duty 75R twin feeder to avoid the weight of a centre balun and coax. Westlake no l; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00356.html (10,538 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OT 75 Ohm twin feeder (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:54:36 +0000; Thanks all for the interesting comments re wet twin feeder. Come to think of it, our club has an 80m doublet fed with 200' of 450R slotted line, and that needs re-matching when it's wet. The 20/15/10; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00376.html (11,782 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus audio (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:49:44 +0000; Our club's Omni6+ option3 sounds very different on USB and LSB, and it's not possible to correct it by adjusting the BFO frequencies, so it must be down to the filter being asymetrical. I understood; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00215.html (11,295 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus audio (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:20:38 +0000; Thanks Bob, yes I'm referring to the TX signal, although RX is similar of course. I agree with what you say, although the Omni6+ SSB filter is worse than that in any other rig I've used. I did align; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00233.html (14,439 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus audio (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:42:19 +0000; Sorry but the padding had nothing to do with the filter, I had to pad the oscillator to get it to it's specified frequency. 73 Fraser G4BJM> From: RMcGraw@Blomand.net> To: tentec@contesting.com> Date; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00365.html (16,934 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ QSK audio (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:47:23 +0000; Arne, please clarify this. What is the purpose and effect of this mod? I'm always interested in improving QSK. However, on my IF/AF board circuit diagram there is no U10. Which IC are you referring t; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00619.html (8,841 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 band data on RS-232 (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:47:10 +0000; I modified our club's Omni6+ to give standard 4 bit band data output. I can dig out the info if you need it. 73 Fraser G4BJM> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:29:30 -0400> From: hjohnc@gmail.com> To: tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00232.html (9,865 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Option 3 (score: 1): Author: Fraser Robertson <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:54:35 +0000; Tom, you probably have this by now, but if not I can dig it out. 73 Fraser G4BJM _________________________________________________________________ Celeb spotting Play CelebMashup and win cool prizes; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00233.html (8,217 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus/CW/Filter Question (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:39:10 +0000; The CW offset is fixed, but is adjustabe with a trimmer capacitor inside. Regarding filters, I find adjusting the PBT (and if necessary IRT) gives more than adequate range of RX pitch. The CW roofing; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00003.html (9,564 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-6+ cw offset adjustment (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:34:31 +0000; Hi all, sorry if I've caused or added any confusion. I appreciate that the sidetone pitch is front panel adjustable, and we're told that the TX offset tracks that (sorry I'd forgotten that, I need to; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00036.html (9,499 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Inrad Roofing Filters for Omni VI (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:45:25 +0000; I wired our club's Omni6+ so that the CW roofing filter is activated by the Processor button, (but only when CW mode is selected). Therefore all filter selctions remain possible. I'll dig out the inf; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00243.html (11,657 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Inrad Roofing Filters for Omni VI - PROC switch (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:49:42 +0000; Hi, I emailed mod info to those that requested it, but I think I deleted/lost a request . So if I haven't replied to you please let me know. 73 Fraser G4BJM the filter _______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00278.html (8,656 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI SIX problems (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:23:37 +0000; Our club has an Omni6+, a fairly old model with option 3. I've nulled the carrier on it several times but it soon drifts out of null again. The suppression on LSB I think I recall correctly is partic; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00520.html (8,625 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI tracking (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:33:42 +0000; There is an adjustment for netting on CW, I remember when we bought our club's Omni6+ is was miles off. If you can't find I'll dig the manual out and have a look. 73 Fraser G4BJM ____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00521.html (8,649 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI tracking - C16 (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:51:48 +0000; I just checked the manual. You need to adjust trimmer C16, which is on the corner of the TX Audio Board. That alters the CW TX freq in relation to the RX freq. (Ours was so far off I had to pad it wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00564.html (8,656 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI tracking - C16 (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:43:58 +0000; I sent this info earlier but it seems to have disappeared. To fix the TX/RX netting/tracking on CW you need to adjust trimmer C16, on the corner of the TX Audio Board. This alters the CW TX freq. w.r; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00591.html (9,772 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 + (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 22:41:26 +0000; Our clubs Omni6+ is just the same, sounds ok on LSB but restricted and toppy on USB. The carrier oscillators have been set as per the manual. I suspect the filter is the problem. Is this how the rigs; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00187.html (8,378 bytes)
19. [TenTec] OMNI VI RECEIVE AUDIO MOD? (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:23:02 +0000; Can anyone give me details of this mod please, the Inrad site says it improves the RX SSB audio. Does it do anything for the TX SSB signal? I'm getting reports of muffled TX audio. Thanks / 73 Fraser; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00041.html (7,282 bytes)
20. [TenTec] OMNI6+ SSB transmit quality - HELP! (score: 1): Author: "Fraser Robertson" <g4bjm@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 20:56:53 +0000; Hi all, is possible to transmit good quality SSB from this rig? I get reports of muffled audio. Listening on another RX I know what they mean. I've re-aligned the driver & pa bias, carrier oscillator; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00071.html (9,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]