Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:georgefritkin@yahoo.com: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] pr40 (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:31:46 -0800 (PST)
I disconnected my Heil and all processing equipment I used with my ORION ll. I am using the Ten-Tec mic and internal EQ. I get outstanding audio reports. No muss no fuss. George, W6GF I use the heil
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00542.html (11,516 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] pr40 (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Lee, I will check setting for you. The setting will be for my voice which is a little high pitched. George, W6GF George, I also have the TT OII...which TT mic are you using? What are your EQ and othe
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00544.html (12,757 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] pr40 (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Lee, TX EQ -4db SP 4 MIC 48 Mic is 709 HI 3000 LO 200 73 de George, W6GF George, I also have the TT OII...which TT mic are you using? What are your EQ and other Mic settings? 73, Lee I disconnected m
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00548.html (12,776 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 20:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Although the Sherwood list is important information it should not be the only criteria used to select a radio.  I am a sport car collector.  We have a saying, you do not drive the performance numbers
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00202.html (12,271 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:51:20 -0800 (PST)
Strictly on the basis of performance.....toss a coin.  There are other factors that may make a difference to you George John....how does the 590 compare to the K3? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Black
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00217.html (14,831 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:52:49 -0800 (PST)
Gosh I wish I had kept my old Studebaker. George, W6GF Argonaut V. I suppose we can find some irony in this. Transceivers constructed pre-digital (displays, control, DSP, etc) likely have better long
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00247.html (11,156 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:56:40 -0800 (PST)
In the 1960s I worked for a company called RIXON Electronics. The President of RIXON and my boss was Jim Hollis. Jim worked for Art for many years. The stories he told were !!!!!! George, W6GF Art wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00248.html (21,250 bytes)

48. [TenTec] What a great company (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:26:20 -0800 (PST)
________________________________ Ten-Tec did me a favor they really did not have to do. It is only exceptional companies that do such things. Thank you! Thank you! You guys are the best. Love my ORIO
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00516.html (7,555 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
The description is not properly written. Lock at at the antenna description.   It should say "using high loss coax" not low loss.  Point of fact the SWR loss using Times LM-400 or Belden RG-213 is un
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00216.html (10,816 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
There are tons of "loss vs swr" programs  for different types of coax, just search the net.  I have a Zerofive 43 foot antenna.  On 75 the SWR is <3.0:1.  On 160 it is <4.5:1.  Check the programs usi
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00224.html (10,742 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 07:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
You are just moving the match losses out to the $250.00 box at the antenna.  You are reducing the SWR losses in the coax.  So for maybe 1/2 DB coax loss you can spend the $250.00.  It does not make t
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00243.html (12,170 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
This discussion needs to be in a venue where people understand antennas. George, W6GF My point entirely. I suggested the AV-6110 in jest (where I should have marked it with ;<)_)but its a real soluti
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00252.html (9,710 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
You took my response wrong.  I am very interested.  I have an ORION ll driving a Ten Tec amp into a 43 foot Zerofive vertical.  But beyond that, antennas are very complex to analyze, model and, in fa
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00259.html (11,534 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] swr (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
The key is "learned member" George, W6GF I was contemplating buying one of these 43 foot antennas to hook up to my stable of Ten Tec radios.  It is almost impossible to find out the true performance
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00260.html (9,531 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Ten Tec Centaur (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:53 -0800 (PST)
what is your offer.  I have a real nice one   George, W6GF Howdy, I'm looking around for a *really* nice Ten Tec Centaur amp. Thanks and 73, Doug, W7KF http://www.w7kf.com ___________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00359.html (7,907 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] The Titan IIII ???? (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:02:02 -0800 (PST)
I do not see why TenTec needs another amp in their product line.   Tooling up for a low volume high power amp would seem like a waste of limited corporate resources.  While their amps have been good,
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00207.html (11,766 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuners...questions (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
George, W6GF PS If the solid state amp is the Ameritron, I use same setup...O2 to AlS-600 to Palstar Auto ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a bet
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00011.html (9,649 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuners...questions (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 11:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
Well I have the Palstar, the LDG 1000 and the MFJ. I just wonder if anybody looks inside ham gear any more. The Palstar looks like a 1.5 kw tuner, but neither the LDG or MFJ look like they can handle
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00015.html (13,932 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Antenna Tuners...questions (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 12:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Arthur, I have an old LDG tuner that I built in kit form. It has to be 12 years old and it still works great. The LDG 1000 I use for lower power linears....600 to 1000 watts and it works fine. I like
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00017.html (17,745 bytes)

60. [TenTec] My 2 cents (score: 1)
Author: george fritkin <georgefritkin@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
I can not sit quiet any more. My HF setup now has a dozen positions. No boat anchors, all the latest and greatest except I have nothing from Flex. In position best. I am an sports car collector. Corv
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00268.html (7,346 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu