Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:geraldj@storm.weather.net: 1055 ]

Total 1055 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II / 263 VFO Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:32:40 -0600
That's on the external PTO. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00195.html (7,768 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II / 263 VFO Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:33:52 -0600
Needs a jumper on the Accessory socket. Pin 2 to 6 according my my Corsair II manual. Lower left corner of the block diagram page. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00196.html (8,239 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Orion2 auto tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:22:46 -0600
Probably the way to do that is to apply for a job there. Full time. Otherwise, with a set of programming and debugging tools and a couple radios (I and II) that could be done anywhere. Its been hinte
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00265.html (9,338 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] What sort of bandwidth do you like? (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:04:29 -0600
I like to roll off the high end about 2100 Hz. Cuts QRM and noise without hurting copy, often improves copy of weak signals. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00272.html (9,337 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] More Omni A B and C questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:45:37 -0600
Insertion loss of the narrow filter is greater than the loss of the wide filter. So front end and IF gain is lower with the narrow filter. That's so pronounced that in some later radios, the narrow f
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00281.html (8,827 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] R-320 Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:30:00 -0600
Pins 1 and 7 on a 25 pin serial cable are chassis and signal grounds. They are always wired straight. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 20 are signals that are sometimes crossed. Much the same applies to 9 pin b
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00301.html (8,280 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:38:46 -0600
The higher power is saturating the core of the balun. One of the hazards of tuning through the balun. You could add 1/8 th wave or 1/4 wave of feed line, or use link coupled balun that uses no balun.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00322.html (9,980 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:19:12 -0600
And if they don't have enough core cross section, they too can saturate. But saturation is more difficult achieve with only one turn per core. Their big claim to fame is that the allow the antenna to
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00330.html (10,118 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:13:00 -0600
Yet, just like a transformer, the voltage across the choke is the same as the voltage on one side of the transformer, and one has to watch out for core saturation. Higher permeability cores can satur
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00348.html (11,268 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Argosy II Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:41:52 -0600
Happens in many Tentecs. The 20 MHz crystal in my Corsair II is 6.99 which means when the PTO readout says 21.320 that the PTO is at 5.330. 4*5.330 is exactly 21.320000 MHz. One tip I figured out whe
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00384.html (9,634 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:57:06 -0600
Filter cutting at 200 to 300 Hz is common, putting the BFO at the 20 dB down point. Sounds as if the BFO alignment is further from the filter than that. But with a crystal calibrator, you can determi
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00421.html (10,249 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:53:20 -0600
Before you leap into tweaking the BFO, see what the bandpass tuning and alternate filter selections do for the audio quality you wish. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00428.html (9,840 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:27:19 -0600
The effect of the bandpass tuning depends on what filters are in use at 9 and 6.3 MHz. If the filters are of comparable bandwidths, moving band pass tuning off of zero narrows the receiver bandwidth.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00431.html (11,476 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:56:06 -0600
I don't know about the bandpass filter knob. Didn't buy a V when I had a chance because I didn't like the way it shifts to LSB for CW. That's disaster in a VHF contest. I'm talking Band pass tuning.
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00435.html (11,075 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] PBT function in Omni V, Omni VI and others (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:57:03 -0600
Yes. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00437.html (11,242 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:19:05 -0600
True but if the response curve was run manually or with an audio spectrum analyzer like a PSK31 program, as I suggested a couple times, that ailing filter would have been discovered. We haven't exact
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00448.html (10,307 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] poor harsh audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:53:00 -0600
Omni V and VI use the same filters and frequencies as Corsair and Corsair II. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00453.html (11,454 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:58:15 -0600
Sounds bad on receive. 73, Jerry, K0CQ
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00454.html (9,226 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:28:49 -0600
In some Tentec radios there is a problem combining PTT return and microphone return and shield return, going to the PC board, not to the case and that injects RF into the audio board. The cure as I r
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00462.html (9,272 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] poor audio on OMNI-V (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:42:08 -0600
Resolution is distinct from accuracy. What is the precision of the counter's clock? It can be as bad as 100 ppm which is a 100 Hz error at 1 MHz or 900 Hz at 9 MHz which is disastrous when aligning a
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00463.html (11,234 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu