Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ghoffman@spacetech.com: 567 ]

Total 567 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] omini 6+ & antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:07:49 -0400
I agree with the three suggestions I've seen so far. The Coax is undoubtedly Very lossy after 30 years, and is likely to have many pinholes and "mini-shorts" (if I can invent a term) that will greatl
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00440.html (9,297 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] Omni vi plus input audio feed for psk (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:47:29 -0400
Hello, I would also love to see this document. Grounding is one of my favorite topics. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ luck. invitation breaks and E-Mail size. I to speaker same any _______________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00599.html (22,657 bytes)

203. Re: [TenTec] SSB recieve audio? (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:48:35 -0400
I was hoping to hear from Caity on this one ! (smiles) Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00600.html (9,776 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] RFI question...T-T... (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:39:01 -0400
That's pretty much right. Steel and other ferrous materials are superior for Magnetic shielding, and if magnetic coupling is the problem, steel can be the answer. Generally magnetic coupling is not t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00698.html (8,475 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec and Butternut HF6V Problem And Question (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:33:20 -0400
Oh excellent ! Simply outstanding. This adds scientific clarity to an otherwise obscure subject. Made my day ! (grin) 73 de Gary, AA2IZ rig efficiency full market ignoring 300' corsair ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00722.html (12,081 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:31:36 -0400
Fascinating. Can you elaborate on this calibration method. Its nothing I had ever heard about before. Thanks. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00057.html (9,411 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] was - "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 15:24:07 -0400
I also use the 135 ft Dipole fed with ladder line. It gives me just excellent results. I use other antennas and feedlines as well, and my experience has been that with a proper setup of the entire st
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00263.html (13,262 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:20:29 -0400
Well, Bob has it in a nutshell. If everything is balanced, then basic physics rules, as always, and the equal and opposite fields set up by the equal and opposite currents in the feeder will cancel a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00300.html (25,314 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:31:08 -0400
Of course, one must not forget that, feedline notwithstanding, the antenna Does radiate (we all hope). So I guess maybe 5kw 5 feet away from anything whatsoever might be a problem. Now on the other h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00305.html (19,290 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:07:35 -0400
That's right. I mentioned that in another post. So did at least one other person. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ points the in _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00329.html (10,999 bytes)

211. Re: [TenTec] vertical dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "gary" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:55:44 -0400
One certainly needs a tuner if one is going to connect the 50 ohm output of a modern solid state rig to the high impedance at the end of a half wave antenna. Of course this is done all the time. I re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00378.html (11,412 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:56:05 -0400
Me too. I still have a multi-band vertical up, but of course its not a half wave dipole. Even so, it compares reasonably well with my beam. (That is, the beam is better, but not by an overwhelming ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00409.html (16,352 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:44:37 -0400
Ok, lets get this straight before I get confused again :) :) I got out my Carr Lane book of "Handy Multipliers and Trigonometry Tables for Engineers" which my Dad gave me back in 1968. It lists the c
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00426.html (17,893 bytes)

214. Re: [TenTec] Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400
Yes indeed. Or one could go back and speak to Mr. Marconi himself, for whom the vertical antenna bearing his name was of course, well, er, named. :) Your point (and others) being that the vertical an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00427.html (8,309 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:57:44 -0400
OK, now that I wrote this I see that the issue had already been corrected and set to rest. I did not mean to beat a dead horse and apologize for having said it yet again, after it was already settled
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00428.html (19,937 bytes)

216. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:41:19 -0400
You have to run a "divide by a thousand" transverter :) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00479.html (8,119 bytes)

217. Re: [TenTec] This is War! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:24:45 -0400
Which Ten Tec rig does this crap refer to ? it. know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII). very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00998.html (22,884 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet, Neptune, Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:32:02 -0400
Hehehehee.....I think that "put in a load" meant he did a load of wash....not inserted a dummy load in the antenna line. Of course I could be wrong. 73 de Gary. AA2IZ fact That's a The ham RF to comp
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00411.html (12,471 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] This is War! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:10:14 -0400
Jim, Thank you for informing me. I will avoid the use of the "c" word in future. Of course I have seen far worse on the list, but I assume all those folks were placed on moderated status as well. I s
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00437.html (29,894 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:03:47 -0500
I guess we've all had horrible experiences like that, and wish we could crawl under the earth and hide. My feelings regarding the whole deal are these: Let's not be critical of anyone except yourself
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00477.html (13,082 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu