Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gtuck@mac.com: 130 ]

Total 130 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] ORION2_HW-NOISE_BLANKER (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:21:41 -0800
I also thought the software NB was near useless until I cranked it up to 9 one morning when the OTH radar was on 40m. The blanker took it out! Gary W7TEA I certainly do not find the software noise bl
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00901.html (8,515 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] No V2 Christmas Gift (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:55:37 -0800
I had my hopes up as well. Figure it's been over three months since the last update and there are still a few obvious issues. Maybe the new year will bring new firmware? 73, Gary W7TEA Well, it looks
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00582.html (7,362 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Radio Control/Contesting?? (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:33:38 -0800
Bob, this site has a lot of info on the Orion. http://www.ok1rr.com/download.php?sekce=11 73, Gary W7TEA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00664.html (9,282 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Orion NR / SSB settings (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 15:17:02 -0800
I would be interested if anyone has found appropriate NR settings for CW which they feel work well--for either Orion or Orion II. I've been totally unsuccessful in getting anything other than a disto
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00686.html (7,473 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Received cw sigs (2.059) (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 06:35:16 -0800
I've noticed the distortion on the leading edge of strong CW signals as well with v2.059. Although to a greater extent, I had the same issue with v1.371 and v1.372. My rig was last updated in the spr
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00121.html (7,833 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio Deluxe (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:12:20 -0700
John, Simon hasn't updated HRD for v2 firmware yet. Inaccurate S- meter readings is one such result apparently. Don't think it's related to your new PC. My HP laptop shows the same thing. Gary W7TEA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00026.html (7,111 bytes)

27. [TenTec] New Firmware (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:48:59 -0700
New firmware for Orion 1 v2 and Orion II posted on rfsquared. Gary W7TEA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00117.html (6,649 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Ramblings about 2.059d firmware (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:25:02 -0700
Lee I noticed the sidetone/spot issue as well. Until this firmware version, I've found the spot tone volume less than the sidetone. So, when I had the sidetone at the level I prefer, I could hardly h
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00151.html (8,253 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Sidetone Level with 2.037j (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:46:42 -0700
I believe the same thing is happening with 2.059d for Orion. The difference may be that in prior versions (2.056) just the opposite was happening--at least with my rig. I'd set the sidetone to a comf
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00194.html (7,949 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] LDG tuners for Ten Tec radios (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:30:56 -0700
My 8/04 Orion/AT came with a LDG tuner. When LDG released the new Orion and Jupiter tuners this spring, I bought an updated chip for $25 to provide 100 memories. Only had to cut one trace and solder
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00458.html (8,297 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Identifying Filter Boards (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:20:17 -0700
I doubt the board is a 217, 218 or 219 with four crystals. These boards have 6 or 8 crystals I believe. The pictures on the accessories page of the TT site do correspond to the filters in my VI+. htt
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00464.html (8,434 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amplifier - 110 volt? (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:10:16 -0700
Ed, I was in the same situation and found a very nice Ten Tec Centaur amp. Runs QSK beautifully and puts out about 500w. I put in 572B tubes for the 811A's. Runs quite well on 110v. Only drawback is
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00525.html (7,246 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking? (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:50:23 -0700
Bob, I too wish there was more flexibility when assigning VFO B to the main receiver. For example, I believe the larger display font should be used for whichever VFO is assigned to the main receiver.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00632.html (8,070 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] ORION II--Tech Topics (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:56:36 -0700
Always wondered why Orion discussions didn't occur on the Orion list of the same contesting.com reflector. Without the history and for a simple mind, it would make sense to me. Gary W7TEA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00376.html (7,061 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Help with Digital Modes on Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:37:24 -0700
My experience is limited to PSk31 but found the SignaLink SL-1+ easy to use. You can configure it to use with any rig and it leaves the serial port free to use HRD. Might check that site (http:// for
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00487.html (9,010 bytes)

36. [TenTec] Omni VI+ question (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 08:28:01 -0700
I understand that as the VI+ evolved, some boards were constructed with SMD technology. Does anyone know if the RF board (underside of rig near finals unit) was built with SMDs in later rigs? If I do
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00571.html (7,767 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ question (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:07:19 -0700
I want to thank everyone for responding to my question on the Omni VI + SMD board both on the reflector and privately. Gary W7TEA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00595.html (7,392 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Price (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:01:30 -0700
I can think of prices today and yesteryear in different ways. I know that I bought a brand new Toyota for $3k thirty years ago and today, probably costs more than ten times that amount. At the same t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00825.html (8,738 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Inflation Calculator (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:08:59 -0700
CPI may be related to salaries over the long run but it sure hasn't been for the majority of folks who work for wages/salary in the last half dozen years at least. I'm not saying that is a reason why
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00849.html (8,687 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] What version? (score: 1)
Author: Gary Tuck <gtuck@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:31:24 -0700
I operate CW almost exclusively and also use v2.056. It's been rock solid without some of the audio anomalies of v1.37x and crashes when used with my Centaur amp. I really miss the v1.371 NR though.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00610.html (7,270 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu