Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:gw7lhi@hotmail.com: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Service Pack 2 Won't Install (off topic!!) (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:40:14 -0500
Jim, It's possible that your motherboard requires a BIOS upgrade. You should find it at the motherboard manufacturers web sit, usually in support or download areas. It is important to establish which
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00404.html (10,444 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Omni V question (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 13:26:14 +0100
It certainly does, Bill. Well mine does anyway! Paul MW0CDO.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00934.html (7,531 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Please explain Omni 6 options ? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:18:26 +0100
You will not be disappointed Peter. I have an Omni V with the N4PY replacement microprocessor. It is an excellent radio compared to just about any Japanese radio as far as RF / on air performance goe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00680.html (9,235 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:43:53 -0500
Hi Noel. Yep, a lot of people knock the good old horizontal loop for no good reason. I'd like to get my loop up at 185ft! I have a non resonant horizontal loop about 156ft total wire length at 25ft A
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00438.html (12,037 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:04:17 -0500
That's what I've been told too, Bob.. More wire = more contacts. A real G2 and a couple of real G3's told me that it's a good rule of thumb. So that's what I did, no measuring...just put as big a loo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00440.html (9,836 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:09:11 -0500
Rick, just after posting I thought... Capture area.. can be a big deal at VHF up, what about HF / LF.. Paul MW0CDO. Maybe there is something
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00443.html (9,355 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:28:26 -0500
Hi Pete et al.. I wasn't "getting at you" specifically..:-) Of course there's no single solution to suit every need, and antennas is one area that most ops can indulge in a little experimentation her
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00483.html (12,454 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:57:05 -0500
Thanks for the info Rick. When I have installed my tower, I might just put a vertical loop up to compare with the horizontal. I need the tower as a support, otherwise I would already have one up. My
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00568.html (10,156 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] We need a volunteer (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:58:53 -0500
This sounds good.. a picture tells a thousand stories... Paul MW0CDO.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00569.html (10,231 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:38:39 -0500
Thanks for the info Stuart. I'm off to spend a little time with Google... 73 Paul MW0CDO. and wire
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00596.html (10,073 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:51:00 -0500
Hello all, thanks for looking As folk were discussing wire antennas, please forgive another non T-T specific post! I have a fair amount of experience with beam antennas on HF / VHF, and colinears on
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00103.html (10,583 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Wire loop antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 18:51:31 -0500
Hi everyone, who emailed off or on list. Many thanks to all for the suggestions and explanations. I shall have to digest them all. Results so far are encouraging. It radiates on 160m, at least I had
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00165.html (7,072 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:56:06 -0500
Hi all. Many thanks for all of your comments, much appreciated and now digested a little! The loop is playing well for me in some respects. To my surprise, I'm getting good reports on top band using
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00259.html (10,588 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:04:18 -0500
Hi all. Thanks for all who have responded! I'm not sure where the "no groundwave signal" stuff started.. I said that I'd noted QSB on a signal from approx 5 miles away as RF goes on 80m. I assume tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00354.html (12,839 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:22:56 -0500
Stuart. I'd come to that conclusion as well, so I may try to move the feedpoint further away from the window. The rest of the loop is about 8ft higher than the guttering, but the actual feedpoint sag
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00466.html (11,131 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:08:22 -0500
Thanks Stuart. That's interesting, as I've also seen another type of loop where there are 2 loops one above the other constructed with a single wire. In other words, a double loop. The spacing is abo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00518.html (10,901 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:49:14 -0500
Stuart. Yes, I see the problems. There's obviously a few bits of hardware on the roof with all those feeders and obstacles. Hope the cloudwarmer works out for you. 73 Paul MW0CDO. -- Original Message
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00567.html (9,472 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:38:36 -0500
Rick.. In the current RadCom ( RSGB Journal ) on page 37 there is a UK Ten-Tec importer advertising. They are preparing to begin Orion imports, and have the Jupiter available. See http://www.aoruk.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00503.html (10,646 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Why leave out calibration information TT???? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:27:39 -0500
I too would like the answer to the question below. I have an Omni V, and would like to investigate the lopsided PBT tuning that it has.. but I don't want to do a "screwdrivers expert" job on it in ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00907.html (9,857 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Why leave out calibration information TT???? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:37:51 -0500
Rick, I have my doubts that AOR would be clued up on older TT kit.. but will give them a call once Christmas is over. I did ask the very nice Chinese gentleman who mans the TT rally stall, and he kne
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00911.html (12,308 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu