Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jafrank@nyc.rr.com: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] FS: OMNI VI+ complete station (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:15:17 -0400
Dave - I am very interested in your complete Omni 6Opt1 station. What is the serial number of the Omni6? Do you know the date of manufacture. I understand the equipment is in excellent electrical con
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00149.html (8,381 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:27:11 -0500
All you guys who report about the great audio reports you receive on ssb with the Omni 6 series please tell me what microphones or microphone hook ups you are using. I recently purchased an Omni 6 an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00582.html (11,347 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:44:08 -0500
Thanks to all you guys who responded to my query about the best mic setup for the Omni 6 -- one more thing -- the Tentec mic is amplified (because it uses a battery) -- does that mean I should try an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00597.html (12,821 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 26, Issue 76 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:35:56 -0800
With all this talk about not wanting to disable the Omni 6 noise blanker ... I have to say that my Omni 6 noise blanker doesn't seem to do anything at all and I have no Inrad filter. My radio just ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00804.html (35,086 bytes)

5. [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:18:39 -0800
I'm trying to decide which of the above two high power ant tuners (new) is the best one to get. I have a TT Omni 6 (opt 1) and an Ameritron 572 amp with internal QSK. My understanding is the TT amp i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00503.html (8,249 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] apparent match possible in T Tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:15:52 -0800
Do you mean to say you really might not be able to notice that all the RF is just circulating in the tuner with a T match instead of going out to the antenna if you get the "false" match? There would
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00518.html (35,089 bytes)

7. [TenTec] TT vs. Palstar Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:48:10 -0800
Thanks to all of you who responded with your comments on the TT 238B and the Palstar 1500CV high power tuners. I appreciate the value of being part of this reflector group. Jeff - KX2P ______________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00535.html (6,660 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Real Meaning of the New FCC Proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:46:27 -0400
I'm not picking on you in particular Rob, but your idea that cw will continue to live on as strongly, without it being an FCC testing requirement, strikes me as quite naive. The FCC's new proposal to
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00829.html (7,667 bytes)

9. [TenTec] FCC Testing Requirements (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:45:48 -0400
Rick, I think when people begin ham radio they don't really know what to think about it's various aspects. I think they take their lead about what is important and what isn't from license entrance re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00856.html (7,325 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Ten Tec's return policy (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:59:39 -0400
Come-on. As I read what happened, the guy returned one Orion (per TT's return policy) and then wrote an unfavorable report on the equipment. If they were afraid he was some kind of a nut-job whey did
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00916.html (7,623 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Logical extension of your analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:23:15 -0400
Ok Warren, then I have an idea. Let's make it that you can't use cw unless you are an amateur extra. Or, maybe there can be some new Super Class license that you have to achieve before you're legally
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00938.html (7,198 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Burned out health care provider (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:42:10 -0400
Hey Lee, You didn't specify what your medical specialty is (probably soon to be was) but I hope for everyone's sake, it doesn't involve direct patient care. Jeff (KX2P) ______________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01069.html (6,562 bytes)

13. [TenTec] TT's return policy (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:57:01 -0400
Adam, You are so right ... that's all they have to do. Jeff KX2P _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01154.html (6,783 bytes)

14. [TenTec] You were bad (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:04:47 -0400
Yes, M.P. You would have deserved it and probably more if I had my way. Now, go to bed and no television for you for a week. Jeff KX2P _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01156.html (6,601 bytes)

15. [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:03:20 -0400
Randy - I couldn't have said it as well. You wrote just what I was thinking. Jeff KX2P _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00480.html (6,706 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Omin Six Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:02:52 -0500
Larry, I had a problem with my Omni Six where the radio had to be returned to TenTec four times and each time something else would go wrong. Eventually, the radio was fixed and the folks at Tentec re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00531.html (7,351 bytes)

17. [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:21:30 -0500
Hi All, I need some help in deciding if I want to buy the TenTec Jupiter. I'm looking for a back-up to my Omni 6, opt 1 (which I couldn't be happier with). Work mostly cw, but some ssb also. If I buy
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00287.html (6,864 bytes)

18. [TenTec] Omin 6 vs. Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:20:36 -0500
Thanks to everyone who responded to my question about the Omni 6 vs. the Jupiter. Alot to think about. The general feeling seems to be the Omni is superior selectivity-wise and would be the cw "pick"
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00310.html (6,859 bytes)

19. [TenTec] OMNI 7 (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:16:13 -0500
Does anyone have information on what happened to the Omin 7? I though it was supposed to come out toward the end of last year, but I haven't heard anyone mention anything about it in some time. Thank
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00689.html (7,153 bytes)

20. [TenTec] WIDER FILTER FOR WEAK CW DXING? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 09:19:24 -0400
I have an Omni 6 opt 1, which I like very much, but on weak cw signals, my experience with the filters seems counter-intuitive. I almost always have easier and clearer copy on weak cw signals when I
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00237.html (7,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu