Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1)
Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 11:06:12 -0700
It won't be the bean counters that put them out of business, it will be their engineering and manufacturing. I pointed out for over a year the need for slower RIT tuning on the OMNI-VI. "Thanks, we'l
/archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00020.html (9,791 bytes)

2. Auto tuner, was Re: Omni V for QRP (score: 1)
Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:49:59 -0700
OMNI-VI. <snipped my own stuff> They were there before the new ROM, which I did get a beta copy of and tried. It corrected the problems. I have not experienced the "pumping qsk", nor the howling filt
/archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00022.html (11,839 bytes)

3. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:42:31 -0800
as I think there is a combination of firmware and software problems on the OMNI-VI RS-232 interface. I have used WriteLog with the interface and speeds over 2400 baud causes the main tuning dial to l
/archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00004.html (9,013 bytes)

4. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:27:53 -0800
Good point ... and that does raise some interesting avenues to explore. Prior to 9.26 I fibbed and told CT that my radio was a IC735 (uses the factory default address of 04). WriteLog polled, it also
/archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00008.html (8,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu