Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim@audiosystemsgroup.com: 120 ]

Total 120 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TenTec] Filter weasels (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:09:58 -0600
I bought an Omni V from K8ZT last year that was loaded with filters. The price took that into account. A new ham friend bought a 746 from a qrz listing. It also came with optional filters installed.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00497.html (9,748 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] shipping corsair to hawaii (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:41:48 -0600
A well-connected ham with a strong business management background in the Virgin Islands from whom I bought a Titan amp STRONGLY advised against using Parcel Post to get from him to me in Chicago. Cou
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00516.html (9,061 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec used/demo gear 23 Nov 2004 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 23:53:25 -0600
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:39:04 -0500, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales wrote: A little thing has bugged me ever since I subscribed to contesting.com mailing lists is how some numbers somehow get left o
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00557.html (7,909 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:24:20 -0600
I agree with that. A month ago, I was running my Omni V barefoot on CW on the bottom of 80. A few days later, I got an angry email from a guy who complained that I was QRMing a DX station 1 kHz away.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00574.html (10,970 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:40:17 -0600
hook Ah -- you bring up a very interesting defect in the design of the Ten Tec rigs. You can't use a "flat" mic with them, you need to use one that has a "hyped" high end. That's what the Heil mics d
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00587.html (11,076 bytes)

26. RE: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:50:56 -0600
Strongly agree. See my review on eham. Jim Brown K9YC
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00604.html (9,858 bytes)

27. RE: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:01:03 -0600
I disagree. DSP is a big plus in the K2, and I'm assuming it. I very much like the DSP in the K2, and it works very well both on CW and SSB. But it is an AUDIO DSP, not an IF DSP. The limitations on
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00616.html (11,153 bytes)

28. RE: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:08:11 -0600
I've never owned a Jupiter, so this is an educated guess. I suspect it is a low-cut for the transmit audio. I would set it by ear listening to your transmit audio and by getting signal reports from s
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00617.html (13,572 bytes)

29. RE: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 08:59:14 -0600
That VERY Interesting, Adam. Many thanks for posting this. This is the missing piece of the puzzle as to why our radios are built this way! But it is a really poor recommendation, because it requires
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00647.html (10,368 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ audio distortion trouble question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:59:31 -0500
This distortion is caused by overdrive somewhere. It could be in the audio card in the computer generating the PSK, it could be overdrive of the mic input of the transmitter, it could be overdrive of
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00012.html (8,428 bytes)

31. [TenTec] WTB Power Supply for Hercules II (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:48:18 -0500
I've recently acquired a used Hercules II, but without a power supply. Two questions. 1) Does anyone have a matching TenTec supply in good condition to sell for its real value (as opposed to its "col
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00153.html (7,768 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Ham Radio Deluxe (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:11:13 -0500
Here's an email I received from the author of Ham Radio Deluxe, an excellent freeware software suite (in addition to its main rig control component, it also includes a wonderful PSK31 program and a n
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00021.html (7,604 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:34:55 -0500
The name of the game on Field Day is cleanliness of RF output and a bulletproof receiver. IMO, the only good choices are the newer generation Omni's, the Orion, and the Elecraft K2 family. The K2/10
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00088.html (11,376 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:55:08 -0500
One point I forgot to address. The K2 is not as easy to operate as the Omni or 746 families. The original post correctly noted, for example, that the DSP system scores very poorly for user-friendline
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00089.html (9,800 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:31:28 -0500
Racked I did just under 1,000 Q's on mine, in about 17 hours. At my home QTH, in the middle of Chicago, I have a moderately high noise level that the K2 Noise Blanker won't touch (the Omni V NB does)
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00102.html (9,652 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:42:44 -0500
If the VSWR is below 4:1, RG-59 and RG-8X have very little loss below 28 MHz. IMO, the value of open wire line is HIGHLY over-rated. There's an equation (and a graph of it) in the ARRL Handbook and A
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00103.html (9,928 bytes)

37. [TenTec] Re: Resonant antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:55:00 -0500
I'm not so sure about that, Ken, even though I've read that statement in a bunch of places from folks who considered themselves "authorities." I have an 80/40 dipole up about 45 ft fed by some old (b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00104.html (10,711 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Sweep display freezing on Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 00:31:20 -0500
As member of the Standards Committee of the Audio Engineering Society, I would be equally curious. Measuring the response of a loudspeaker requires considerably more instrumentation than a scope and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00141.html (10,373 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Re: Resonant antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:10:09 -0500
me vertical Speaking from the position of only thinking about it with my quasimathmatical brain (?) and not modeling it, I view my "dipole feedline tied together and fed against ground (counterpoise?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00178.html (10,174 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] new owner Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:08:21 -0500
Huh? A good manual is one of the most fundamental elements of a successful product. A product is not finished (and should not be shipped) until a GOOD manual for it is part of the package. FWIW, as m
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00255.html (8,546 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu